{"title":"不同种族的心理健康群体对电子健康记录的看法:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Ammarah Ikram, Sahdia Parveen, Eleftheria Vaportzis","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.10063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in mental health contexts has been slow. Reasons for this include concerns from healthcare professionals regarding the collection of sensitive information and the stigma associated with mental health services. Despite the low uptake of EHRs, the benefits include patients feeling empowered and in control of their own treatment. However, ethnically diverse groups often access mental health services through crisis pathways and have been found to disengage with EHRs. The aim of this review was to explore ethnically diverse groups' perceptions of the utility of mental health EHRs and establish perceived barriers and facilitators to access. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Included papers mentioned ethnically diverse groups from the 37 listed countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and included service users, clients or patients accessing EHRs in mental healthcare settings. Papers were required to be published between 2009 and 2025. Eight papers met all criteria for inclusion, and three themes emerged: language barriers to EHR access, lack of access to technology and perceived impact of EHRs on access to care. Language barriers to EHR access, no access to technology and stigma were significant issues for ethnically diverse groups due to concerns about who has access to the electronic health data. Benefits of accessing EHRs included easier and efficient access to records. EHRs are critical for modern health systems and further work is required to improve EHRs usage in mental health systems for ethnically diverse groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of electronic health records by ethnically diverse groups in mental health: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Ammarah Ikram, Sahdia Parveen, Eleftheria Vaportzis\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmh.2025.10063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in mental health contexts has been slow. Reasons for this include concerns from healthcare professionals regarding the collection of sensitive information and the stigma associated with mental health services. Despite the low uptake of EHRs, the benefits include patients feeling empowered and in control of their own treatment. However, ethnically diverse groups often access mental health services through crisis pathways and have been found to disengage with EHRs. The aim of this review was to explore ethnically diverse groups' perceptions of the utility of mental health EHRs and establish perceived barriers and facilitators to access. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Included papers mentioned ethnically diverse groups from the 37 listed countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and included service users, clients or patients accessing EHRs in mental healthcare settings. Papers were required to be published between 2009 and 2025. Eight papers met all criteria for inclusion, and three themes emerged: language barriers to EHR access, lack of access to technology and perceived impact of EHRs on access to care. Language barriers to EHR access, no access to technology and stigma were significant issues for ethnically diverse groups due to concerns about who has access to the electronic health data. Benefits of accessing EHRs included easier and efficient access to records. EHRs are critical for modern health systems and further work is required to improve EHRs usage in mental health systems for ethnically diverse groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电子健康记录(EHRs)在精神卫生领域的实施进展缓慢。造成这种情况的原因包括卫生保健专业人员对收集敏感信息和与精神卫生服务有关的耻辱的担忧。尽管电子病历的使用率很低,但其好处包括患者感到被赋予了权力,并能控制自己的治疗。然而,不同种族的群体往往通过危机途径获得精神卫生服务,并被发现不参与电子病历。本综述的目的是探讨不同种族群体对心理健康电子病历效用的看法,并建立可感知的障碍和促进因素。检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Scopus、PsycINFO、PubMed和Web of Science。收录的论文提到了来自经济合作与发展组织37个国家的不同种族群体,并包括在精神卫生保健机构访问电子病历的服务使用者、客户或患者。论文必须在2009年至2025年之间发表。8篇论文符合所有纳入标准,并出现了三个主题:获取电子病历的语言障碍、缺乏获得技术的途径以及电子病历对获得医疗服务的感知影响。获取电子健康档案的语言障碍、无法获得技术和污名化是多族裔群体面临的重大问题,因为他们担心谁能获得电子健康数据。访问电子病历的好处包括更容易和有效地访问记录。电子病历对现代卫生系统至关重要,需要进一步开展工作,以改善不同种族群体精神卫生系统中电子病历的使用。
Perceptions of electronic health records by ethnically diverse groups in mental health: A systematic literature review.
The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in mental health contexts has been slow. Reasons for this include concerns from healthcare professionals regarding the collection of sensitive information and the stigma associated with mental health services. Despite the low uptake of EHRs, the benefits include patients feeling empowered and in control of their own treatment. However, ethnically diverse groups often access mental health services through crisis pathways and have been found to disengage with EHRs. The aim of this review was to explore ethnically diverse groups' perceptions of the utility of mental health EHRs and establish perceived barriers and facilitators to access. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Included papers mentioned ethnically diverse groups from the 37 listed countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and included service users, clients or patients accessing EHRs in mental healthcare settings. Papers were required to be published between 2009 and 2025. Eight papers met all criteria for inclusion, and three themes emerged: language barriers to EHR access, lack of access to technology and perceived impact of EHRs on access to care. Language barriers to EHR access, no access to technology and stigma were significant issues for ethnically diverse groups due to concerns about who has access to the electronic health data. Benefits of accessing EHRs included easier and efficient access to records. EHRs are critical for modern health systems and further work is required to improve EHRs usage in mental health systems for ethnically diverse groups.
期刊介绍:
lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.