基于中西医结合治疗缺血性脑卒中病例系列的多重共线性下真实世界线性因果关系探索的混合方法

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zixin Han, Jianxin Chen, Cheng Yu, Chunyu Wang, Xinlin Li, Weici Zheng, Ziyan Gu, Juanjuan Sun, Shuangshuang Hou, Wentao Zhu
{"title":"基于中西医结合治疗缺血性脑卒中病例系列的多重共线性下真实世界线性因果关系探索的混合方法","authors":"Zixin Han, Jianxin Chen, Cheng Yu, Chunyu Wang, Xinlin Li, Weici Zheng, Ziyan Gu, Juanjuan Sun, Shuangshuang Hou, Wentao Zhu","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Integration of traditional Chinese and modern medicine (TCM-MM) aids rehabilitation of muscle strength among ischemic stroke (IS) survivors. However, it faces statistical challenges (e.g., multicollinearity, small sample) in the real-world setting. This study tried to provide an analytical framework for investigating linear causality with a retrospective small-sample case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original data was sourced from hospital information system and processed by many means. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to execute a self-controlled before-and-after comparison, before multiple linear regression (MLR) models were established for exploring prognostic factors of muscle strength improvement. Afterward, Bayesian networks (BN), mediation analysis and between-subjects effects tests were undertaken the detection of underlying multicollinearity sources progressively. Both clinical interpretability and model performance, containing R<sup>2</sup> and mean squared error (MSE), served as the indices for modelling comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Muscle strength was significantly improved among 112 post-IS patients after accepting TCM-MM therapies (p < 0.01). Initially, MLR analysis with 11 explanatory variables (EVs) (MLR_1) revealed a probable multicollinearity-driven bias, resulting in reduced interpretability. Consequently, we traced collinearity among EVs using a BN structure that provided clues to mediating and mutual effects for establishing MLR with interactions embracing 11 EVs (MLR_2). Eventually, MLR_2 demonstrated superior model performance (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.097, ΔMSE = -0.004), and better clinical interpretability. Whereas, we cannot deny a 1/3 probability of diminished statistical efficacy due to the small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study proposed a practically hybrid approach for exploring linear causality under multicollinearity using real-world small-sample data, which suggested that balancing model performance with clinical interpretability can resolve statistical trade-offs in modelling optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e70070"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Hybrid Approach for Exploring Real-World Linear Causality Under Multicollinearity Based on Ischemic Post-Stroke Case Series Treated With Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine Therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Zixin Han, Jianxin Chen, Cheng Yu, Chunyu Wang, Xinlin Li, Weici Zheng, Ziyan Gu, Juanjuan Sun, Shuangshuang Hou, Wentao Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jebm.70070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Integration of traditional Chinese and modern medicine (TCM-MM) aids rehabilitation of muscle strength among ischemic stroke (IS) survivors. However, it faces statistical challenges (e.g., multicollinearity, small sample) in the real-world setting. This study tried to provide an analytical framework for investigating linear causality with a retrospective small-sample case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original data was sourced from hospital information system and processed by many means. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to execute a self-controlled before-and-after comparison, before multiple linear regression (MLR) models were established for exploring prognostic factors of muscle strength improvement. Afterward, Bayesian networks (BN), mediation analysis and between-subjects effects tests were undertaken the detection of underlying multicollinearity sources progressively. Both clinical interpretability and model performance, containing R<sup>2</sup> and mean squared error (MSE), served as the indices for modelling comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Muscle strength was significantly improved among 112 post-IS patients after accepting TCM-MM therapies (p < 0.01). Initially, MLR analysis with 11 explanatory variables (EVs) (MLR_1) revealed a probable multicollinearity-driven bias, resulting in reduced interpretability. Consequently, we traced collinearity among EVs using a BN structure that provided clues to mediating and mutual effects for establishing MLR with interactions embracing 11 EVs (MLR_2). Eventually, MLR_2 demonstrated superior model performance (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.097, ΔMSE = -0.004), and better clinical interpretability. Whereas, we cannot deny a 1/3 probability of diminished statistical efficacy due to the small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study proposed a practically hybrid approach for exploring linear causality under multicollinearity using real-world small-sample data, which suggested that balancing model performance with clinical interpretability can resolve statistical trade-offs in modelling optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.70070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:中西医结合对缺血性脑卒中(IS)患者肌力康复的帮助。然而,在现实世界中,它面临着统计方面的挑战(例如,多重共线性,小样本)。本研究试图提供一个分析框架,通过回顾性的小样本案例系列来调查线性因果关系。方法:原始资料来源于医院信息系统,经多种手段处理。采用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验进行自我对照前后比较,然后建立多元线性回归(MLR)模型探讨肌力改善的预后因素。随后,通过贝叶斯网络(BN)、中介分析和被试间效应检验逐步检测潜在多重共线性源。临床可解释性和模型性能,包含R2和均方误差(MSE)作为建模比较的指标。结果:112例is后患者经中西医结合治疗后肌力明显改善(p < 0.01)。最初,包含11个解释变量(ev)的MLR分析(MLR_1)显示可能存在多重共线性驱动的偏差,导致可解释性降低。因此,我们利用BN结构追踪了ev之间的共线性,为建立包含11个ev (MLR_2)的相互作用的MLR提供了中介和相互作用的线索。最终,MLR_2表现出更好的模型性能(ΔR2 = 0.097, ΔMSE = -0.004)和更好的临床可解释性。然而,我们不能否认由于样本量小而导致统计有效性降低的概率为1/3。结论:我们的研究提出了一种实际的混合方法来探索多重共线性下的线性因果关系,使用现实世界的小样本数据,这表明平衡模型性能和临床可解释性可以解决模型优化中的统计权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Hybrid Approach for Exploring Real-World Linear Causality Under Multicollinearity Based on Ischemic Post-Stroke Case Series Treated With Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine Therapies.

Objective: Integration of traditional Chinese and modern medicine (TCM-MM) aids rehabilitation of muscle strength among ischemic stroke (IS) survivors. However, it faces statistical challenges (e.g., multicollinearity, small sample) in the real-world setting. This study tried to provide an analytical framework for investigating linear causality with a retrospective small-sample case series.

Methods: Original data was sourced from hospital information system and processed by many means. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to execute a self-controlled before-and-after comparison, before multiple linear regression (MLR) models were established for exploring prognostic factors of muscle strength improvement. Afterward, Bayesian networks (BN), mediation analysis and between-subjects effects tests were undertaken the detection of underlying multicollinearity sources progressively. Both clinical interpretability and model performance, containing R2 and mean squared error (MSE), served as the indices for modelling comparison.

Results: Muscle strength was significantly improved among 112 post-IS patients after accepting TCM-MM therapies (p < 0.01). Initially, MLR analysis with 11 explanatory variables (EVs) (MLR_1) revealed a probable multicollinearity-driven bias, resulting in reduced interpretability. Consequently, we traced collinearity among EVs using a BN structure that provided clues to mediating and mutual effects for establishing MLR with interactions embracing 11 EVs (MLR_2). Eventually, MLR_2 demonstrated superior model performance (ΔR2 = 0.097, ΔMSE = -0.004), and better clinical interpretability. Whereas, we cannot deny a 1/3 probability of diminished statistical efficacy due to the small sample size.

Conclusion: Our study proposed a practically hybrid approach for exploring linear causality under multicollinearity using real-world small-sample data, which suggested that balancing model performance with clinical interpretability can resolve statistical trade-offs in modelling optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信