人工智能能遏制“漂绿”吗?基于大型语言模型的公司级证据

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ling-Yun He , Liang Wang
{"title":"人工智能能遏制“漂绿”吗?基于大型语言模型的公司级证据","authors":"Ling-Yun He ,&nbsp;Liang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 108954"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can artificial intelligence curb greenwashing? Firm-level evidence based on large language model\",\"authors\":\"Ling-Yun He ,&nbsp;Liang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着对企业环境信息披露的审查越来越严格,人们对普遍存在的“漂绿”现象的担忧日益加剧。尽管人工智能(AI)的快速发展因其在公司治理方面的变革潜力而引起了越来越多的关注,但其对环境信息披露的影响才刚刚开始受到学术关注,值得进一步研究。本文利用2011 - 2022年中国a股上市公司面板数据,研究了人工智能的采用对企业洗绿的影响。利用源自微调大型语言模型(LLM)的新型人工智能采用指数,我们进行了实证测试,以评估人工智能使用与公司“漂绿”策略之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,人工智能的采用显著降低了“漂绿”的发生率,这在多次验证检查中仍然是稳健的。不同技术类别的分解分析表明,规划和决策系统构成了人工智能在遏制“漂绿”方面最具影响力的部分。机制分析表明,这种效应通过提高运营效率、改善人力资本结构和促进绿色创新来实现。另外,跨子样本的异质性分析表明,非国有企业、污染部门和技术密集型企业的威慑影响表现出更大的强度。通过强调人工智能在促进可信环境信息披露方面的治理潜力,本研究为数字化转型与企业可持续性的交叉提供了新的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can artificial intelligence curb greenwashing? Firm-level evidence based on large language model
Amid growing scrutiny of corporate environmental disclosures, concerns have intensified regarding the prevalence of greenwashing. Although the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn increasing attention for its transformative potential in corporate governance, its implications for environmental disclosure have only begun to receive scholarly attention and warrant further investigation. This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence adoption on corporate greenwashing using a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Leveraging a novel AI adoption index derived from a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), we conduct empirical tests to assess the relationship between AI use and firms’ greenwashing strategies. Our findings reveal that AI adoption significantly reduces the incidence of greenwashing, which remains robust across multiple validation checks. Decomposition analysis across different technological categories shows that planning and decision systems constitute the most influential strand of AI in curbing greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect operates through enhanced operational efficiency, improved human capital structure, and increased green innovation. Additional heterogeneity analysis across subsamples reveals that the deterrent impact exhibits greater intensity in firms characterized by non-state-owned firms, polluting sectors, and technology-intensive enterprises. By highlighting the governance potential of AI in promoting credible environmental disclosure, this study provides new empirical evidence on the intersection of digital transformation and corporate sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信