氧化铝、羟基磷灰石及其组合在空气磨损系统中牙釉质腔切割的比较评价:体外扫描电镜研究。

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Saqib Ali, Ahmed Talal, Imran Farooq
{"title":"氧化铝、羟基磷灰石及其组合在空气磨损系统中牙釉质腔切割的比较评价:体外扫描电镜研究。","authors":"Saqib Ali, Ahmed Talal, Imran Farooq","doi":"10.1002/jemt.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental air abrasion is a minimally invasive technique using abrasive particles to remove carious tooth structure. Alumina particles, commonly preferred due to their cutting efficiency, pose toxicity risks if inhaled. This study evaluated hydroxyapatite (HA) and an alumina + HA combination as alternatives to alumina for enamel cutting efficiency. Extracted human third molars with sound enamel (N = 30) were divided into three groups: (1) alumina 29 μm (control), (2) HA, and (3) alumina + HA. Morphological analysis of powders and cavity cutting performance were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Alumina particles were coarse and angular, HA particles were rounded, and alumina + HA showed mixed morphology on SEM analysis. Cavity cutting results showed alumina produced the deepest cavities (mean: 2.5 mm), followed by alumina + HA (mean: 2.12 mm) and HA alone (mean: 0.75 mm). Statistically significant differences were detected between alumina and HA (p = 0.0003) and alumina + HA and HA (p = 0.008), but no significant differences between alumina and alumina + HA (p > 0.99) were observed. SEM analysis of the shape of the cavities revealed cylindrical shapes for alumina and alumina + HA groups and conical shapes for the HA group. The alumina + HA combination demonstrated effective enamel cutting efficiency while the presence of HA could be potentially useful for remineralization, presenting a safer alternative to pure alumina. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Alumina, Hydroxyapatite, and Their Combination for Dental Enamel Cavity Cutting in an Air Abrasion System: An In Vitro SEM Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saqib Ali, Ahmed Talal, Imran Farooq\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jemt.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dental air abrasion is a minimally invasive technique using abrasive particles to remove carious tooth structure. Alumina particles, commonly preferred due to their cutting efficiency, pose toxicity risks if inhaled. This study evaluated hydroxyapatite (HA) and an alumina + HA combination as alternatives to alumina for enamel cutting efficiency. Extracted human third molars with sound enamel (N = 30) were divided into three groups: (1) alumina 29 μm (control), (2) HA, and (3) alumina + HA. Morphological analysis of powders and cavity cutting performance were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Alumina particles were coarse and angular, HA particles were rounded, and alumina + HA showed mixed morphology on SEM analysis. Cavity cutting results showed alumina produced the deepest cavities (mean: 2.5 mm), followed by alumina + HA (mean: 2.12 mm) and HA alone (mean: 0.75 mm). Statistically significant differences were detected between alumina and HA (p = 0.0003) and alumina + HA and HA (p = 0.008), but no significant differences between alumina and alumina + HA (p > 0.99) were observed. SEM analysis of the shape of the cavities revealed cylindrical shapes for alumina and alumina + HA groups and conical shapes for the HA group. The alumina + HA combination demonstrated effective enamel cutting efficiency while the presence of HA could be potentially useful for remineralization, presenting a safer alternative to pure alumina. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙齿空气磨蚀是一种利用磨料颗粒去除牙齿龋齿结构的微创技术。氧化铝颗粒,由于其切割效率,通常是首选,如果吸入会造成毒性风险。本研究评估了羟基磷灰石(HA)和氧化铝+ HA组合作为氧化铝的替代品,以提高搪瓷切割效率。将30颗正常牙釉质提取的人第三磨牙分为(1)氧化铝29 μm组(对照组)、(2)透明质酸组和(3)氧化铝+透明质酸组。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对粉末形态分析和腔切割性能进行了评估。SEM分析显示,氧化铝颗粒粗而有棱角,透明质酸颗粒圆润,氧化铝+透明质酸呈混合形态。空腔切割结果显示,氧化铝产生的空腔最深(平均为2.5 mm),其次是氧化铝+ HA(平均为2.12 mm)和单独HA(平均为0.75 mm)。氧化铝与HA之间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0003),氧化铝+ HA与HA之间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.008),氧化铝与氧化铝+ HA之间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.99)。扫描电镜分析显示,氧化铝和氧化铝+ HA基团为圆柱形,HA基团为圆锥形。氧化铝+透明质酸的组合显示出有效的珐琅质切割效率,而透明质酸的存在可能有助于再矿化,提供了一种比纯氧化铝更安全的替代品。建议进一步的体内研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Alumina, Hydroxyapatite, and Their Combination for Dental Enamel Cavity Cutting in an Air Abrasion System: An In Vitro SEM Study.

Dental air abrasion is a minimally invasive technique using abrasive particles to remove carious tooth structure. Alumina particles, commonly preferred due to their cutting efficiency, pose toxicity risks if inhaled. This study evaluated hydroxyapatite (HA) and an alumina + HA combination as alternatives to alumina for enamel cutting efficiency. Extracted human third molars with sound enamel (N = 30) were divided into three groups: (1) alumina 29 μm (control), (2) HA, and (3) alumina + HA. Morphological analysis of powders and cavity cutting performance were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Alumina particles were coarse and angular, HA particles were rounded, and alumina + HA showed mixed morphology on SEM analysis. Cavity cutting results showed alumina produced the deepest cavities (mean: 2.5 mm), followed by alumina + HA (mean: 2.12 mm) and HA alone (mean: 0.75 mm). Statistically significant differences were detected between alumina and HA (p = 0.0003) and alumina + HA and HA (p = 0.008), but no significant differences between alumina and alumina + HA (p > 0.99) were observed. SEM analysis of the shape of the cavities revealed cylindrical shapes for alumina and alumina + HA groups and conical shapes for the HA group. The alumina + HA combination demonstrated effective enamel cutting efficiency while the presence of HA could be potentially useful for remineralization, presenting a safer alternative to pure alumina. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信