转移性前列腺癌患者主流基因检测途径的体会。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Michiel Vlaming, Eveline M A Bleiker, Gina Schijven, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Harm H E van Melick, Jarmo C B Hunting, M Arjen Noordzij, Aart Beeker, Diederik M Somford, Henk G van der Poel, Carl J Wijburg, Bart P Wijsman, Robert J Hoekstra, R Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Bart P J van Bezooijen, Richard P Meijer, Martijn B Busstra, H Pieter van den Berg, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Benjamin H J Doornweerd, Inge M van Oort, Margreet G E M Ausems
{"title":"转移性前列腺癌患者主流基因检测途径的体会。","authors":"Michiel Vlaming, Eveline M A Bleiker, Gina Schijven, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Harm H E van Melick, Jarmo C B Hunting, M Arjen Noordzij, Aart Beeker, Diederik M Somford, Henk G van der Poel, Carl J Wijburg, Bart P Wijsman, Robert J Hoekstra, R Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Bart P J van Bezooijen, Richard P Meijer, Martijn B Busstra, H Pieter van den Berg, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Benjamin H J Doornweerd, Inge M van Oort, Margreet G E M Ausems","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are eligible for germline genetic testing. This study assessed the experiences of mPCa patients undergoing genetic testing after being counselled by non-genetic healthcare professionals (ngHCPs: urologists, oncologists, nurses). We assessed the psychosocial impact, decision-making difficulties and knowledge of genetics. In a prospective cohort study across 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, genetic testing was discussed and requested by ngHCPs. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after receiving pre-test genetic counselling and 4 weeks and 6 months after receiving their genetic test results. Anxiety, depression, distress, decisional conflict regarding genetic testing, decision regret and knowledge of genetics were assessed. Of 767 patients who received germline genetic testing, 5% to 8% experienced clinically significant anxiety or depression at some point in time. Although up to 49% of participants had significantly elevated distress scores as assessed with the Distress Thermometer, more than 90% stated that the testing process did not affect their feelings of distress. Patients with high educational levels had more favourable outcomes than patients with low educational levels on distress and decisional conflict (odds ratios 0.36 [0.23-0.57] and 0.44 [0.21-0.93], respectively). Furthermore, only 50% of the knowledge questions about genetics were answered correctly. To conclude, germline genetic testing within a mainstreaming pathway does not lead to increased levels of general anxiety or depression in most mPCa patients. However, the poorer outcomes on several psychosocial measures for patients with low educational levels are a point of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of metastatic prostate cancer patients with a mainstream genetic testing pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Michiel Vlaming, Eveline M A Bleiker, Gina Schijven, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Harm H E van Melick, Jarmo C B Hunting, M Arjen Noordzij, Aart Beeker, Diederik M Somford, Henk G van der Poel, Carl J Wijburg, Bart P Wijsman, Robert J Hoekstra, R Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Bart P J van Bezooijen, Richard P Meijer, Martijn B Busstra, H Pieter van den Berg, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Benjamin H J Doornweerd, Inge M van Oort, Margreet G E M Ausems\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are eligible for germline genetic testing. This study assessed the experiences of mPCa patients undergoing genetic testing after being counselled by non-genetic healthcare professionals (ngHCPs: urologists, oncologists, nurses). We assessed the psychosocial impact, decision-making difficulties and knowledge of genetics. In a prospective cohort study across 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, genetic testing was discussed and requested by ngHCPs. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after receiving pre-test genetic counselling and 4 weeks and 6 months after receiving their genetic test results. Anxiety, depression, distress, decisional conflict regarding genetic testing, decision regret and knowledge of genetics were assessed. Of 767 patients who received germline genetic testing, 5% to 8% experienced clinically significant anxiety or depression at some point in time. Although up to 49% of participants had significantly elevated distress scores as assessed with the Distress Thermometer, more than 90% stated that the testing process did not affect their feelings of distress. Patients with high educational levels had more favourable outcomes than patients with low educational levels on distress and decisional conflict (odds ratios 0.36 [0.23-0.57] and 0.44 [0.21-0.93], respectively). Furthermore, only 50% of the knowledge questions about genetics were answered correctly. To conclude, germline genetic testing within a mainstreaming pathway does not lead to increased levels of general anxiety or depression in most mPCa patients. However, the poorer outcomes on several psychosocial measures for patients with low educational levels are a point of concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70194\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)患者有资格进行种系基因检测。本研究评估了mPCa患者在接受非遗传保健专业人员(nghcp:泌尿科医生、肿瘤科医生、护士)的建议后进行基因检测的经验。我们评估了心理社会影响、决策困难和遗传学知识。在一项横跨荷兰15家医院的前瞻性队列研究中,nghcp讨论并要求进行基因检测。患者在接受检测前遗传咨询后不久,在收到基因检测结果后4周和6个月完成问卷调查。评估焦虑、抑郁、痛苦、基因检测决策冲突、决策后悔和遗传学知识。在接受生殖系基因检测的767名患者中,5%至8%的患者在某个时间点经历了临床显著的焦虑或抑郁。尽管高达49%的参与者在使用“痛苦温度计”评估时的痛苦得分显著提高,但超过90%的人表示,测试过程并没有影响他们的痛苦感受。受教育程度高的患者在焦虑和决策冲突方面的预后优于受教育程度低的患者(优势比分别为0.36[0.23-0.57]和0.44[0.21-0.93])。此外,只有50%的遗传学知识问题回答正确。总之,主流途径内的种系基因检测不会导致大多数mPCa患者普遍焦虑或抑郁水平的增加。然而,教育水平低的患者在一些社会心理测量上的较差结果是一个值得关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of metastatic prostate cancer patients with a mainstream genetic testing pathway.

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are eligible for germline genetic testing. This study assessed the experiences of mPCa patients undergoing genetic testing after being counselled by non-genetic healthcare professionals (ngHCPs: urologists, oncologists, nurses). We assessed the psychosocial impact, decision-making difficulties and knowledge of genetics. In a prospective cohort study across 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, genetic testing was discussed and requested by ngHCPs. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after receiving pre-test genetic counselling and 4 weeks and 6 months after receiving their genetic test results. Anxiety, depression, distress, decisional conflict regarding genetic testing, decision regret and knowledge of genetics were assessed. Of 767 patients who received germline genetic testing, 5% to 8% experienced clinically significant anxiety or depression at some point in time. Although up to 49% of participants had significantly elevated distress scores as assessed with the Distress Thermometer, more than 90% stated that the testing process did not affect their feelings of distress. Patients with high educational levels had more favourable outcomes than patients with low educational levels on distress and decisional conflict (odds ratios 0.36 [0.23-0.57] and 0.44 [0.21-0.93], respectively). Furthermore, only 50% of the knowledge questions about genetics were answered correctly. To conclude, germline genetic testing within a mainstreaming pathway does not lead to increased levels of general anxiety or depression in most mPCa patients. However, the poorer outcomes on several psychosocial measures for patients with low educational levels are a point of concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信