静脉体外膜氧合移植成功的各项移植准备标准的预测性。

IF 1.1
Circulation reports Pub Date : 2025-08-27 eCollection Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0131
Keiichiro Iwasaki, Kentaro Ejiri, Hironobu Toda, Yoichi Takaya, Satoshi Akagi, Kazufumi Nakamura, Shinsuke Yuasa
{"title":"静脉体外膜氧合移植成功的各项移植准备标准的预测性。","authors":"Keiichiro Iwasaki, Kentaro Ejiri, Hironobu Toda, Yoichi Takaya, Satoshi Akagi, Kazufumi Nakamura, Shinsuke Yuasa","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, standardized readiness-to-explant criteria for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 37 patients with CS who were explanted from VA-ECMO at Okayama University Hospital from December 2018 to May 2024 to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each readiness-to-explant criterion for explant success or failure. Explant success was defined as 30-day survival without re-insertion of MCS. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at explant, weaning (1.0 to 1.5 L/min), and the off test (5 min). We assessed the predictive performance among parameters in successful or unsuccessful explantation of VA-ECMO using receiver operative characteristic curve analysis. The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) criteria (pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤18 mmHg, central venous pressure ≤12 mmHg, and cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) at the off test showed the highest predictability for successful explantation of VA-ECMO (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PAC criteria were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 38%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the PAC criteria at the off test may be the most appropriate algorithm for predicting successful explantation of VA-ECMO. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the present findings and to establish standardized VA-ECMO explantation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 10","pages":"896-903"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictivity of Each Readiness-to-Explant Criterion for Successful Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Explantation.\",\"authors\":\"Keiichiro Iwasaki, Kentaro Ejiri, Hironobu Toda, Yoichi Takaya, Satoshi Akagi, Kazufumi Nakamura, Shinsuke Yuasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, standardized readiness-to-explant criteria for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 37 patients with CS who were explanted from VA-ECMO at Okayama University Hospital from December 2018 to May 2024 to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each readiness-to-explant criterion for explant success or failure. Explant success was defined as 30-day survival without re-insertion of MCS. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at explant, weaning (1.0 to 1.5 L/min), and the off test (5 min). We assessed the predictive performance among parameters in successful or unsuccessful explantation of VA-ECMO using receiver operative characteristic curve analysis. The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) criteria (pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤18 mmHg, central venous pressure ≤12 mmHg, and cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) at the off test showed the highest predictability for successful explantation of VA-ECMO (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PAC criteria were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 38%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the PAC criteria at the off test may be the most appropriate algorithm for predicting successful explantation of VA-ECMO. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the present findings and to establish standardized VA-ECMO explantation practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"896-903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临时机械循环支持(tMCS)的使用彻底改变了心源性休克(CS)的治疗。然而,静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)的标准化移植准备标准尚未建立。方法和结果:我们对2018年12月至2024年5月在冈山大学医院从VA-ECMO中取出的37例CS患者进行了回顾性分析,以评估每种移植准备标准对移植成功或失败的诊断性能。外植体成功的定义是没有重新插入MCS的30天存活。在植体、断奶(1.0 ~ 1.5 L/min)和关闭试验(5 min)时评估血流动力学参数。我们使用受试者操作特征曲线分析来评估VA-ECMO外植成功或不成功的参数的预测性能。off试验时肺动脉导管(PAC)标准(肺动脉楔压≤18 mmHg,中心静脉压≤12 mmHg,心脏指数≥2.2 L/min/m2)显示VA-ECMO成功植入的最高可预测性(接受者工作特征曲线下面积0.83;95%置信区间0.71-0.96)。PAC标准的敏感性为67%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为38%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,off试验的PAC标准可能是预测VA-ECMO成功移植的最合适算法。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证目前的发现,并建立标准化的VA-ECMO移植实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictivity of Each Readiness-to-Explant Criterion for Successful Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Explantation.

Background: The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, standardized readiness-to-explant criteria for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have not been established.

Methods and results: We performed a retrospective analysis of 37 patients with CS who were explanted from VA-ECMO at Okayama University Hospital from December 2018 to May 2024 to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each readiness-to-explant criterion for explant success or failure. Explant success was defined as 30-day survival without re-insertion of MCS. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at explant, weaning (1.0 to 1.5 L/min), and the off test (5 min). We assessed the predictive performance among parameters in successful or unsuccessful explantation of VA-ECMO using receiver operative characteristic curve analysis. The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) criteria (pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤18 mmHg, central venous pressure ≤12 mmHg, and cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m2) at the off test showed the highest predictability for successful explantation of VA-ECMO (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PAC criteria were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 38%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the PAC criteria at the off test may be the most appropriate algorithm for predicting successful explantation of VA-ECMO. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the present findings and to establish standardized VA-ECMO explantation practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信