Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang
{"title":"利用内在心脏运动与外部机械振动:MRI电影标记和MR弹性成像用于肝纤维化评估的比较。","authors":"Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing Intrinsic Cardiac Motion vs. External Mechanical Vibrations: A Comparison of MRI Cine-Tagging and MR Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Harnessing Intrinsic Cardiac Motion vs. External Mechanical Vibrations: A Comparison of MRI Cine-Tagging and MR Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Assessment.
Objective: This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.
Methods: MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.
Results: MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).
Conclusion: MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.
Advances in knowledge: A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option