理解从压力到抑郁的转变:智利大都市区成人焦虑的纵向中介分析。

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668518
Gustavo Marcos-Escobar, Marcos E Gómez, Wenceslao Unanue
{"title":"理解从压力到抑郁的转变:智利大都市区成人焦虑的纵向中介分析。","authors":"Gustavo Marcos-Escobar, Marcos E Gómez, Wenceslao Unanue","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on recent advances in Beck's cognitive model-which traditionally conceptualizes anxiety and depression as correlated but does not explicitly address their temporal ordering-this study tests whether anxiety operates as a sequential mediator linking sustained stress to depressive symptoms in a non-clinical adult population. Prior longitudinal and mediation studies have examined associations among stress, anxiety, and depression, but differences in design, population, and analytical focus limit their applicability to non-clinical adult contexts. We extend this literature with data obtained from 805 adults in the Metropolitan Region of Santiago, Chile, followed across three waves at two-month intervals during the COVID-19 pandemic, although no pre-pandemic baseline was available. Accordingly, findings should be interpreted as evidence of the stress-anxiety- depression sequence within pandemic conditions. A cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) was used to estimate the temporal relations among stress, anxiety, and depression. This statistical method accounts for the stability of each construct across repeated measurements while estimating directional relationships over time. Results confirmed a significant partial mediation: perceived stress at T1 predicted higher anxiety at T2, which in turn predicted increased depressive symptoms at T3 (standardized indirect effect <i>β</i> = 0.049, 95% CI [0.016, 0.091], <i>p</i> = 0.009). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study conducted with a non-clinical adult sample from the Metropolitan Region of Chile that validates this mediation sequence. The findings advance Beck's model by demonstrating anxiety's role as a sequential mediator, contribute methodologically through the use of a three-wave CLPM to test temporal precedence, and support preventive interventions targeting early detection of subclinical anxiety to disrupt trajectories toward depression. Together, the results update the cognitive model and inform both clinical practice and public health strategies in emotionally demanding contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1668518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the transition from stress to depression: a longitudinal mediational analysis of anxiety in adults from the Metropolitan Region of Chile.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Marcos-Escobar, Marcos E Gómez, Wenceslao Unanue\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drawing on recent advances in Beck's cognitive model-which traditionally conceptualizes anxiety and depression as correlated but does not explicitly address their temporal ordering-this study tests whether anxiety operates as a sequential mediator linking sustained stress to depressive symptoms in a non-clinical adult population. Prior longitudinal and mediation studies have examined associations among stress, anxiety, and depression, but differences in design, population, and analytical focus limit their applicability to non-clinical adult contexts. We extend this literature with data obtained from 805 adults in the Metropolitan Region of Santiago, Chile, followed across three waves at two-month intervals during the COVID-19 pandemic, although no pre-pandemic baseline was available. Accordingly, findings should be interpreted as evidence of the stress-anxiety- depression sequence within pandemic conditions. A cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) was used to estimate the temporal relations among stress, anxiety, and depression. This statistical method accounts for the stability of each construct across repeated measurements while estimating directional relationships over time. Results confirmed a significant partial mediation: perceived stress at T1 predicted higher anxiety at T2, which in turn predicted increased depressive symptoms at T3 (standardized indirect effect <i>β</i> = 0.049, 95% CI [0.016, 0.091], <i>p</i> = 0.009). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study conducted with a non-clinical adult sample from the Metropolitan Region of Chile that validates this mediation sequence. The findings advance Beck's model by demonstrating anxiety's role as a sequential mediator, contribute methodologically through the use of a three-wave CLPM to test temporal precedence, and support preventive interventions targeting early detection of subclinical anxiety to disrupt trajectories toward depression. Together, the results update the cognitive model and inform both clinical practice and public health strategies in emotionally demanding contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1668518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Beck的认知模型传统上将焦虑和抑郁概念化,但并没有明确指出它们的时间顺序。利用Beck认知模型的最新进展,本研究在非临床成年人群中测试了焦虑是否作为将持续压力与抑郁症状联系起来的顺序中介。先前的纵向和中介研究已经检查了压力、焦虑和抑郁之间的关联,但设计、人群和分析焦点的差异限制了它们对非临床成人背景的适用性。我们利用从智利圣地亚哥大都市区的805名成年人中获得的数据扩展了这一文献,这些数据在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间每隔两个月进行三次随访,尽管没有大流行前的基线。因此,研究结果应被解释为大流行条件下压力-焦虑-抑郁序列的证据。使用交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM)来估计压力、焦虑和抑郁之间的时间关系。这种统计方法考虑了每个结构在重复测量中的稳定性,同时估计了随时间的方向关系。结果证实了显著的部分中介:T1时的感知压力预测T2时更高的焦虑,而焦虑反过来又预测T3时抑郁症状的增加(标准化间接效应β = 0.049,95% CI [0.016, 0.091], p = 0.009)。据我们所知,这是首次对来自智利大都市区的非临床成人样本进行的纵向研究,验证了这一中介序列。这些发现通过证明焦虑作为顺序中介的作用来推进Beck的模型,通过使用三波CLPM来测试时间优先性,并支持针对亚临床焦虑的早期检测的预防性干预,以破坏抑郁的轨迹。总之,研究结果更新了认知模型,并为临床实践和情感需求环境下的公共卫生策略提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the transition from stress to depression: a longitudinal mediational analysis of anxiety in adults from the Metropolitan Region of Chile.

Drawing on recent advances in Beck's cognitive model-which traditionally conceptualizes anxiety and depression as correlated but does not explicitly address their temporal ordering-this study tests whether anxiety operates as a sequential mediator linking sustained stress to depressive symptoms in a non-clinical adult population. Prior longitudinal and mediation studies have examined associations among stress, anxiety, and depression, but differences in design, population, and analytical focus limit their applicability to non-clinical adult contexts. We extend this literature with data obtained from 805 adults in the Metropolitan Region of Santiago, Chile, followed across three waves at two-month intervals during the COVID-19 pandemic, although no pre-pandemic baseline was available. Accordingly, findings should be interpreted as evidence of the stress-anxiety- depression sequence within pandemic conditions. A cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) was used to estimate the temporal relations among stress, anxiety, and depression. This statistical method accounts for the stability of each construct across repeated measurements while estimating directional relationships over time. Results confirmed a significant partial mediation: perceived stress at T1 predicted higher anxiety at T2, which in turn predicted increased depressive symptoms at T3 (standardized indirect effect β = 0.049, 95% CI [0.016, 0.091], p = 0.009). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study conducted with a non-clinical adult sample from the Metropolitan Region of Chile that validates this mediation sequence. The findings advance Beck's model by demonstrating anxiety's role as a sequential mediator, contribute methodologically through the use of a three-wave CLPM to test temporal precedence, and support preventive interventions targeting early detection of subclinical anxiety to disrupt trajectories toward depression. Together, the results update the cognitive model and inform both clinical practice and public health strategies in emotionally demanding contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信