与Hedgehog通路抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:歧化分析。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anjana Shenoy, Adithya Mysore Shivakumar, Gouri Nair, Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi, Shabeer Ali Thorakkattil, Mahmathi Karuppannan
{"title":"与Hedgehog通路抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:歧化分析。","authors":"Anjana Shenoy, Adithya Mysore Shivakumar, Gouri Nair, Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi, Shabeer Ali Thorakkattil, Mahmathi Karuppannan","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) are effectively used to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Despite the benefits, HPIs are reported to cause various gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs). The study was conducted to detect possible safety signals of HPIs concerning GIAE through disproportionality analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed in the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database using OpenVigil 2.1, a web-based pharmacovigilance tool. All the GIAEs reported due to the HPIs, like vismodegib, sonidegib, and glasdegib, were extracted and analysed. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) > 1 was considered the reporting threshold.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>The HPIs accounted for 6781 adverse events, with 1196 GIAEs distributed across vismodegib (18.56%), sonidegib (13.89%), and glasdegib (5.39%). A potential safety signal was portrayed with atrophic glossitis [ROR: 181.88 (95% CI: 72.73-454.83)] and ageusia [153.34 (141.20-166.52)] from vismodegib. The study identified concerns of dysgeusia [17.39 (11.72-25.81)] from sonidegib and hepatotoxicity [20.25 (9.02-45.46)] from glasdegib.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPIs had triggered various types of GIAEs. Liver injuries were a safety concern for the HPI-treated patient, which was not listed by the USFDA. Further researches are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with Hedgehog pathway inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anjana Shenoy, Adithya Mysore Shivakumar, Gouri Nair, Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi, Shabeer Ali Thorakkattil, Mahmathi Karuppannan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijpp/riaf090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) are effectively used to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Despite the benefits, HPIs are reported to cause various gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs). The study was conducted to detect possible safety signals of HPIs concerning GIAE through disproportionality analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed in the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database using OpenVigil 2.1, a web-based pharmacovigilance tool. All the GIAEs reported due to the HPIs, like vismodegib, sonidegib, and glasdegib, were extracted and analysed. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) > 1 was considered the reporting threshold.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>The HPIs accounted for 6781 adverse events, with 1196 GIAEs distributed across vismodegib (18.56%), sonidegib (13.89%), and glasdegib (5.39%). A potential safety signal was portrayed with atrophic glossitis [ROR: 181.88 (95% CI: 72.73-454.83)] and ageusia [153.34 (141.20-166.52)] from vismodegib. The study identified concerns of dysgeusia [17.39 (11.72-25.81)] from sonidegib and hepatotoxicity [20.25 (9.02-45.46)] from glasdegib.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPIs had triggered various types of GIAEs. Liver injuries were a safety concern for the HPI-treated patient, which was not listed by the USFDA. Further researches are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用Hedgehog途径抑制剂(hpi)有效治疗基底细胞癌(BCC)。尽管有益处,但据报道hpi会引起各种胃肠道不良事件(giae)。本研究通过歧化分析来检测与GIAE相关的hpi可能存在的安全信号。方法:使用基于网络的药物警戒工具OpenVigil 2.1,在USFDA不良事件报告系统数据库中进行回顾性病例/非病例歧化分析。所有报告的由hpi引起的giae,如vismodegib、sonidegib和glasdegib,被提取并分析。报告优势比(ROR) bb0.1被认为是报告阈值。主要发现:hpi占6781例不良事件,其中1196例giae分布在vismodegib(18.56%)、sonidegib(13.89%)和glasdegib(5.39%)。vismodegib的潜在安全信号为萎缩性舌炎[ROR: 181.88 (95% CI: 72.73-454.83)]和老年症[153.34(141.20-166.52)]。该研究确定了sonidegib引起的发音障碍[17.39(11.72-25.81)]和glasdegib引起的肝毒性[20.25(9.02-45.46)]。结论:hpi可诱发多种类型的giae。肝损伤是hpi治疗患者的一个安全问题,未被美国食品药品监督管理局列出。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with Hedgehog pathway inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis.

Objective: The Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) are effectively used to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Despite the benefits, HPIs are reported to cause various gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs). The study was conducted to detect possible safety signals of HPIs concerning GIAE through disproportionality analysis.

Methods: A retrospective case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed in the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System database using OpenVigil 2.1, a web-based pharmacovigilance tool. All the GIAEs reported due to the HPIs, like vismodegib, sonidegib, and glasdegib, were extracted and analysed. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) > 1 was considered the reporting threshold.

Key findings: The HPIs accounted for 6781 adverse events, with 1196 GIAEs distributed across vismodegib (18.56%), sonidegib (13.89%), and glasdegib (5.39%). A potential safety signal was portrayed with atrophic glossitis [ROR: 181.88 (95% CI: 72.73-454.83)] and ageusia [153.34 (141.20-166.52)] from vismodegib. The study identified concerns of dysgeusia [17.39 (11.72-25.81)] from sonidegib and hepatotoxicity [20.25 (9.02-45.46)] from glasdegib.

Conclusions: HPIs had triggered various types of GIAEs. Liver injuries were a safety concern for the HPI-treated patient, which was not listed by the USFDA. Further researches are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信