英国药剂师是否为高级实践做好了准备?自我评估发展需要的横断面调查。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Stephen Doherty, Paul Forsyth, Petra Rauchhaus, Christine Bond, Susan Roberts, Jane Brown, Laura O'Loan, Fiona Marra, Joseph Oakley, Michele Sehrawat, Debra Roberts, Andrew Radley
{"title":"英国药剂师是否为高级实践做好了准备?自我评估发展需要的横断面调查。","authors":"Stephen Doherty, Paul Forsyth, Petra Rauchhaus, Christine Bond, Susan Roberts, Jane Brown, Laura O'Loan, Fiona Marra, Joseph Oakley, Michele Sehrawat, Debra Roberts, Andrew Radley","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has developed a new curriculum and credentialling process for advanced pharmacist practice. The aim of this study was to understand the self-reported advanced practice capability of UK pharmacists using this curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a cross-sectional electronic survey. The inclusion criterion was that the participants be registered pharmacists practising in the UK in any professional sector. Participants rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, their confidence that their current practice aligns to the described level in the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Core Advanced Curriculum. Predictors of overall confidence that their current practice aligned to all curriculum outcomes were analysed using binomial regression.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Nine hundred and eighty-eight pharmacists participated. The median age was 42 years; 75.2% were female and the median length of registration was 17 years. A low proportion of pharmacists reported confidence across all outcomes (19.8%). The research domain had the lowest self-reported confidence (26.9%). Other domains had higher levels of reported confidence: professional practice (40.9%); leadership and management (43.8%); person-centred care and collaboration (54.3%); and education (57.6%). The strongest predictors of overall confidence across the whole curriculum were completion of an advanced clinical assessment skills module, being a frequent prescriber, and self-identifying as an advanced practice pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of respondents self-reported confidence across the whole Core Advanced Curriculum. A strategy to develop and embed four pillar working for all pharmacists, as well as approaches to address systemic barriers for those working less than full-time may help deliver more 'advanced practice-ready' pharmacists.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are UK pharmacists ready for advanced-level practice? A cross-sectional survey of self-assessed development needs.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Doherty, Paul Forsyth, Petra Rauchhaus, Christine Bond, Susan Roberts, Jane Brown, Laura O'Loan, Fiona Marra, Joseph Oakley, Michele Sehrawat, Debra Roberts, Andrew Radley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijpp/riaf085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has developed a new curriculum and credentialling process for advanced pharmacist practice. The aim of this study was to understand the self-reported advanced practice capability of UK pharmacists using this curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a cross-sectional electronic survey. The inclusion criterion was that the participants be registered pharmacists practising in the UK in any professional sector. Participants rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, their confidence that their current practice aligns to the described level in the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Core Advanced Curriculum. Predictors of overall confidence that their current practice aligned to all curriculum outcomes were analysed using binomial regression.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Nine hundred and eighty-eight pharmacists participated. The median age was 42 years; 75.2% were female and the median length of registration was 17 years. A low proportion of pharmacists reported confidence across all outcomes (19.8%). The research domain had the lowest self-reported confidence (26.9%). Other domains had higher levels of reported confidence: professional practice (40.9%); leadership and management (43.8%); person-centred care and collaboration (54.3%); and education (57.6%). The strongest predictors of overall confidence across the whole curriculum were completion of an advanced clinical assessment skills module, being a frequent prescriber, and self-identifying as an advanced practice pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of respondents self-reported confidence across the whole Core Advanced Curriculum. A strategy to develop and embed four pillar working for all pharmacists, as well as approaches to address systemic barriers for those working less than full-time may help deliver more 'advanced practice-ready' pharmacists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:皇家药学会已经制定了一个新的课程和资格认证过程,为先进的药剂师实践。本研究的目的是了解自我报告先进的实践能力,英国药剂师使用该课程。方法:采用横断面电子调查法。纳入标准是参与者必须是在英国执业的注册药剂师。参与者评价,在5点李克特量表,他们的信心,他们目前的做法符合在皇家药学会核心高级课程所描述的水平。使用二项回归分析了他们当前实践与所有课程成果一致的总体信心预测因子。主要发现:988名药师参与。中位年龄为42岁;75.2%为女性,登记时间中位数为17年。报告对所有结果有信心的药剂师比例较低(19.8%)。研究领域的自我报告信心最低(26.9%)。其他领域报告的信心水平更高:专业实践(40.9%);领导和管理(43.8%);以人为本的护理和协作(54.3%);教育(57.6%)。在整个课程中,对整体信心最强的预测因素是完成高级临床评估技能模块,经常开处方,并自我认定为高级执业药剂师。结论:只有少数受访者自我报告了对整个核心高级课程的信心。为所有药剂师制定和纳入四大支柱工作的战略,以及为非全职工作的药剂师解决系统性障碍的方法,可能有助于培养更多的“高级实践准备”药剂师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are UK pharmacists ready for advanced-level practice? A cross-sectional survey of self-assessed development needs.

Objectives: The Royal Pharmaceutical Society has developed a new curriculum and credentialling process for advanced pharmacist practice. The aim of this study was to understand the self-reported advanced practice capability of UK pharmacists using this curriculum.

Methods: The study was a cross-sectional electronic survey. The inclusion criterion was that the participants be registered pharmacists practising in the UK in any professional sector. Participants rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, their confidence that their current practice aligns to the described level in the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Core Advanced Curriculum. Predictors of overall confidence that their current practice aligned to all curriculum outcomes were analysed using binomial regression.

Key findings: Nine hundred and eighty-eight pharmacists participated. The median age was 42 years; 75.2% were female and the median length of registration was 17 years. A low proportion of pharmacists reported confidence across all outcomes (19.8%). The research domain had the lowest self-reported confidence (26.9%). Other domains had higher levels of reported confidence: professional practice (40.9%); leadership and management (43.8%); person-centred care and collaboration (54.3%); and education (57.6%). The strongest predictors of overall confidence across the whole curriculum were completion of an advanced clinical assessment skills module, being a frequent prescriber, and self-identifying as an advanced practice pharmacist.

Conclusion: Only a minority of respondents self-reported confidence across the whole Core Advanced Curriculum. A strategy to develop and embed four pillar working for all pharmacists, as well as approaches to address systemic barriers for those working less than full-time may help deliver more 'advanced practice-ready' pharmacists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信