H.K. Perlow , Y. Sun , E. Dawson , K. Dibs , A. Ritter , D. Boulter , A. Nalin , R. Singh , S. Beyer , S. Zhu , D.M. Blakaj , J.C. Grecula , R. Raval , S. Vazquez , S. Whitman , C. Presley , C. Pillainayagam , P. Giglio , E.M. Thomas , J.D. Palmer
{"title":"接受放射治疗的脑转移患者认知能力下降的基线和时间依赖预测因素——对雅典娜试验的二次分析","authors":"H.K. Perlow , Y. Sun , E. Dawson , K. Dibs , A. Ritter , D. Boulter , A. Nalin , R. Singh , S. Beyer , S. Zhu , D.M. Blakaj , J.C. Grecula , R. Raval , S. Vazquez , S. Whitman , C. Presley , C. Pillainayagam , P. Giglio , E.M. Thomas , J.D. Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>The extent to which radiotherapy contributes to cognitive decline, versus baseline characteristics and subsequent events such as systemic therapy administration, intracranial progression, and systemic progression, is unclear. This secondary analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT05503251) aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline and time-dependent clinical and treatment characteristics on cognitive decline.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>This is a planned secondary analysis of a clinical trial in which patients with brain metastases were randomized 1:1 to either brain radiation alone or brain radiation with neuropsychology evaluation and intervention. Previous endpoint analyses showed no difference in cognitive decline between control and intervention arm. The following baseline characteristics were collected: type of radiation (stereotactic radiosurgery versus IMRT WBRT), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), sex, education level, primary tumor histology, age, brain metastases at time of cancer diagnosis, extracranial disease control, extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, brain tumor volume, previous brain radiation, receipt of any systemic therapy, and receipt of chemotherapy. Receipt of systemic therapy after trial enrollment, intracranial disease status, systemic disease status, and survival were evaluated for at least 12 months after trial enrollment. Cognition was measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Trail Making Test A/B. Cognitive decline defined as a decline on at least one assessment using the reliable change index. Analyses were performed using Gray’s test and Fine-Gray regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between August 2022 and June 2024, 110 patients were enrolled on the ATHENA Trial and eligible for analysis. On univariable analysis (UVA), only KPS >70 vs. ≤ 70 (p = 0.044) was predictive of cognitive preservation. Increased brain tumor volume (p=0.044), intracranial progression (p=0.034), and systemic progression (p = 0.005) were predictive of cognitive decline. On multivariable analysis of the four significant variables on UVA, KPS > 70 retained an association with cognitive preservation (p=0.011) and systemic progression retained an association with cognitive decline (p=0.026).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For brain metastases patients treated with radiotherapy, baseline performance status and systemic progression may be more predictive of cognitive decline than traditional implicating factors such as type of radiation, age, number of brain metastases, or systemic therapy administration. Cognitive intervention strategies for any patient with poor performance status or progressing systemic disease may be warranted. These findings will be further investigated with multi-institutional ATHENA Consortium data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"123 4","pages":"Pages 1202-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline and Time-Dependent Predictors of Cognitive Decline for Brain Metastasis Patients Treated with Radiotherapy– A Secondary Analysis of the ATHENA Trial\",\"authors\":\"H.K. Perlow , Y. Sun , E. Dawson , K. Dibs , A. Ritter , D. Boulter , A. Nalin , R. Singh , S. Beyer , S. Zhu , D.M. Blakaj , J.C. Grecula , R. Raval , S. Vazquez , S. Whitman , C. Presley , C. Pillainayagam , P. Giglio , E.M. Thomas , J.D. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>The extent to which radiotherapy contributes to cognitive decline, versus baseline characteristics and subsequent events such as systemic therapy administration, intracranial progression, and systemic progression, is unclear. This secondary analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT05503251) aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline and time-dependent clinical and treatment characteristics on cognitive decline.