护理学生与教育学生对待智障的态度比较。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Jairo Rodríguez-Medina, Clara González-Sanguino, Paula San Martín González, Carlota Alcover Van de Walle
{"title":"护理学生与教育学生对待智障的态度比较。","authors":"Jairo Rodríguez-Medina,&nbsp;Clara González-Sanguino,&nbsp;Paula San Martín González,&nbsp;Carlota Alcover Van de Walle","doi":"10.1111/jar.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Attitudes of health and education professionals towards individuals with disabilities critically influence service quality and inclusion. Few studies have compared these attitudes during professional training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 425 Spanish university students (48.6% nursing; 51.4% education; 76.5% female; <i>M</i>_age = 20.33), using the Attitudes Towards Persons With Disabilities Scale (EAPD) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the EAPD's three-factor structure; measurement invariance and latent mean comparisons were analysed using structural equation modelling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>EAPD demonstrated good psychometric properties and invariance across groups. Education students reported significantly more positive attitudes than nursing students on social relations (<i>d</i> ≈0.40), normalisation (<i>d</i> ≈0.41) and intervention programmes (<i>d</i> ≈0.51). Female gender, prior contact and progressive ideology were also associated with more positive attitudes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight attitudinal differences by field of study and underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, particularly, in healthcare programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability: A Comparison Between Nursing and Education Students\",\"authors\":\"Jairo Rodríguez-Medina,&nbsp;Clara González-Sanguino,&nbsp;Paula San Martín González,&nbsp;Carlota Alcover Van de Walle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Attitudes of health and education professionals towards individuals with disabilities critically influence service quality and inclusion. Few studies have compared these attitudes during professional training.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 425 Spanish university students (48.6% nursing; 51.4% education; 76.5% female; <i>M</i>_age = 20.33), using the Attitudes Towards Persons With Disabilities Scale (EAPD) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the EAPD's three-factor structure; measurement invariance and latent mean comparisons were analysed using structural equation modelling.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>EAPD demonstrated good psychometric properties and invariance across groups. Education students reported significantly more positive attitudes than nursing students on social relations (<i>d</i> ≈0.40), normalisation (<i>d</i> ≈0.41) and intervention programmes (<i>d</i> ≈0.51). Female gender, prior contact and progressive ideology were also associated with more positive attitudes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings highlight attitudinal differences by field of study and underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, particularly, in healthcare programmes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70137\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生和教育专业人员对残疾人的态度严重影响服务质量和包容性。很少有研究将这些态度在专业培训中进行比较。方法:采用残疾人态度量表(EAPD)和社会人口学问卷对425名西班牙大学生(护理占48.6%,教育占51.4%,女性占76.5%,M_age = 20.33)进行横断面研究。验证性因子分析检验了EAPD的三因素结构;采用结构方程模型分析测量不变性和潜在均值比较。结果:EAPD表现出良好的心理测量特性和组间不变性。教育专业学生在社会关系(d≈0.40)、正常化(d≈0.41)和干预方案(d≈0.51)方面的积极态度显著高于护理专业学生。女性性别、先前接触和进步的意识形态也与更积极的态度有关。结论:研究结果强调了不同研究领域的态度差异,并强调了有针对性的教育干预的必要性,特别是在医疗保健计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability: A Comparison Between Nursing and Education Students

Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability: A Comparison Between Nursing and Education Students

Background

Attitudes of health and education professionals towards individuals with disabilities critically influence service quality and inclusion. Few studies have compared these attitudes during professional training.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 425 Spanish university students (48.6% nursing; 51.4% education; 76.5% female; M_age = 20.33), using the Attitudes Towards Persons With Disabilities Scale (EAPD) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the EAPD's three-factor structure; measurement invariance and latent mean comparisons were analysed using structural equation modelling.

Results

EAPD demonstrated good psychometric properties and invariance across groups. Education students reported significantly more positive attitudes than nursing students on social relations (d ≈0.40), normalisation (d ≈0.41) and intervention programmes (d ≈0.51). Female gender, prior contact and progressive ideology were also associated with more positive attitudes.

Conclusions

Findings highlight attitudinal differences by field of study and underscore the need for targeted educational interventions, particularly, in healthcare programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信