利用内在心脏运动与外部机械振动:MRI电影标记和MR弹性成像用于肝纤维化评估的比较。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang
{"title":"利用内在心脏运动与外部机械振动:MRI电影标记和MR弹性成像用于肝纤维化评估的比较。","authors":"Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing Intrinsic Cardiac Motion vs. External Mechanical Vibrations: A Comparison of MRI Cine-Tagging and MR Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry L Lefebvre, Anton Volniansky, Léonie Petitclerc, Emmanuel Montagnon, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Bich Ngoc Nguyen, Guillaume Gilbert, Guy Cloutier, An Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较MRI电影标记和磁共振弹性成像(MRE)对组织学证实的慢性肝病患者肝纤维化分期的诊断准确性。方法:MRI电影标记将肝脏应变评估为由左肝叶内在心脏运动引起的变形,而MRE捕获肝脏刚度,以响应机械驱动器的外部施加振动。对76名经活检证实的慢性肝病患者进行了MRI电影标记和MRE的头部比较。评估Spearman等级相关系数和受试者工作特征曲线下面积。采用Delong法比较auc。结果:MRE衍生的剪切模量增加,而标记的电影MRI获得的应变随着纤维化分期的增加而减少(ρ = 0.73和ρ=-0.67)。结论:MRI电影标记对肝纤维化分期的诊断性能与MRE相似,除了肝硬化的诊断(F4)。作为腹部MRI筛查的一部分,评估肝脏劳损是可能的,无需额外的设备即可提供对左叶的额外了解。知识进展:磁共振弹性成像(MRE)是肝纤维化无创分期最准确的技术,目前还没有进行与MRI电影标记的正面比较。我们发现,除了慢性肝病患者的肝硬化诊断外,MRI电影标记具有不需要任何额外硬件的优点,与MRE相比,在肝纤维化分期方面提供了类似的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing Intrinsic Cardiac Motion vs. External Mechanical Vibrations: A Comparison of MRI Cine-Tagging and MR Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Assessment.

Objective: This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI cine-tagging and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging histologically confirmed liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods: MRI cine-tagging evaluates liver strain as the deformation induced by intrinsic cardiac motion on the left liver lobe, whereas MRE captures liver stiffness in response to externally applied vibrations from a mechanical driver. A head-to-head comparison of MRI cine-tagging and MRE was performed in 76 participants with biopsy-proven chronic liver disease. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were assessed. AUCs were compared using the Delong method.

Results: MRE-derived shear modulus increased, while strain obtained from tagged cine MRI decreased with higher fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.73 and ρ=-0.67, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both shear modulus and strain values exhibited significant differences across fibrosis stages (P < 0.0001) and correlated with each other (ρ=-0.44, P < 0.0001). MRE provided higher AUCs than MRI cine-tagging only for distinguishing stages ≤F3 vs. F4 (0.91 vs. 0.87, P = 0.043). There were no significant differences in AUCs for differentiating other dichotomized fibrosis stages, including stages F0 vs. ≥F1 (0.87 vs. 0.81, P = 0.083), ≤F1 vs. ≥F2 (0.84 vs. 0.84, P = 0.889), and ≤F2 vs. ≥F3 (0.89 vs. 0.86, P = 0.116).

Conclusion: MRI cine-tagging provided a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4). It is possible to assess liver strain as part of abdominal MRI screening, offering additional insight into the left lobe without the need for additional equipment.

Advances in knowledge: A head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the most accurate technique for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis, and MRI cine-tagging has not been performed yet. We found that MRI cine-tagging, having the advantage of not requiring any additional hardware, provides a similar diagnostic performance compared to MRE for staging liver fibrosis, except for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信