Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng
{"title":"急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者内皮细胞激活和应激指数(EASIX)与死亡率之间的关系:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1570988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Chen, Jing Lv, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1570988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1570988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicenter retrospective study.
Background: The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), calculated as [lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)] ÷ platelet count (109/L), serves as a reliable biomarker for endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial damage significantly contributes to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the relationship between EASIX and ARDS patients remains to be fully elucidated.
Methods: To evaluate the relationship between EASIX and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in two cohorts we used Cox proportional hazards models and applied restricted cubic spline methods. Then we stratify EASIX into higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups, matched baseline data from the two stratified groups in both cohorts using propensity score matching to reduce confounding bias. Additionally, we further analyzed the differences in clinical outcomes between the higher Log2_EASIX and lower Log2_EASIX groups and performed Kaplan-Meier analysis on the matched data.
Results: In the MIMIC-IV cohort, compared to the survival group, within the 28 days, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.35 [0.16, 2.80]: 2.08 [0.79, 3.59], P = 0.002),and in the CQMU cohort, the non-survival group had higher Log2_EASIX (Survival: Non-survival = 1.91 [1.48, 2.43]: 2.34 [1.89, 3.01], P < 0.0001), Even after adjusting for potential confounders, individuals exhibiting elevated Log2_EASIX values still faced a greater risk of mortality during hospitalization and at 28-, 60-and 90-day post-admission.
Conclusion: Elevated EASIX levels were found to be positively correlated with a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. Assessing EASIX levels could be a promising biomarker for predicting overall survival in ARDS.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.