在COVID-19大流行期间,使用标准标准与修改标准诊断为妊娠糖尿病的妇女的产后糖尿病筛查和转换率

IF 2.6
Sonia Butalia, Olesya Barrett, Anamaria Savu, Vichy Liyanage, Peter Senior, Roseanne O Yeung, Padma Kaul
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行期间,使用标准标准与修改标准诊断为妊娠糖尿病的妇女的产后糖尿病筛查和转换率","authors":"Sonia Butalia, Olesya Barrett, Anamaria Savu, Vichy Liyanage, Peter Senior, Roseanne O Yeung, Padma Kaul","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine postpartum diabetes screening and rates in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using standard versus modified criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with GDM pregnancies between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, in Alberta, Canada, were stratified by the GDM diagnosis criteria used and followed for 18-months postpartum diabetes screening. Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes were compared between the standard versus modified GDM criteria groups at 6 and 18 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine differences in prediabetes and diabetes rates between the two GDM criteria groups after adjusting for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,238 individuals with GDM, 780 were diagnosed using the modified criteria and 9,458 using the standard criteria. There was no difference in the proportion of individuals who underwent postpartum screening by 6-months (27.1% versus 28.9%, p=0.29) or by 18-months (43.1% versus 45.3%, p=0.24), among modified and standard groups, respectively. Diabetes proportions were higher in women diagnosed with GDM using the modified criteria than in those diagnosed using the standard criteria (27.0% versus 4.2%, p<0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 8.18, 95% confidence interval 5.76-11.6). Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes at 18-months were 15.2% and 20.8% (p=0.014), and 29.8% and 6.1% (p<0.0001), among modified and standard groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the GDM diagnostic method, postpartum diabetes screening among women with GDM was suboptimal during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified criteria for GDM identified a group of women who were at higher risk for conversion to diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93918,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postpartum Diabetes Screening and Conversion Rates Among Women Diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Standard versus Modified Criteria During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Butalia, Olesya Barrett, Anamaria Savu, Vichy Liyanage, Peter Senior, Roseanne O Yeung, Padma Kaul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine postpartum diabetes screening and rates in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using standard versus modified criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with GDM pregnancies between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, in Alberta, Canada, were stratified by the GDM diagnosis criteria used and followed for 18-months postpartum diabetes screening. Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes were compared between the standard versus modified GDM criteria groups at 6 and 18 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine differences in prediabetes and diabetes rates between the two GDM criteria groups after adjusting for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,238 individuals with GDM, 780 were diagnosed using the modified criteria and 9,458 using the standard criteria. There was no difference in the proportion of individuals who underwent postpartum screening by 6-months (27.1% versus 28.9%, p=0.29) or by 18-months (43.1% versus 45.3%, p=0.24), among modified and standard groups, respectively. Diabetes proportions were higher in women diagnosed with GDM using the modified criteria than in those diagnosed using the standard criteria (27.0% versus 4.2%, p<0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 8.18, 95% confidence interval 5.76-11.6). Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes at 18-months were 15.2% and 20.8% (p=0.014), and 29.8% and 6.1% (p<0.0001), among modified and standard groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the GDM diagnostic method, postpartum diabetes screening among women with GDM was suboptimal during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified criteria for GDM identified a group of women who were at higher risk for conversion to diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在COVID-19大流行期间,使用标准标准和修改标准检查诊断为妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的妇女产后糖尿病筛查和发病率。方法:根据使用的GDM诊断标准对加拿大阿尔伯塔省2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间妊娠的GDM孕妇进行分层,并随访18个月的产后糖尿病筛查。在6个月和18个月时比较标准组和修改GDM标准组的前驱糖尿病和糖尿病的比例。在调整基线差异后,使用多变量logistic回归分析来检查两个GDM标准组之间糖尿病前期和糖尿病发病率的差异。结果:10238例GDM患者中,780例采用修改后的诊断标准,9458例采用标准诊断标准。改良组和标准组在产后6个月(27.1%对28.9%,p=0.29)或18个月(43.1%对45.3%,p=0.24)进行筛查的个体比例没有差异。使用修改后的标准诊断为GDM的女性患糖尿病的比例高于使用标准标准诊断为GDM的女性(27.0%对4.2%)。结论:无论采用何种GDM诊断方法,在COVID-19大流行期间,GDM女性的产后糖尿病筛查并不理想。修改后的GDM标准确定了一组转化为糖尿病的风险较高的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postpartum Diabetes Screening and Conversion Rates Among Women Diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Standard versus Modified Criteria During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Aims: To examine postpartum diabetes screening and rates in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using standard versus modified criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Individuals with GDM pregnancies between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, in Alberta, Canada, were stratified by the GDM diagnosis criteria used and followed for 18-months postpartum diabetes screening. Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes were compared between the standard versus modified GDM criteria groups at 6 and 18 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine differences in prediabetes and diabetes rates between the two GDM criteria groups after adjusting for baseline differences.

Results: Among 10,238 individuals with GDM, 780 were diagnosed using the modified criteria and 9,458 using the standard criteria. There was no difference in the proportion of individuals who underwent postpartum screening by 6-months (27.1% versus 28.9%, p=0.29) or by 18-months (43.1% versus 45.3%, p=0.24), among modified and standard groups, respectively. Diabetes proportions were higher in women diagnosed with GDM using the modified criteria than in those diagnosed using the standard criteria (27.0% versus 4.2%, p<0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 8.18, 95% confidence interval 5.76-11.6). Proportions of prediabetes and diabetes at 18-months were 15.2% and 20.8% (p=0.014), and 29.8% and 6.1% (p<0.0001), among modified and standard groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Regardless of the GDM diagnostic method, postpartum diabetes screening among women with GDM was suboptimal during the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified criteria for GDM identified a group of women who were at higher risk for conversion to diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信