系统回顾治疗扁平苔藓、额部纤维化性脱发和盘状红斑狼疮的程序模式。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ali Ezzatollahi Tanha, Yekta Ghane, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"系统回顾治疗扁平苔藓、额部纤维化性脱发和盘状红斑狼疮的程序模式。","authors":"Ali Ezzatollahi Tanha, Yekta Ghane, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04704-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lichen planopilaris (LPP), frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias causing irreversible follicular loss. Procedural therapies have been proposed to control inflammation, remodel scarred tissue, and, occasionally, promote hair regrowth. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus through July 28, 2025, selecting original studies of procedural interventions for LPP, FFA, and DLE. We assessed methodological quality using NIH and Murad et al. tools. Thirty-eight studies comprising 411 patients were included, reporting lasers/light therapies, platelet-derived products, adipose/exosome injections, low-level light therapy (LLLT), intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), carboxytherapy, microneedling, and hair transplantation. Outcomes reported were both subjective (patient-reported symptom change, global physician assessment) and objective (LPPAI/FFASS activity scores, terminal hair counts, hair shaft diameter, and photographic density). Platelet products most consistently reduced activity scores and improved symptoms; several reports also documented increases in terminal hair counts or shaft diameter. LLLT led to improved patient-reported outcomes and modest, measurable gains in hair counts/thickness in small series. ILCS reliably achieved disease stabilization and reductions in activity scores but yielded inconsistent objective regrowth. Hair transplantation resulted in good early cosmetic density in quiescent patients, with several studies documenting quantitative density at 6-24 months but progressive graft loss by 3-5 years. Adipose and exosome injections showed promising case-level increases in density/thickness, although the results remained preliminary. Adverse events were generally mild and procedure-specific. In hair transplantation, long-term graft durability remains a major concern. Procedural modalities may serve as useful treatments for symptom control and limited regrowth in selected patients with scarring alopecia. These modalities are best considered adjuncts to medical therapy pending standardized, controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of procedural modalities in the treatment of lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and discoid lupus erythematosus.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ezzatollahi Tanha, Yekta Ghane, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Azadeh Goodarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04704-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lichen planopilaris (LPP), frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias causing irreversible follicular loss. Procedural therapies have been proposed to control inflammation, remodel scarred tissue, and, occasionally, promote hair regrowth. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus through July 28, 2025, selecting original studies of procedural interventions for LPP, FFA, and DLE. We assessed methodological quality using NIH and Murad et al. tools. Thirty-eight studies comprising 411 patients were included, reporting lasers/light therapies, platelet-derived products, adipose/exosome injections, low-level light therapy (LLLT), intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), carboxytherapy, microneedling, and hair transplantation. Outcomes reported were both subjective (patient-reported symptom change, global physician assessment) and objective (LPPAI/FFASS activity scores, terminal hair counts, hair shaft diameter, and photographic density). Platelet products most consistently reduced activity scores and improved symptoms; several reports also documented increases in terminal hair counts or shaft diameter. LLLT led to improved patient-reported outcomes and modest, measurable gains in hair counts/thickness in small series. ILCS reliably achieved disease stabilization and reductions in activity scores but yielded inconsistent objective regrowth. Hair transplantation resulted in good early cosmetic density in quiescent patients, with several studies documenting quantitative density at 6-24 months but progressive graft loss by 3-5 years. Adipose and exosome injections showed promising case-level increases in density/thickness, although the results remained preliminary. Adverse events were generally mild and procedure-specific. In hair transplantation, long-term graft durability remains a major concern. Procedural modalities may serve as useful treatments for symptom control and limited regrowth in selected patients with scarring alopecia. These modalities are best considered adjuncts to medical therapy pending standardized, controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04704-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04704-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扁平苔藓(LPP)、额部纤维化性脱发(FFA)和盘状红斑狼疮(DLE)是淋巴细胞性瘢痕性脱发,导致不可逆的滤泡丢失。程序性治疗已被提出用于控制炎症、重塑疤痕组织,偶尔还可促进头发再生。我们对截至2025年7月28日的PubMed/Medline、Ovid Embase和Scopus进行了prisma引导的系统综述,选择了LPP、FFA和DLE的程序性干预的原始研究。我们使用NIH和Murad等人的工具评估方法学质量。38项研究包括411名患者,报告了激光/光治疗、血小板衍生产品、脂肪/外体注射、低水平光治疗(LLLT)、病灶内皮质类固醇(ILCS)、羧基治疗、微针和头发移植。报告的结果既有主观的(患者报告的症状变化、总体医师评估),也有客观的(LPPAI/FFASS活动评分、终末毛数、毛干直径和摄影密度)。血小板产品最一致地降低了活动评分和改善了症状;几份报告也记录了终末毛数或轴直径的增加。在小系列研究中,LLLT改善了患者报告的结果,并在头发计数/厚度方面获得了适度的、可测量的增益。ILCS可靠地实现了疾病的稳定和活动评分的降低,但产生了不一致的客观再生。毛发移植在静止患者中产生良好的早期美容密度,有几项研究记录了6-24个月的定量密度,但3-5年的移植物逐渐丧失。脂肪和外泌体注射显示出有希望的病例级密度/厚度增加,尽管结果仍是初步的。不良事件一般是轻微的和特定的程序。在头发移植中,长期的移植物耐久性仍然是主要的问题。程序模式可作为有效的治疗症状控制和有限再生的选择患者瘢痕性脱发。在标准化的对照试验之前,这些方式最好被认为是药物治疗的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of procedural modalities in the treatment of lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and discoid lupus erythematosus.

Lichen planopilaris (LPP), frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are lymphocytic cicatricial alopecias causing irreversible follicular loss. Procedural therapies have been proposed to control inflammation, remodel scarred tissue, and, occasionally, promote hair regrowth. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus through July 28, 2025, selecting original studies of procedural interventions for LPP, FFA, and DLE. We assessed methodological quality using NIH and Murad et al. tools. Thirty-eight studies comprising 411 patients were included, reporting lasers/light therapies, platelet-derived products, adipose/exosome injections, low-level light therapy (LLLT), intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), carboxytherapy, microneedling, and hair transplantation. Outcomes reported were both subjective (patient-reported symptom change, global physician assessment) and objective (LPPAI/FFASS activity scores, terminal hair counts, hair shaft diameter, and photographic density). Platelet products most consistently reduced activity scores and improved symptoms; several reports also documented increases in terminal hair counts or shaft diameter. LLLT led to improved patient-reported outcomes and modest, measurable gains in hair counts/thickness in small series. ILCS reliably achieved disease stabilization and reductions in activity scores but yielded inconsistent objective regrowth. Hair transplantation resulted in good early cosmetic density in quiescent patients, with several studies documenting quantitative density at 6-24 months but progressive graft loss by 3-5 years. Adipose and exosome injections showed promising case-level increases in density/thickness, although the results remained preliminary. Adverse events were generally mild and procedure-specific. In hair transplantation, long-term graft durability remains a major concern. Procedural modalities may serve as useful treatments for symptom control and limited regrowth in selected patients with scarring alopecia. These modalities are best considered adjuncts to medical therapy pending standardized, controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信