急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者内皮细胞激活和应激指数(EASIX)与死亡率之间的关系:一项多中心回顾性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988
Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng
{"title":"急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者内皮细胞激活和应激指数(EASIX)与死亡率之间的关系:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1570988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1570988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内皮活化和应激指数(EASIX)计算方法为[乳酸脱氢酶(U/L) ×肌酐(mg/dL)] ÷血小板计数(109/L),是内皮功能障碍的可靠生物标志物。内皮损伤与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的病理生理机制密切相关。然而,EASIX与ARDS患者之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:为了评估EASIX与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后之间的关系,我们在两个队列中使用Cox比例风险模型和限制性三次样条方法。然后,我们将EASIX分为高Log2_EASIX组和低Log2_EASIX组,使用倾向评分匹配来匹配两个队列中两个分层组的基线数据,以减少混杂偏倚。此外,我们进一步分析了高Log2_EASIX组和低Log2_EASIX组临床结局的差异,并对匹配数据进行Kaplan-Meier分析。结果:在MIMIC-IV队列中,与生存组相比,在28天内,非生存组的Log2_EASIX更高(生存率:非生存= 1.35 [0.16,2.80]:2.08 [0.79,3.59],P = 0.002),而在CQMU队列中,非生存组的Log2_EASIX更高(生存率:非生存= 1.91[1.48,2.43])。2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001),即使在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,Log2_EASIX值升高的个体在住院期间和入院后28、60和90天仍然面临更高的死亡风险。结论:EASIX水平升高与ARDS患者较高的死亡风险呈正相关。评估EASIX水平可能是预测ARDS总生存期的一个有希望的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.

Methods: To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.

Results: In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.

Conclusion: Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信