Muhammad Ahmed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Mahnoor Humayun, Barka Sajid, Siraj Ahmad, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar
{"title":"秋水仙碱二级预防心血管疾病的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad Ahmed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Mahnoor Humayun, Barka Sajid, Siraj Ahmad, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colchicine may reduce cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) through its anti-inflammatory effects. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 10, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing colchicine with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Eligible trials had ≥ 30 days of colchicine use and reported cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included extended MACE (eMACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, coronary revascularization, gastrointestinal events, infection, myalgia, arrhythmia, cancer, alopecia, and treatment discontinuation. Random-effects models were used to calculate risk ratios with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity and potential effect modifiers. Eleven studies included 19,618 patients with 9814 and 9804 patients in the colchicine and control groups, respectively. The colchicine group was significantly associated with a lower rate of MACE compared to the control group (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.92, p = 0.006; I² = 44%). From the secondary outcomes, eMACE (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001; I² = 73%), MI (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96, p = 0.01), and coronary revascularization (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.87, p = 0.007) were found to be significantly lower in the colchicine group. All the other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Meta-regression analysis for MACE showed a statistically significant association with diabetes (coefficient: -0.0778, p = 0.0013), indicating a potential modifying effect. Other covariates, including mean age, hypertension, smoking, and prior revascularization, did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. Colchicine reduces MACE, MI, and revascularization in CAD patients, supporting its use for secondary prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ahmed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Mahnoor Humayun, Barka Sajid, Siraj Ahmad, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colchicine may reduce cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) through its anti-inflammatory effects. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 10, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing colchicine with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Eligible trials had ≥ 30 days of colchicine use and reported cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included extended MACE (eMACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, coronary revascularization, gastrointestinal events, infection, myalgia, arrhythmia, cancer, alopecia, and treatment discontinuation. Random-effects models were used to calculate risk ratios with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity and potential effect modifiers. Eleven studies included 19,618 patients with 9814 and 9804 patients in the colchicine and control groups, respectively. The colchicine group was significantly associated with a lower rate of MACE compared to the control group (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.92, p = 0.006; I² = 44%). From the secondary outcomes, eMACE (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001; I² = 73%), MI (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96, p = 0.01), and coronary revascularization (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.87, p = 0.007) were found to be significantly lower in the colchicine group. All the other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Meta-regression analysis for MACE showed a statistically significant association with diabetes (coefficient: -0.0778, p = 0.0013), indicating a potential modifying effect. Other covariates, including mean age, hypertension, smoking, and prior revascularization, did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. Colchicine reduces MACE, MI, and revascularization in CAD patients, supporting its use for secondary prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
秋水仙碱可能通过其抗炎作用减少冠心病(CAD)的心血管事件。PubMed, Scopus和Cochrane图书馆检索了从成立到2025年5月10日的随机对照试验(rct),比较秋水仙碱与安慰剂或常规治疗对CAD患者的影响。符合条件的试验使用秋水仙碱≥30天,并报告心血管结局。主要终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。次要结局包括延长MACE (eMACE)、心肌梗死(MI)、中风、全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、冠状动脉血运重建、胃肠道事件、感染、肌痛、心律失常、癌症、脱发和治疗中断。随机效应模型用于计算95% ci的风险比。采用I²统计量评估异质性,并进行meta回归分析以探讨异质性和潜在的影响因子。11项研究包括19618例患者,秋水仙碱组和对照组分别为9814例和9804例。与对照组相比,秋水仙碱组MACE发生率较低(RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.92, p = 0.006; I²= 44%)。从次要结局来看,秋水仙碱组eMACE (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001; I²= 73%)、心肌梗死(RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96, p = 0.01)和冠状动脉血运重建术(RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.87, p = 0.007)均显著降低。其他次要结局均无统计学意义。meta -回归分析显示MACE与糖尿病的相关性有统计学意义(系数:-0.0778,p = 0.0013),表明MACE具有潜在的调节作用。其他协变量,包括平均年龄、高血压、吸烟和先前的血运重建术,没有显示统计学上显著的关联。秋水仙碱可降低冠心病患者的MACE、心肌梗死和血运重建,支持其用于二级预防。
Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Colchicine may reduce cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) through its anti-inflammatory effects. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 10, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing colchicine with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Eligible trials had ≥ 30 days of colchicine use and reported cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included extended MACE (eMACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, coronary revascularization, gastrointestinal events, infection, myalgia, arrhythmia, cancer, alopecia, and treatment discontinuation. Random-effects models were used to calculate risk ratios with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity and potential effect modifiers. Eleven studies included 19,618 patients with 9814 and 9804 patients in the colchicine and control groups, respectively. The colchicine group was significantly associated with a lower rate of MACE compared to the control group (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.92, p = 0.006; I² = 44%). From the secondary outcomes, eMACE (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001; I² = 73%), MI (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96, p = 0.01), and coronary revascularization (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.87, p = 0.007) were found to be significantly lower in the colchicine group. All the other secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Meta-regression analysis for MACE showed a statistically significant association with diabetes (coefficient: -0.0778, p = 0.0013), indicating a potential modifying effect. Other covariates, including mean age, hypertension, smoking, and prior revascularization, did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. Colchicine reduces MACE, MI, and revascularization in CAD patients, supporting its use for secondary prevention.