数字PET/CT中TOF+PSF重建性能的高级监测:uMI 550评估的临床意义

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M El Kafhali, M Tahmasbi, A Rahmouni, M Khalis, A El Moutaoukkil, R Sebihi, A El Kessioui
{"title":"数字PET/CT中TOF+PSF重建性能的高级监测:uMI 550评估的临床意义","authors":"M El Kafhali, M Tahmasbi, A Rahmouni, M Khalis, A El Moutaoukkil, R Sebihi, A El Kessioui","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in digital PET/CT technology have enabled more precise quantification and image quality optimization. This study evaluated the reconstruction performance of the uMI 550 digital PET/CT system using standardized phantoms, focusing on reconstruction algorithms incorporating Time-of-Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling. Unlike prior uMI 550 evaluations, this study integrates uncertainty-based analysis and longitudinal QC correlations to determine optimal reconstruction conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Performance assessments followed NEMA NU 2-2007 protocols with a NEMA IEC image quality phantom and QC phantoms. The analysis examined contrast recovery, image noise, and standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics (SUVmax (single hottest voxel), SUVmean (average uptake in a region), and SUVpeak (average uptake within a fixed 1 cm<sup>3</sup> around the hottest area)), under varying reconstruction settings, with integration of uncertainty modeling and quality-control (QC) correlations. Count-rate performance was assessed using Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and true count rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrast recovery rose from 89.1 % at iteration 1-152.2 % at iteration 4, after which further iterations increased noise without added benefit. SUVmean remained stable (1.01 ± 0.03), SUVpeak converged rapidly with minimal sensitivity to reconstruction, while SUVmax overshot to 1.34 by iteration 6 due to edge artifacts. Count-rate analysis showed peak NECR at 17.2 kBq/mL and maximum true count rate of 479.4 kcps at 26.3 kBq/mL, with quantification errors consistently below 5 %. Correlation analysis (r > 0.85) identified SUVpeak, SUVmean, NECR, and contrast recovery as the most influential QC parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUVpeak emerged as the most robust quantitative biomarker, providing practical guidance for protocol optimization, harmonized PET/CT workflows, and long-term system monitoring.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Adopting evidence-based reconstruction strategies and consistent QC can improve diagnostic confidence and standardization in clinical PET/CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 6","pages":"103192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced monitoring of TOF+PSF reconstruction performance in digital PET/CT: Clinical implications from the uMI 550 evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"M El Kafhali, M Tahmasbi, A Rahmouni, M Khalis, A El Moutaoukkil, R Sebihi, A El Kessioui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in digital PET/CT technology have enabled more precise quantification and image quality optimization. This study evaluated the reconstruction performance of the uMI 550 digital PET/CT system using standardized phantoms, focusing on reconstruction algorithms incorporating Time-of-Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling. Unlike prior uMI 550 evaluations, this study integrates uncertainty-based analysis and longitudinal QC correlations to determine optimal reconstruction conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Performance assessments followed NEMA NU 2-2007 protocols with a NEMA IEC image quality phantom and QC phantoms. The analysis examined contrast recovery, image noise, and standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics (SUVmax (single hottest voxel), SUVmean (average uptake in a region), and SUVpeak (average uptake within a fixed 1 cm<sup>3</sup> around the hottest area)), under varying reconstruction settings, with integration of uncertainty modeling and quality-control (QC) correlations. Count-rate performance was assessed using Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and true count rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrast recovery rose from 89.1 % at iteration 1-152.2 % at iteration 4, after which further iterations increased noise without added benefit. SUVmean remained stable (1.01 ± 0.03), SUVpeak converged rapidly with minimal sensitivity to reconstruction, while SUVmax overshot to 1.34 by iteration 6 due to edge artifacts. Count-rate analysis showed peak NECR at 17.2 kBq/mL and maximum true count rate of 479.4 kcps at 26.3 kBq/mL, with quantification errors consistently below 5 %. Correlation analysis (r > 0.85) identified SUVpeak, SUVmean, NECR, and contrast recovery as the most influential QC parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUVpeak emerged as the most robust quantitative biomarker, providing practical guidance for protocol optimization, harmonized PET/CT workflows, and long-term system monitoring.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Adopting evidence-based reconstruction strategies and consistent QC can improve diagnostic confidence and standardization in clinical PET/CT imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"103192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字PET/CT技术的进步使更精确的量化和图像质量优化成为可能。本研究评估了uMI 550数字PET/CT系统使用标准化幻影的重建性能,重点研究了结合飞行时间(TOF)和点扩散函数(PSF)建模的重建算法。与之前的uMI 550评估不同,本研究整合了基于不确定性的分析和纵向QC相关性来确定最佳重建条件。方法:使用NEMA IEC图像质量模型和QC模型,按照NEMA NU 2-2007协议进行性能评估。该分析检查了不同重建设置下的对比度恢复、图像噪声和标准化摄取值(SUV)指标(SUVmax(单个最热体素)、SUVmean(一个区域的平均摄取)和SUVpeak(在最热区域周围固定的1 cm3内的平均摄取),并集成了不确定性建模和质量控制(QC)相关性。使用噪声等效计数率(NECR)和真实计数率评估计数率性能。结果:对比度恢复从迭代1-迭代的89.1%上升到迭代4的152.2%,之后的进一步迭代增加了噪声,但没有增加效益。SUVmean保持稳定(1.01±0.03),SUVpeak快速收敛,对重建的敏感性最小,而SUVmax由于边缘伪影而在第6次迭代时超过1.34。计数率分析显示,峰值NECR为17.2 kBq/mL,最大真计数率为479.4 kcps, 26.3 kBq/mL,定量误差始终低于5%。相关分析(r > 0.85)确定SUVpeak、SUVmean、NECR和对比度恢复是影响最大的QC参数。结论:SUVpeak是最可靠的定量生物标志物,为方案优化、PET/CT工作流程协调和长期系统监测提供了实用指导。实践意义:采用循证重建策略和一致的质量控制可以提高临床PET/CT成像的诊断信心和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced monitoring of TOF+PSF reconstruction performance in digital PET/CT: Clinical implications from the uMI 550 evaluation.

