在台湾中部某医疗中心,肌肉减少症比骨质疏松症更能预测全因死亡率。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S548332
Pei-Iun Hsieh, Shih-Yi Lin, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Shih-Ming Huang, Hsin-Ti Huang, Shuo-Chun Weng
{"title":"在台湾中部某医疗中心,肌肉减少症比骨质疏松症更能预测全因死亡率。","authors":"Pei-Iun Hsieh, Shih-Yi Lin, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Shih-Ming Huang, Hsin-Ti Huang, Shuo-Chun Weng","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S548332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia (SP) and osteoporosis (OP) both pose higher risks for adverse health outcomes. This study explored the relationship among sarcopenia, osteoporosis and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort utilized a tertiary-hospital-based cohort during the years from 2018 to 2024. Patients received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Osteoporosis was diagnosed when T-scores of <-2.5 were determined at the L-spine or femoral neck. Sarcopenia was defined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria: low muscle strength, low physical performance, and a low appendicular skeletal mass index. We utilized the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves to depict observed time to mortality. Post-hoc analysis was applied for subgroup comparison and statistical power calculation. Interaction terms sensitivity analysis was used for analyzing mutually exclusive groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients (median age [interquartile range] 68.7 [52.8-80.7] years; 72.3% women) were analyzed. At baseline, 15.6% had SP alone, 23.1% had OP alone, and 14.3% had both conditions. Over median 0.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-1.4) years of follow-up, 24 deaths occurred. Older age, multimorbidity, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis were significantly associated with higher mortality. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and multimorbidity, sarcopenia alone was a stronger predictor of mortality compared to osteoporosis alone (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34 vs 3.99), and the mortality HR was 7.34 for sarcopenia with or without osteoporosis higher than 3.99 for osteoporosis with/without sarcopenia. Interaction analysis was not feasible in the four-group comparison, as the interaction term overlapped with the 'both sarcopenia and osteoporosis' group; in the other three groups, the SP×OP interaction was not significant. SP patients were more likely to be older, male, and have lower body mass index, total tissue, and lean mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that sarcopenia may be a more important predictor of mortality than osteoporosis in patients, highlighting the need for muscle health assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"1681-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenia as a Stronger Predictor for All-Cause Mortality Than Osteoporosis in a Medical Center in Central Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Iun Hsieh, Shih-Yi Lin, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Shih-Ming Huang, Hsin-Ti Huang, Shuo-Chun Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CIA.S548332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sarcopenia (SP) and osteoporosis (OP) both pose higher risks for adverse health outcomes. This study explored the relationship among sarcopenia, osteoporosis and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort utilized a tertiary-hospital-based cohort during the years from 2018 to 2024. Patients received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Osteoporosis was diagnosed when T-scores of <-2.5 were determined at the L-spine or femoral neck. Sarcopenia was defined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria: low muscle strength, low physical performance, and a low appendicular skeletal mass index. We utilized the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves to depict observed time to mortality. Post-hoc analysis was applied for subgroup comparison and statistical power calculation. Interaction terms sensitivity analysis was used for analyzing mutually exclusive groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients (median age [interquartile range] 68.7 [52.8-80.7] years; 72.3% women) were analyzed. At baseline, 15.6% had SP alone, 23.1% had OP alone, and 14.3% had both conditions. Over median 0.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-1.4) years of follow-up, 24 deaths occurred. Older age, multimorbidity, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis were significantly associated with higher mortality. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and multimorbidity, sarcopenia alone was a stronger predictor of mortality compared to osteoporosis alone (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34 vs 3.99), and the mortality HR was 7.34 for sarcopenia with or without osteoporosis higher than 3.99 for osteoporosis with/without sarcopenia. Interaction analysis was not feasible in the four-group comparison, as the interaction term overlapped with the 'both sarcopenia and osteoporosis' group; in the other three groups, the SP×OP interaction was not significant. SP patients were more likely to be older, male, and have lower body mass index, total tissue, and lean mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that sarcopenia may be a more important predictor of mortality than osteoporosis in patients, highlighting the need for muscle health assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"1681-1692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S548332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S548332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨骼肌减少症(SP)和骨质疏松症(OP)都有较高的不良健康结局风险。本研究探讨了肌肉减少症、骨质疏松症与全因死亡率之间的关系。患者和方法:该回顾性队列采用了2018年至2024年期间以三级医院为基础的队列。患者接受双能x线吸收仪扫描。结果:共分析545例患者(中位年龄[四分位数间距]68.7[52.8-80.7]岁,其中72.3%为女性)。在基线时,15.6%的患者单独患有SP, 23.1%的患者单独患有OP, 14.3%的患者同时患有两种疾病。在中位随访0.7年(四分位数间距= 0.2-1.4年)期间,发生了24例死亡。年龄较大、多病、肌肉减少症和骨质疏松症与较高的死亡率显著相关。在调整年龄和多发病因素的多变量分析中,与骨质疏松症相比,单独的肌肉减少症是更强的死亡率预测因子(风险比[HR] 7.34 vs 3.99),伴有或不伴有骨质疏松症的肌肉减少症的死亡率HR为7.34,高于伴有或不伴有肌肉减少症的骨质疏松症的死亡率HR为3.99。相互作用分析在四组比较中是不可行的,因为相互作用术语与“肌肉减少症和骨质疏松症”组重叠;在其他三组中,SP×OP相互作用不显著。SP患者多为年龄较大的男性,身体质量指数、总组织和瘦质量较低。结论:这些发现表明,肌肉减少症可能是比骨质疏松症更重要的死亡率预测指标,强调了对肌肉健康评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sarcopenia as a Stronger Predictor for All-Cause Mortality Than Osteoporosis in a Medical Center in Central Taiwan.

