考虑不同面部模式的白人患者的腭骨厚度测量:侧位头像和锥束计算机断层扫描图像之间一致性的回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
M Palone, A Beccari, G B Maino, G Bertozzi, F Cremonini, L Lombardo
{"title":"考虑不同面部模式的白人患者的腭骨厚度测量:侧位头像和锥束计算机断层扫描图像之间一致性的回顾性研究。","authors":"M Palone, A Beccari, G B Maino, G Bertozzi, F Cremonini, L Lombardo","doi":"10.1007/s00056-025-00621-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the agreement between palatal bone thickness (PBT) measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in a group of white patients considering different facial patterns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and CBCT images from 60 white patients (39 females and 21 males; 24.1 ± 6.4 years) were retrospectively compared. On lateral cephalograms, PBT values were measured by drawing lines perpendicular to the maxillary occlusal plane (MOP) at the point of contact between the first and second premolar (P1-P2), second premolar and first molar (P2-M1), and first and second molar (M1-M2), as well as at the buccal cusps of the second premolar (P2) and first molar (M1). On CBCT images, they were measured at the same landmarks at 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm off-centre to the midpalatal suture. Vertical facial pattern of the patients was determined using the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests were used to ascertain the degree of agreement between the two measurement sets (p < 0.05), subsequently quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Good agreement was found at all investigated sites regardless of vertical facial pattern, except at sites P1-P2 and P2 (8 mm off-centre) and M1 and M1-M2 (2 mm off-centre; p < 0.05). The two measurement sets displayed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.8) at P1-P2 (4 mm off-centre), at P2 (2, 4 and 6 mm off-centre), and all P2-M1 sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral cephalogram can be a viable option for digital planning of palatal miniscrews insertion, with the preferred sites being P1-P2 at 4 mm off-centre and P2 at 4 and 6 mm off-centre in selected cases for adolescents and young adults. No significant differences in the degree of agreement between the two sets of PBT measurements were found among the different vertical facial patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palatal bone thickness measurement in white patients considering different facial patterns : A retrospective study of agreement between lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images.\",\"authors\":\"M Palone, A Beccari, G B Maino, G Bertozzi, F Cremonini, L Lombardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00056-025-00621-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the agreement between palatal bone thickness (PBT) measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in a group of white patients considering different facial patterns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and CBCT images from 60 white patients (39 females and 21 males; 24.1 ± 6.4 years) were retrospectively compared. On lateral cephalograms, PBT values were measured by drawing lines perpendicular to the maxillary occlusal plane (MOP) at the point of contact between the first and second premolar (P1-P2), second premolar and first molar (P2-M1), and first and second molar (M1-M2), as well as at the buccal cusps of the second premolar (P2) and first molar (M1). On CBCT images, they were measured at the same landmarks at 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm off-centre to the midpalatal suture. Vertical facial pattern of the patients was determined using the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests were used to ascertain the degree of agreement between the two measurement sets (p < 0.05), subsequently quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Good agreement was found at all investigated sites regardless of vertical facial pattern, except at sites P1-P2 and P2 (8 mm off-centre) and M1 and M1-M2 (2 mm off-centre; p < 0.05). The two measurement sets displayed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.8) at P1-P2 (4 mm off-centre), at P2 (2, 4 and 6 mm off-centre), and all P2-M1 sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral cephalogram can be a viable option for digital planning of palatal miniscrews insertion, with the preferred sites being P1-P2 at 4 mm off-centre and P2 at 4 and 6 mm off-centre in selected cases for adolescents and young adults. No significant differences in the degree of agreement between the two sets of PBT measurements were found among the different vertical facial patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-025-00621-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-025-00621-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同面部特征的白人患者侧位头像腭骨厚度(PBT)与锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像之间的一致性。材料和方法:回顾性比较60例白人患者(女性39例,男性21例;24.1 ±6.4岁)侧位脑电图和CBCT图像的测量结果。在侧位头像上,在第一和第二前臼齿(P1-P2)、第二前臼齿和第一臼齿(P2-M1)、第一和第二臼齿(M1- m2)的接触点以及第二前臼齿(P2)和第一臼齿(M1)的颊尖处绘制垂直于上颌咬合平面(MOP)的线来测量PBT值。在CBCT图像上,它们在离中腭缝合线中心2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm和8 mm的相同地标处测量。采用法兰克福-下颌平面角(FMA)测定患者的垂直面相。方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验用于确定两个测量集之间的一致性程度(p )结果:除了P1-P2和P2位点(8 mm偏离中心)和M1和M1- m2位点(2 mm偏离中心;p 0.8),P1-P2位点(4 mm偏离中心),P2位点(2、4和6 mm偏离中心)和所有P2-M1位点外,所有被调查的位点都发现了良好的一致性。结论:侧位头颅造影是数字规划腭部微型螺钉置入的可行选择,在青少年和青壮年的特定病例中,首选位置为P1-P2离中心4 mm, P2离中心4和6 mm。在两组PBT测量之间的一致性程度没有显著差异,发现在不同的垂直面部模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palatal bone thickness measurement in white patients considering different facial patterns : A retrospective study of agreement between lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images.

Aim: To investigate the agreement between palatal bone thickness (PBT) measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in a group of white patients considering different facial patterns.

Materials and methods: Measurements performed on lateral cephalograms and CBCT images from 60 white patients (39 females and 21 males; 24.1 ± 6.4 years) were retrospectively compared. On lateral cephalograms, PBT values were measured by drawing lines perpendicular to the maxillary occlusal plane (MOP) at the point of contact between the first and second premolar (P1-P2), second premolar and first molar (P2-M1), and first and second molar (M1-M2), as well as at the buccal cusps of the second premolar (P2) and first molar (M1). On CBCT images, they were measured at the same landmarks at 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm off-centre to the midpalatal suture. Vertical facial pattern of the patients was determined using the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests were used to ascertain the degree of agreement between the two measurement sets (p < 0.05), subsequently quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests.

Results: Good agreement was found at all investigated sites regardless of vertical facial pattern, except at sites P1-P2 and P2 (8 mm off-centre) and M1 and M1-M2 (2 mm off-centre; p < 0.05). The two measurement sets displayed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.8) at P1-P2 (4 mm off-centre), at P2 (2, 4 and 6 mm off-centre), and all P2-M1 sites.

Conclusion: The lateral cephalogram can be a viable option for digital planning of palatal miniscrews insertion, with the preferred sites being P1-P2 at 4 mm off-centre and P2 at 4 and 6 mm off-centre in selected cases for adolescents and young adults. No significant differences in the degree of agreement between the two sets of PBT measurements were found among the different vertical facial patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信