经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者左室射血分数对预后的影响——系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.1
Circulation reports Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0126
Yosuke Nabeshima, Tetsuji Kitano, Yoshiko Sakamoto, Masaaki Takeuchi, Koichi Node
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者左室射血分数对预后的影响——系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yosuke Nabeshima, Tetsuji Kitano, Yoshiko Sakamoto, Masaaki Takeuchi, Koichi Node","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to assess systolic function and to predict cardiovascular outcomes, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024 that evaluated the association between preprocedural LVEF and post-TAVI outcomes. Eligible studies were identified via PubMed and Scopus, and included those reporting hazard ratios for preprocedural LVEF. A total of 92 studies comprising 98 patient cohorts and 75,085 individuals were included. Random-effects models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessed effect modifiers, including ethnicity, LVEF classification, endpoints, and study design. Each 1% decrease in LVEF was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03), and this association remained significant after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of this association in various settings. In the multivariable meta-regression, studies with lower mean LVEF demonstrated a stronger association between reduced LVEF and adverse outcomes, but this association was attenuated or nonsignificant in cohorts with preserved systolic function. This suggests that the prognostic value of LVEF may depend on the baseline level of ventricular function and is subject to effect modification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced preprocedural LVEF is independently associated with worse prognosis after TAVI. These results highlight the continued importance of LVEF in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in TAVI candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 10","pages":"980-987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Utility of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Nabeshima, Tetsuji Kitano, Yoshiko Sakamoto, Masaaki Takeuchi, Koichi Node\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to assess systolic function and to predict cardiovascular outcomes, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024 that evaluated the association between preprocedural LVEF and post-TAVI outcomes. Eligible studies were identified via PubMed and Scopus, and included those reporting hazard ratios for preprocedural LVEF. A total of 92 studies comprising 98 patient cohorts and 75,085 individuals were included. Random-effects models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessed effect modifiers, including ethnicity, LVEF classification, endpoints, and study design. Each 1% decrease in LVEF was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03), and this association remained significant after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of this association in various settings. In the multivariable meta-regression, studies with lower mean LVEF demonstrated a stronger association between reduced LVEF and adverse outcomes, but this association was attenuated or nonsignificant in cohorts with preserved systolic function. This suggests that the prognostic value of LVEF may depend on the baseline level of ventricular function and is subject to effect modification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced preprocedural LVEF is independently associated with worse prognosis after TAVI. These results highlight the continued importance of LVEF in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in TAVI candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"980-987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左室射血分数(LVEF)被广泛用于评估收缩功能和预测心血管预后,但其在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中的预后作用仍不确定。方法和结果:我们对2001年至2024年发表的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了手术前LVEF与tavi后结果之间的关系。通过PubMed和Scopus确定符合条件的研究,包括那些报告手术前LVEF风险比的研究。共纳入92项研究,包括98个患者队列和75,085名个体。随机效应模型用于单变量和多变量分析。亚组和荟萃回归分析评估了影响因素,包括种族、LVEF分类、终点和研究设计。LVEF每降低1%与不良事件风险增加相关(风险比1.02,95%可信区间:1.01-1.03),在调整混杂因素后,这种关联仍然显著。亚组分析证实了这种关联在各种情况下的稳健性。在多变量荟萃回归中,平均LVEF较低的研究表明,LVEF降低与不良结局之间存在更强的关联,但在收缩功能保存的队列中,这种关联减弱或不显著。这表明LVEF的预后价值可能取决于心室功能的基线水平,并可能受到影响。结论:手术前LVEF降低与TAVI术后较差的预后独立相关。这些结果强调了LVEF在TAVI患者风险分层和临床决策中的持续重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Utility of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to assess systolic function and to predict cardiovascular outcomes, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain.

Methods and results: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024 that evaluated the association between preprocedural LVEF and post-TAVI outcomes. Eligible studies were identified via PubMed and Scopus, and included those reporting hazard ratios for preprocedural LVEF. A total of 92 studies comprising 98 patient cohorts and 75,085 individuals were included. Random-effects models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses assessed effect modifiers, including ethnicity, LVEF classification, endpoints, and study design. Each 1% decrease in LVEF was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03), and this association remained significant after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of this association in various settings. In the multivariable meta-regression, studies with lower mean LVEF demonstrated a stronger association between reduced LVEF and adverse outcomes, but this association was attenuated or nonsignificant in cohorts with preserved systolic function. This suggests that the prognostic value of LVEF may depend on the baseline level of ventricular function and is subject to effect modification.

Conclusions: Reduced preprocedural LVEF is independently associated with worse prognosis after TAVI. These results highlight the continued importance of LVEF in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in TAVI candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信