Sarcopenia as a Stronger Predictor for All-Cause Mortality Than Osteoporosis in a Medical Center in Central Taiwan.

Sarcopenia as a Stronger Predictor for All-Cause Mortality Than Osteoporosis in a Medical Center in Central Taiwan.

Purpose: Sarcopenia (SP) and osteoporosis (OP) both pose higher risks for adverse health outcomes. This study explored the relationship among sarcopenia, osteoporosis and all-cause mortality.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort utilized a tertiary-hospital-based cohort during the years from 2018 to 2024. Patients received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Osteoporosis was diagnosed when T-scores of <-2.5 were determined at the L-spine or femoral neck. Sarcopenia was defined using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria: low muscle strength, low physical performance, and a low appendicular skeletal mass index. We utilized the Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves to depict observed time to mortality. Post-hoc analysis was applied for subgroup comparison and statistical power calculation. Interaction terms sensitivity analysis was used for analyzing mutually exclusive groups.

Results: A total of 545 patients (median age [interquartile range] 68.7 [52.8-80.7] years; 72.3% women) were analyzed. At baseline, 15.6% had SP alone, 23.1% had OP alone, and 14.3% had both conditions. Over median 0.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-1.4) years of follow-up, 24 deaths occurred. Older age, multimorbidity, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis were significantly associated with higher mortality. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and multimorbidity, sarcopenia alone was a stronger predictor of mortality compared to osteoporosis alone (hazard ratio [HR] 7.34 vs 3.99), and the mortality HR was 7.34 for sarcopenia with or without osteoporosis higher than 3.99 for osteoporosis with/without sarcopenia. Interaction analysis was not feasible in the four-group comparison, as the interaction term overlapped with the 'both sarcopenia and osteoporosis' group; in the other three groups, the SP×OP interaction was not significant. SP patients were more likely to be older, male, and have lower body mass index, total tissue, and lean mass.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that sarcopenia may be a more important predictor of mortality than osteoporosis in patients, highlighting the need for muscle health assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信