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>This is a planned secondary analysis of a clinical trial in which patients with brain metastases were randomized 1:1 to either brain radiation alone or brain radiation with neuropsychology evaluation and intervention. Previous endpoint analyses showed no difference in cognitive decline between control and intervention arm. The following baseline characteristics were collected: type of radiation (stereotactic radiosurgery versus IMRT WBRT), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), sex, education level, primary tumor histology, age, brain metastases at time of cancer diagnosis, extracranial disease control, extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, brain tumor volume, previous brain radiation, receipt of any systemic therapy, and receipt of chemotherapy. Receipt of systemic therapy after trial enrollment, intracranial disease status, systemic disease status, and survival were evaluated for at least 12 months after trial enrollment. Cognition was measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Trail Making Test A/B. Cognitive decline defined as a decline on at least one assessment using the reliable change index. Analyses were performed using Gray’s test and Fine-Gray regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between August 2022 and June 2024, 110 patients were enrolled on the ATHENA Trial and eligible for analysis. On univariable analysis (UVA), only KPS >70 vs. ≤ 70 (p = 0.044) was predictive of cognitive preservation. Increased brain tumor volume (p=0.044), intracranial progression (p=0.034), and systemic progression (p = 0.005) were predictive of cognitive decline. On multivariable analysis of the four significant variables on UVA, KPS > 70 retained an association with cognitive preservation (p=0.011) and systemic progression retained an association with cognitive decline (p=0.026).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For brain metastases patients treated with radiotherapy, baseline performance status and systemic progression may be more predictive of cognitive decline than traditional implicating factors such as type of radiation, age, number of brain metastases, or systemic therapy administration. Cognitive intervention strategies for any patient with poor performance status or progressing systemic disease may be warranted. These findings will be further investigated with multi-institutional ATHENA Consortium data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\"123 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1202-1203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625061723\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625061723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Baseline and Time-Dependent Predictors of Cognitive Decline for Brain Metastasis Patients Treated with Radiotherapy– A Secondary Analysis of the ATHENA Trial
Purpose/Objective(s)
The extent to which radiotherapy contributes to cognitive decline, versus baseline characteristics and subsequent events such as systemic therapy administration, intracranial progression, and systemic progression, is unclear. This secondary analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT05503251) aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline and time-dependent clinical and treatment characteristics on cognitive decline.
Materials/Methods
This is a planned secondary analysis of a clinical trial in which patients with brain metastases were randomized 1:1 to either brain radiation alone or brain radiation with neuropsychology evaluation and intervention. Previous endpoint analyses showed no difference in cognitive decline between control and intervention arm. The following baseline characteristics were collected: type of radiation (stereotactic radiosurgery versus IMRT WBRT), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), sex, education level, primary tumor histology, age, brain metastases at time of cancer diagnosis, extracranial disease control, extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, brain tumor volume, previous brain radiation, receipt of any systemic therapy, and receipt of chemotherapy. Receipt of systemic therapy after trial enrollment, intracranial disease status, systemic disease status, and survival were evaluated for at least 12 months after trial enrollment. Cognition was measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Trail Making Test A/B. Cognitive decline defined as a decline on at least one assessment using the reliable change index. Analyses were performed using Gray’s test and Fine-Gray regression model.
Results
Between August 2022 and June 2024, 110 patients were enrolled on the ATHENA Trial and eligible for analysis. On univariable analysis (UVA), only KPS >70 vs. ≤ 70 (p = 0.044) was predictive of cognitive preservation. Increased brain tumor volume (p=0.044), intracranial progression (p=0.034), and systemic progression (p = 0.005) were predictive of cognitive decline. On multivariable analysis of the four significant variables on UVA, KPS > 70 retained an association with cognitive preservation (p=0.011) and systemic progression retained an association with cognitive decline (p=0.026).
Conclusion
For brain metastases patients treated with radiotherapy, baseline performance status and systemic progression may be more predictive of cognitive decline than traditional implicating factors such as type of radiation, age, number of brain metastases, or systemic therapy administration. Cognitive intervention strategies for any patient with poor performance status or progressing systemic disease may be warranted. These findings will be further investigated with multi-institutional ATHENA Consortium data.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.