{"title":"冠状动脉介入治疗中的导管延伸:设备选择、技术见解和临床应用。","authors":"Yoshiyasu Minami, Takayuki Warisawa, Aritomo Katsura, Takuma Tsuda, Kenichi Hagiya, Koki Shishido, Takuya Hashimoto, Takashi Ashikaga","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guide extension catheters in coronary intervention: device selection, technical insights, and clinical applications.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiyasu Minami, Takayuki Warisawa, Aritomo Katsura, Takuma Tsuda, Kenichi Hagiya, Koki Shishido, Takuya Hashimoto, Takashi Ashikaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guide extension catheters in coronary intervention: device selection, technical insights, and clinical applications.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.