{"title":"人工智能能遏制“漂绿”吗?基于大型语言模型的公司级证据","authors":"Ling-Yun He , Liang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 108954"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can artificial intelligence curb greenwashing? Firm-level evidence based on large language model\",\"authors\":\"Ling-Yun He , Liang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can artificial intelligence curb greenwashing? Firm-level evidence based on large language model
Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.