前交叉韧带重建后粘连溶解的时机是否影响最终的活动范围?

Christopher A. Schneble, Benjamin Miltenberg, Kevin Jurgensmeier, Gaston Davis, Adam J. Tagliero, Kevin B. Freedman, Aaron J. Krych, Steven B. Cohen
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建后粘连溶解的时机是否影响最终的活动范围?","authors":"Christopher A. Schneble, Benjamin Miltenberg, Kevin Jurgensmeier, Gaston Davis, Adam J. Tagliero, Kevin B. Freedman, Aaron J. Krych, Steven B. Cohen","doi":"10.1177/03635465251383162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Purpose: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA &lt;3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients &gt;6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA &lt;3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and &gt;6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .8), extension ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .746), or total arc of motion ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .982) in final ROM. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Timing of Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Final Range of Motion?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A. Schneble, Benjamin Miltenberg, Kevin Jurgensmeier, Gaston Davis, Adam J. Tagliero, Kevin B. Freedman, Aaron J. Krych, Steven B. Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465251383162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Purpose: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA &lt;3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients &gt;6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA &lt;3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and &gt;6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion ( <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">P</jats:italic> = .8), extension ( <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">P</jats:italic> = .746), or total arc of motion ( <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">P</jats:italic> = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable ( <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">P</jats:italic> = .982) in final ROM. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251383162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251383162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1.7% - 38%的前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者出现关节纤维化,且患者报告的术后预后较差。关于ACLR后关节纤维化的最佳干预时间的数据有限。目的:评估ACLR术后关节纤维化治疗时机是否影响最终膝关节活动范围(ROM),并帮助建立ACLR术后关节纤维化干预时机的指导方针。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:回顾性筛选2例ACLR (CPT 29888)术后在麻醉下(CPT 27570)进行或不进行操作的粘连松解(LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884和29875)患者的数据库。在多个时间点收集临床ROM评估。根据LOA时间将患者分组。进行比较分析以评估ROM与干预时间之间的关系。结果:79例患者行ACLR术后LOA: 25例患者从ACLR到LOA时间为3个月,23例患者为3 ~ 6个月,31例患者为6个月。早期失活与失活前更大的运动完全丧失有关。从ACLR到LOA时间为3个月、3 ~ 6个月和6个月的患者,最终总活动弧度分别为132.7°、133.7°和131.8°。两组之间在最终屈曲(P = 0.8)、伸展(P = 0.746)或总运动弧度(P = 0.781)方面无显著差异。线性回归模型没有将ACLR到LOA的时间作为最终ROM的预测变量(P = .982)。结论:本研究未能证明LOA时间与最终ROM之间存在线性关系。无论干预时间如何,ROM均显著改善;然而,更严重的关节纤维化患者在更早的时间点进行LOA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Timing of Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Final Range of Motion?
Background: Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Purpose: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients >6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and >6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion ( P = .8), extension ( P = .746), or total arc of motion ( P = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable ( P = .982) in final ROM. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信