循环噬菌体DNA区分葡萄球菌感染与共生定植。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Robert Manasherob, Daisuke Furukawa, Naomi L Haddock, Tony H W Chang, Aviv Hargil, Prerna Arora, Niaz Banaei, William J Maloney, Paul L Bollyky, Derek F Amanatullah
{"title":"循环噬菌体DNA区分葡萄球菌感染与共生定植。","authors":"Robert Manasherob, Daisuke Furukawa, Naomi L Haddock, Tony H W Chang, Aviv Hargil, Prerna Arora, Niaz Banaei, William J Maloney, Paul L Bollyky, Derek F Amanatullah","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is challenging. We previously reported on using bacteriophage sequences in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma to diagnose bacterial pathogens in sepsis. Here, we hypothesized that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA can serve as a serological biomarker to monitor staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a previously described computational pipeline, bacteriophage sequences were identified in cfDNA from 35 plasma samples from three distinct patient cohorts: patients who had a current Staphylococcal PJI (n=10), patients with a prior PJI (n=12), and patients with no PJI (n=13). The overall phageome and the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage was described and compared among the three cohorts. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage as a binary variable was also analyzed for its diagnostic performance in identifying Staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in the distribution of bacterial cfDNA among the three cohorts (P = 0.597). The current PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 2.6 versus 0%, P = 0.013), and the prior PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 1.0 versus 0%, P = 0.049). Of note, there was no difference in the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage between current PJI and prior PJI (median, 2.6 versus 1.0%, P = 0.554). Staphylococcus bacteriophage was present in six of 10 samples in the current PJI, seven of 12 samples in the prior PJI, and one of 13 samples in the no PJI groups. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 92% for a Staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA offers a promising approach to detect and monitor staphylococcal PJI. The persistence of these Staphylococcus bacteriophages in prior PJI may reflect subclinical infection or residual microbial DNA undetectable by standard culture-based diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating Bacteriophage DNA Distinguishes Staphylococcal Infection from Commensal Colonization.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Manasherob, Daisuke Furukawa, Naomi L Haddock, Tony H W Chang, Aviv Hargil, Prerna Arora, Niaz Banaei, William J Maloney, Paul L Bollyky, Derek F Amanatullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is challenging. We previously reported on using bacteriophage sequences in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma to diagnose bacterial pathogens in sepsis. Here, we hypothesized that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA can serve as a serological biomarker to monitor staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a previously described computational pipeline, bacteriophage sequences were identified in cfDNA from 35 plasma samples from three distinct patient cohorts: patients who had a current Staphylococcal PJI (n=10), patients with a prior PJI (n=12), and patients with no PJI (n=13). The overall phageome and the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage was described and compared among the three cohorts. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage as a binary variable was also analyzed for its diagnostic performance in identifying Staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in the distribution of bacterial cfDNA among the three cohorts (P = 0.597). The current PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 2.6 versus 0%, P = 0.013), and the prior PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 1.0 versus 0%, P = 0.049). Of note, there was no difference in the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage between current PJI and prior PJI (median, 2.6 versus 1.0%, P = 0.554). Staphylococcus bacteriophage was present in six of 10 samples in the current PJI, seven of 12 samples in the prior PJI, and one of 13 samples in the no PJI groups. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 92% for a Staphylococcal PJI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA offers a promising approach to detect and monitor staphylococcal PJI. The persistence of these Staphylococcus bacteriophages in prior PJI may reflect subclinical infection or residual microbial DNA undetectable by standard culture-based diagnostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.051\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)具有挑战性。我们以前报道过使用血浆中无细胞DNA (cfDNA)中的噬菌体序列来诊断脓毒症中的细菌病原体。在这里,我们假设血浆噬菌体cfDNA可以作为监测葡萄球菌PJI的血清学生物标志物。方法:使用先前描述的计算管道,从来自三个不同患者队列的35个血浆样本的cfDNA中鉴定噬菌体序列:当前患有葡萄球菌PJI的患者(n=10),既往患有PJI的患者(n=12)和无PJI的患者(n=13)。描述并比较三个队列的整体噬菌体和葡萄球菌噬菌体比例。我们还分析了葡萄球菌噬菌体作为二元变量的存在对葡萄球菌PJI的诊断性能。结果:3个队列间细菌cfDNA分布差异无统计学意义(P = 0.597)。当前PJI队列的葡萄球菌噬菌体比例明显高于未PJI队列(中位数为2.6比0%,P = 0.013),先前PJI队列的葡萄球菌噬菌体比例明显高于未PJI队列(中位数为1.0比0%,P = 0.049)。值得注意的是,葡萄球菌噬菌体比例在当前PJI和先前PJI之间没有差异(中位数为2.6 vs 1.0%, P = 0.554)。目前PJI组的10个样本中有6个存在葡萄球菌噬菌体,先前PJI组的12个样本中有7个存在葡萄球菌噬菌体,未PJI组的13个样本中有1个存在葡萄球菌噬菌体。葡萄球菌噬菌体的存在对葡萄球菌PJI的敏感性为60%,特异性为92%。结论:血浆噬菌体cfDNA为检测和监测葡萄球菌PJI提供了一种很有前景的方法。这些葡萄球菌噬菌体在先前PJI中的持续存在可能反映了亚临床感染或基于培养的标准诊断无法检测到的残留微生物DNA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circulating Bacteriophage DNA Distinguishes Staphylococcal Infection from Commensal Colonization.

Background: Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is challenging. We previously reported on using bacteriophage sequences in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma to diagnose bacterial pathogens in sepsis. Here, we hypothesized that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA can serve as a serological biomarker to monitor staphylococcal PJI.

Methods: Using a previously described computational pipeline, bacteriophage sequences were identified in cfDNA from 35 plasma samples from three distinct patient cohorts: patients who had a current Staphylococcal PJI (n=10), patients with a prior PJI (n=12), and patients with no PJI (n=13). The overall phageome and the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage was described and compared among the three cohorts. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage as a binary variable was also analyzed for its diagnostic performance in identifying Staphylococcal PJI.

Results: There were no differences in the distribution of bacterial cfDNA among the three cohorts (P = 0.597). The current PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 2.6 versus 0%, P = 0.013), and the prior PJI cohort had a significantly higher proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage compared to no PJI (median, 1.0 versus 0%, P = 0.049). Of note, there was no difference in the proportion of Staphylococcus bacteriophage between current PJI and prior PJI (median, 2.6 versus 1.0%, P = 0.554). Staphylococcus bacteriophage was present in six of 10 samples in the current PJI, seven of 12 samples in the prior PJI, and one of 13 samples in the no PJI groups. The presence of Staphylococcus bacteriophage had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 92% for a Staphylococcal PJI.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that plasma bacteriophage cfDNA offers a promising approach to detect and monitor staphylococcal PJI. The persistence of these Staphylococcus bacteriophages in prior PJI may reflect subclinical infection or residual microbial DNA undetectable by standard culture-based diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信