Moritz Rothe, Andreas A Boehmer, Katia Y Schneider, Pascal Spork, Lilli C Wiedenmann, Elena Nussbaum, Christoph Keim, Peter Weiss, Bianca C Dobre, Bernhard M Kaess, Joachim R Ehrlich
{"title":"质疑肺静脉隔离在多病患者中的作用:对1400多例房颤患者的前瞻性分析","authors":"Moritz Rothe, Andreas A Boehmer, Katia Y Schneider, Pascal Spork, Lilli C Wiedenmann, Elena Nussbaum, Christoph Keim, Peter Weiss, Bianca C Dobre, Bernhard M Kaess, Joachim R Ehrlich","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early rhythm control (ERC) improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a high comorbidity burden, but this benefit has been demonstrated primarily through antiarrhythmic drug therapy. It remains unclear whether catheter ablation - particularly pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) - achieves comparable efficacy in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of PVI in multimorbid AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-centre observational study of 1,402 consecutive patients undergoing first-time cryoballoon-based PVI. Patients were stratified by CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA score; a score ≥4 defined high comorbidity burden. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Secondary endpoints included procedural safety and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up of 2 years (range 6 months to 5 years), recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with high vs. low comorbidity burden at 5 years (Kaplan-Meier event rates: 64.4% vs. 53.1%; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03-1.53; P=0.01). Age ≥75 years was the only independent predictor of recurrence. Safety outcomes and procedural safety were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the established prognostic benefit of ERC in multimorbid patients, long-term rhythm control with PVI is significantly less effective in this population. These findings question routine first-line use of ablation-based strategies in patients most likely to benefit from rhythm control, highlighting the need for randomized trials comparing pharmacological and ablative ERC in high-risk AF cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the Role of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Multimorbid Patients: A Prospective Analysis in Over 1,400 AF Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Rothe, Andreas A Boehmer, Katia Y Schneider, Pascal Spork, Lilli C Wiedenmann, Elena Nussbaum, Christoph Keim, Peter Weiss, Bianca C Dobre, Bernhard M Kaess, Joachim R Ehrlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early rhythm control (ERC) improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a high comorbidity burden, but this benefit has been demonstrated primarily through antiarrhythmic drug therapy. It remains unclear whether catheter ablation - particularly pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) - achieves comparable efficacy in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of PVI in multimorbid AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-centre observational study of 1,402 consecutive patients undergoing first-time cryoballoon-based PVI. Patients were stratified by CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA score; a score ≥4 defined high comorbidity burden. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Secondary endpoints included procedural safety and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up of 2 years (range 6 months to 5 years), recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with high vs. low comorbidity burden at 5 years (Kaplan-Meier event rates: 64.4% vs. 53.1%; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03-1.53; P=0.01). Age ≥75 years was the only independent predictor of recurrence. Safety outcomes and procedural safety were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the established prognostic benefit of ERC in multimorbid patients, long-term rhythm control with PVI is significantly less effective in this population. These findings question routine first-line use of ablation-based strategies in patients most likely to benefit from rhythm control, highlighting the need for randomized trials comparing pharmacological and ablative ERC in high-risk AF cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:早期心律控制(ERC)改善心房颤动(AF)患者的心血管预后,但这种益处主要是通过抗心律失常药物治疗来证明的。导管消融-特别是肺静脉隔离(PVI) -是否在这一高危人群中达到相当的疗效尚不清楚。目的:评价PVI治疗多病房颤患者的长期疗效和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究,对1,402例连续患者进行了首次冷冻球囊为基础的PVI。采用CHA2DS2-VA评分对患者进行分层;评分≥4分为高合并症负担。主要终点是在90天的空白期后房性心律失常复发。次要终点包括手术安全性和死亡率。结果:平均随访2年(6个月至5年),5年时共病负担高的患者复发率明显高于共病负担低的患者(Kaplan-Meier事件发生率:64.4% vs. 53.1%; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03-1.53; P=0.01)。年龄≥75岁是复发的唯一独立预测因子。各组的安全结果和程序安全性相似。结论:尽管ERC在多病患者中具有预后益处,但PVI的长期节律控制在这一人群中效果明显较差。这些发现质疑了在最有可能从心律控制中获益的患者中常规一线消融策略的使用,强调了在高危房颤队列中进行比较药理学和消融ERC的随机试验的必要性。
Questioning the Role of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Multimorbid Patients: A Prospective Analysis in Over 1,400 AF Patients.
Background: Early rhythm control (ERC) improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a high comorbidity burden, but this benefit has been demonstrated primarily through antiarrhythmic drug therapy. It remains unclear whether catheter ablation - particularly pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) - achieves comparable efficacy in this high-risk population.
Objective: We aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of PVI in multimorbid AF patients.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-centre observational study of 1,402 consecutive patients undergoing first-time cryoballoon-based PVI. Patients were stratified by CHA2DS2-VA score; a score ≥4 defined high comorbidity burden. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Secondary endpoints included procedural safety and mortality.
Results: Over a mean follow-up of 2 years (range 6 months to 5 years), recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with high vs. low comorbidity burden at 5 years (Kaplan-Meier event rates: 64.4% vs. 53.1%; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03-1.53; P=0.01). Age ≥75 years was the only independent predictor of recurrence. Safety outcomes and procedural safety were similar across groups.
Conclusion: Despite the established prognostic benefit of ERC in multimorbid patients, long-term rhythm control with PVI is significantly less effective in this population. These findings question routine first-line use of ablation-based strategies in patients most likely to benefit from rhythm control, highlighting the need for randomized trials comparing pharmacological and ablative ERC in high-risk AF cohorts.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.