文学作为镜头:通过虚构和事实调查研究诚信的制度失灵。

IF 1.5 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Christian J Wiedermann
{"title":"文学作为镜头:通过虚构和事实调查研究诚信的制度失灵。","authors":"Christian J Wiedermann","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature as a Lens: Investigating Institutional Failures in Research Integrity through Fiction and Fact.\",\"authors\":\"Christian J Wiedermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10477-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Boldt丑闻是全球记录在案的最大的研究不端案件之一,造成了研究监管方面的重大机构失灵。在德国吉ßen的Justus Liebig大学,这些系统性问题在导致广泛的数据伪造和道德违规方面发挥了关键作用。本诺·冯·鲍曼(Benno von Bormann)是约阿希姆·博尔特(Joachim Boldt)参与不当行为的前合作者,随后创作了半虚构的小说《医院》(Das Hospital),描绘了医院环境中的等级权力动态和道德困境。这篇书评探讨了冯·鲍曼的叙述如何与助长博尔特丑闻的制度性弱点相对应。通过比较Gießen大学调查报告的见解(总结于公开来源)和Das医院的主题,提供了对机构责任的独特跨学科分析。双管齐下的方法揭示了可能鼓励不道德研究行为的系统条件,可能导致在此类行为明显普遍的领域和学科中相应的研究退出模式。本研究的结论是重新审视提高科研管理透明度、问责制和文化变革的方法。这强调了将文献分析与机构的事实检查相结合的重要性,以解决维护研究诚信的持续问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literature as a Lens: Investigating Institutional Failures in Research Integrity through Fiction and Fact.

The Boldt scandal, one of the largest documented cases of research misconduct globally, caused significant institutional failures in research oversight. These systemic issues at Justus Liebig University in Gießen, Germany played a critical role in enabling widespread data falsification and ethical violations. Benno von Bormann, a former collaborator of Joachim Boldt involved in the misconduct, subsequently authored the semi-fictional novel Das Hospital, which depicts hierarchical power dynamics and ethical dilemmas within a hospital setting. This book review examines how von Bormann's narrative parallels the documented institutional weaknesses that facilitated the Boldt scandal. By comparing insights from the University of Gießen's investigation report, as summarized in publicly available sources, and the themes in Das Hospital, a unique interdisciplinary analysis of institutional responsibility is offered. The twin-pronged approach sheds light on the systemic conditions that may encourage unethical research behaviours, potentially leading to corresponding patterns of research withdrawals in areas and disciplines where such practices are notably prevalent. This study concludes by revisiting approaches to enhance transparency, accountability, and cultural changes in research management. This underscores the importance of combining literary analysis with factual examination of institutions to tackle ongoing issues in upholding research integrity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信