几何因素决定神经元之间树突域交叉:建模研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Rafael Ignacio Gatica, Trinidad Montero, Navid Farassat, Pablo Henny
{"title":"几何因素决定神经元之间树突域交叉:建模研究。","authors":"Rafael Ignacio Gatica, Trinidad Montero, Navid Farassat, Pablo Henny","doi":"10.1007/s00429-025-03011-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modeling the structural basis of neuronal connectivity has advanced our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system. Research has focused on predicting synaptic connectivity from the geometry of intersecting axonal and dendritic trees. We extended this framework to examine how the dendritic domains of neighbouring neurons intersect, aiming to understand how shared afferences and projection system topography arise. We studied intersections in pairs of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons (n = 15; 105 pairs), as if in their actual brain locations, using intersection of their 3D convex hulls polyhedra (CHPs) as proxies of domain intersection. Proximity increased intersection probability, but substantial data spreading suggested additional factors. We hypothesized that similarities in domain volume, orientation, somatic eccentricity, and shape increase intersection too. After independently normalizing each factor based on a common value or structural principle, we found that eccentricity homogenization most strongly increased intersection and model accuracy. Combining normalization of two or more factors further enhanced both metrics, though effects were factor dependent; simultaneous normalization of eccentricity and shape produced the greatest increases. We replicated the analysis with nigral dopaminergic neurons and found eccentricity to be the strongest determinant of intersection. This result held when systematically spacing CHPs and when using α-shapes for closer representation of dendritic architecture. Interestingly, VTA CHP pairs intersected more than nigral pairs at equal distances, suggesting greater geometrical heterogeneity in the latter. These findings suggest that differences in neuronal geometry contribute to segregated connectivity in topographically arranged neural circuits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":"230 8","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometrical factors determining dendritic domain intersection between neurons: a modeling study.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Ignacio Gatica, Trinidad Montero, Navid Farassat, Pablo Henny\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00429-025-03011-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modeling the structural basis of neuronal connectivity has advanced our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system. Research has focused on predicting synaptic connectivity from the geometry of intersecting axonal and dendritic trees. We extended this framework to examine how the dendritic domains of neighbouring neurons intersect, aiming to understand how shared afferences and projection system topography arise. We studied intersections in pairs of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons (n = 15; 105 pairs), as if in their actual brain locations, using intersection of their 3D convex hulls polyhedra (CHPs) as proxies of domain intersection. Proximity increased intersection probability, but substantial data spreading suggested additional factors. We hypothesized that similarities in domain volume, orientation, somatic eccentricity, and shape increase intersection too. After independently normalizing each factor based on a common value or structural principle, we found that eccentricity homogenization most strongly increased intersection and model accuracy. Combining normalization of two or more factors further enhanced both metrics, though effects were factor dependent; simultaneous normalization of eccentricity and shape produced the greatest increases. We replicated the analysis with nigral dopaminergic neurons and found eccentricity to be the strongest determinant of intersection. This result held when systematically spacing CHPs and when using α-shapes for closer representation of dendritic architecture. Interestingly, VTA CHP pairs intersected more than nigral pairs at equal distances, suggesting greater geometrical heterogeneity in the latter. These findings suggest that differences in neuronal geometry contribute to segregated connectivity in topographically arranged neural circuits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"volume\":\"230 8\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-025-03011-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-025-03011-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经元连接的结构基础建模提高了我们对神经系统组织和功能的理解。研究的重点是从相交的轴突树和树突树的几何形状来预测突触的连通性。我们扩展了这个框架来研究相邻神经元的树突域是如何相交的,旨在了解共享的传入和投射系统地形是如何产生的。我们研究了腹侧被盖区(VTA)多巴胺能神经元对(n = 15; 105对)的交叉点,就像在它们的实际大脑位置一样,使用它们的3D凸壳多面体(CHPs)的交叉点作为域交叉点的代理。接近增加了交叉概率,但大量数据的传播表明了其他因素。我们假设区域体积、方向、体偏心率和形状的相似性也增加了交集。在基于共同值或结构原理对每个因子进行独立归一化后,我们发现偏心均质化最显著地提高了相交和模型精度。结合两个或多个因素的标准化进一步增强了这两个指标,尽管效果是依赖于因素的;偏心距和形状同时归一化产生了最大的增加。我们对黑质多巴胺能神经元进行了重复分析,发现偏心率是交叉的最强决定因素。当系统地间隔CHPs和使用α-形状来更接近地表示树突结构时,这一结果成立。有趣的是,VTA热电偶在相同距离上比普通热电偶相交更多,这表明后者的几何异质性更大。这些发现表明,神经元几何结构的差异导致了神经回路的分离连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geometrical factors determining dendritic domain intersection between neurons: a modeling study.

Modeling the structural basis of neuronal connectivity has advanced our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system. Research has focused on predicting synaptic connectivity from the geometry of intersecting axonal and dendritic trees. We extended this framework to examine how the dendritic domains of neighbouring neurons intersect, aiming to understand how shared afferences and projection system topography arise. We studied intersections in pairs of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons (n = 15; 105 pairs), as if in their actual brain locations, using intersection of their 3D convex hulls polyhedra (CHPs) as proxies of domain intersection. Proximity increased intersection probability, but substantial data spreading suggested additional factors. We hypothesized that similarities in domain volume, orientation, somatic eccentricity, and shape increase intersection too. After independently normalizing each factor based on a common value or structural principle, we found that eccentricity homogenization most strongly increased intersection and model accuracy. Combining normalization of two or more factors further enhanced both metrics, though effects were factor dependent; simultaneous normalization of eccentricity and shape produced the greatest increases. We replicated the analysis with nigral dopaminergic neurons and found eccentricity to be the strongest determinant of intersection. This result held when systematically spacing CHPs and when using α-shapes for closer representation of dendritic architecture. Interestingly, VTA CHP pairs intersected more than nigral pairs at equal distances, suggesting greater geometrical heterogeneity in the latter. These findings suggest that differences in neuronal geometry contribute to segregated connectivity in topographically arranged neural circuits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信