Timothy S Naimi, Jinhui Zhao, Marlene C Lira, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
{"title":"改变国家大麻政策与酒精政策有效性和酒精或大麻参与机动车死亡的关系。","authors":"Timothy S Naimi, Jinhui Zhao, Marlene C Lira, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alcohol use is an established and important risk factor for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and crash fatalities. The liberalization of cannabis policy across U.S. states could impact MVC fatalities involving alcohol or the co-use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mortality data were from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 50 states and Washington DC from 2010-2019. State-year Alcohol Policy Scores (APS) and Cannabis Policy Scores (CPS) were used as measures of policy exposure in multivariable mixed logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of two blood alcohol concentration (BAC) thresholds and/or any detectable tetrahydrocannabinol involvement in crash fatalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In fully adjusted models, a 10-percentage point increase in APS (representing more robust alcohol control policies) was associated with a 6.3% lower risk of a BAC> 0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991) or involvement at a BAC ≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992) among MVC decedents. However, there were no significant independent association between CPS and alcohol involvement. A 10-percentage point increase in CPS (representing more robust cannabis control policies) was associated with reduced odds of cannabis involvement (AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991) or alcohol and cannabis co-involvement (AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More restrictive alcohol policies and cannabis policies were associated with reduced odds of MVC fatalities involving alcohol or cannabis, respectively. Cannabis policies did not affect protective associations between alcohol policies and alcohol involvement. However, more restrictive cannabis policies were protective for co-involvement of alcohol and cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships of Changing State Cannabis Policies with Alcohol Policy Effectiveness and Alcohol or Cannabis Involvement in Motor Vehicle Fatalities.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy S Naimi, Jinhui Zhao, Marlene C Lira, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alcohol use is an established and important risk factor for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and crash fatalities. The liberalization of cannabis policy across U.S. states could impact MVC fatalities involving alcohol or the co-use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mortality data were from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 50 states and Washington DC from 2010-2019. State-year Alcohol Policy Scores (APS) and Cannabis Policy Scores (CPS) were used as measures of policy exposure in multivariable mixed logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of two blood alcohol concentration (BAC) thresholds and/or any detectable tetrahydrocannabinol involvement in crash fatalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In fully adjusted models, a 10-percentage point increase in APS (representing more robust alcohol control policies) was associated with a 6.3% lower risk of a BAC> 0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991) or involvement at a BAC ≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992) among MVC decedents. However, there were no significant independent association between CPS and alcohol involvement. A 10-percentage point increase in CPS (representing more robust cannabis control policies) was associated with reduced odds of cannabis involvement (AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991) or alcohol and cannabis co-involvement (AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More restrictive alcohol policies and cannabis policies were associated with reduced odds of MVC fatalities involving alcohol or cannabis, respectively. Cannabis policies did not affect protective associations between alcohol policies and alcohol involvement. However, more restrictive cannabis policies were protective for co-involvement of alcohol and cannabis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationships of Changing State Cannabis Policies with Alcohol Policy Effectiveness and Alcohol or Cannabis Involvement in Motor Vehicle Fatalities.
Introduction: Alcohol use is an established and important risk factor for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and crash fatalities. The liberalization of cannabis policy across U.S. states could impact MVC fatalities involving alcohol or the co-use of alcohol and cannabis.
Methods: Mortality data were from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 50 states and Washington DC from 2010-2019. State-year Alcohol Policy Scores (APS) and Cannabis Policy Scores (CPS) were used as measures of policy exposure in multivariable mixed logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of two blood alcohol concentration (BAC) thresholds and/or any detectable tetrahydrocannabinol involvement in crash fatalities.
Results: In fully adjusted models, a 10-percentage point increase in APS (representing more robust alcohol control policies) was associated with a 6.3% lower risk of a BAC> 0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991) or involvement at a BAC ≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992) among MVC decedents. However, there were no significant independent association between CPS and alcohol involvement. A 10-percentage point increase in CPS (representing more robust cannabis control policies) was associated with reduced odds of cannabis involvement (AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991) or alcohol and cannabis co-involvement (AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997).
Conclusions: More restrictive alcohol policies and cannabis policies were associated with reduced odds of MVC fatalities involving alcohol or cannabis, respectively. Cannabis policies did not affect protective associations between alcohol policies and alcohol involvement. However, more restrictive cannabis policies were protective for co-involvement of alcohol and cannabis.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.