Introduction: Advancements in digital PET/CT technology have enabled more precise quantification and image quality optimization. This study evaluated the reconstruction performance of the uMI 550 digital PET/CT system using standardized phantoms, focusing on reconstruction algorithms incorporating Time-of-Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling. Unlike prior uMI 550 evaluations, this study integrates uncertainty-based analysis and longitudinal QC correlations to determine optimal reconstruction conditions.

Methods: Performance assessments followed NEMA NU 2-2007 protocols with a NEMA IEC image quality phantom and QC phantoms. The analysis examined contrast recovery, image noise, and standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics (SUVmax (single hottest voxel), SUVmean (average uptake in a region), and SUVpeak (average uptake within a fixed 1 cm3 around the hottest area)), under varying reconstruction settings, with integration of uncertainty modeling and quality-control (QC) correlations. Count-rate performance was assessed using Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and true count rate.

Results: Contrast recovery rose from 89.1 % at iteration 1-152.2 % at iteration 4, after which further iterations increased noise without added benefit. SUVmean remained stable (1.01 ± 0.03), SUVpeak converged rapidly with minimal sensitivity to reconstruction, while SUVmax overshot to 1.34 by iteration 6 due to edge artifacts. Count-rate analysis showed peak NECR at 17.2 kBq/mL and maximum true count rate of 479.4 kcps at 26.3 kBq/mL, with quantification errors consistently below 5 %. Correlation analysis (r > 0.85) identified SUVpeak, SUVmean, NECR, and contrast recovery as the most influential QC parameters.

Conclusion: SUVpeak emerged as the most robust quantitative biomarker, providing practical guidance for protocol optimization, harmonized PET/CT workflows, and long-term system monitoring.

Implications for practice: Adopting evidence-based reconstruction strategies and consistent QC can improve diagnostic confidence and standardization in clinical PET/CT imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信