军事队列中手持式髋关节和膝关节动态测量的内部和内部可靠性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Robyn P Cassidy, K M Lunt, L Gray, R J Coppack, P Ladlow, J L Bilzon
{"title":"军事队列中手持式髋关节和膝关节动态测量的内部和内部可靠性。","authors":"Robyn P Cassidy, K M Lunt, L Gray, R J Coppack, P Ladlow, J L Bilzon","doi":"10.1136/military-2025-003073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) are widely used to measure isometric muscle force in clinical practice. However, reliability may be affected when there is a difference in muscle force generation between examiner and patient, raising concerns about accuracy in physically trained populations, such as military personnel. This study aimed to examine the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of HHD for lower limb strength assessment in a healthy military population. Secondary aims were to evaluate the validity of HHD for knee extensor strength compared with fixed dynamometry and explore the impact of assessor and participant characteristics on reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with test-retest reliability and concurrent validity design was conducted with 30 healthy military personnel (mean age: 32±6 years; 24 males; 6 females). Peak isometric lower limb force was measured across six positions using HHDs (Lafayette, USA) by three assessors across two sessions. Knee extensor strength was also assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, USA). Intrarater and inter-rater relative reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and absolute reliability with SEM and minimal detectable change (MDC). Concurrent validity was determined using Pearson's correlation, and systematic bias was analysed through limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability was good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.1%-6.3%; MDC% 5.2%-17.6%) across all positions except one assessor in hip extension (ICC=0.70). Inter-rater reliability was also good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.2%-5.5%; MDC% 6.1%-15.4%). HHD demonstrated strong validity compared with isokinetic dynamometry (r=0.80-0.819, p<0.001) despite a systematic bias with lower values. No correlation was found between peak force and inter-rater variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HHD is a reliable tool for lower limb strength assessment in military personnel. Although absolute values are lower than fixed dynamometry, relative comparisons over time remain valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometry of the hip and knee in a military cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn P Cassidy, K M Lunt, L Gray, R J Coppack, P Ladlow, J L Bilzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2025-003073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) are widely used to measure isometric muscle force in clinical practice. However, reliability may be affected when there is a difference in muscle force generation between examiner and patient, raising concerns about accuracy in physically trained populations, such as military personnel. This study aimed to examine the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of HHD for lower limb strength assessment in a healthy military population. Secondary aims were to evaluate the validity of HHD for knee extensor strength compared with fixed dynamometry and explore the impact of assessor and participant characteristics on reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with test-retest reliability and concurrent validity design was conducted with 30 healthy military personnel (mean age: 32±6 years; 24 males; 6 females). Peak isometric lower limb force was measured across six positions using HHDs (Lafayette, USA) by three assessors across two sessions. Knee extensor strength was also assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, USA). Intrarater and inter-rater relative reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and absolute reliability with SEM and minimal detectable change (MDC). Concurrent validity was determined using Pearson's correlation, and systematic bias was analysed through limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability was good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.1%-6.3%; MDC% 5.2%-17.6%) across all positions except one assessor in hip extension (ICC=0.70). Inter-rater reliability was also good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.2%-5.5%; MDC% 6.1%-15.4%). HHD demonstrated strong validity compared with isokinetic dynamometry (r=0.80-0.819, p<0.001) despite a systematic bias with lower values. No correlation was found between peak force and inter-rater variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HHD is a reliable tool for lower limb strength assessment in military personnel. Although absolute values are lower than fixed dynamometry, relative comparisons over time remain valid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-003073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-003073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在临床实践中,手持式测力仪(HHDs)被广泛用于测量等长肌力。然而,当审查员和患者之间肌肉力量产生的差异时,可靠性可能会受到影响,这引起了对身体训练人群(如军事人员)准确性的担忧。本研究旨在检验HHD在健康军人中用于下肢力量评估的量表间和量表内的可靠性。次要目的是评估HHD对膝关节伸肌力量的有效性,并与固定动力测量法进行比较,探讨评估者和参与者特征对可靠性的影响。方法:采用横截面研究,采用重测信度和并行效度设计,对30名健康军人(平均年龄32±6岁,男24名,女6名)进行研究。使用hdd (Lafayette, USA),由三名评估员在两个疗程中测量了六个体位的峰值等长下肢力。膝关节伸肌力量也使用等速测力仪(Biodex,美国)进行评估。用类内相关系数(ICC)评估了类内和类间的相对信度,用SEM和最小可检测变化(MDC)评估了绝对信度。使用Pearson相关确定并发效度,并通过一致性限分析系统偏倚。结果:除了髋关节伸展的一个评估者(ICC=0.70)外,所有体位的评分者内信度都是良至优(ICC= 0.75; SEM% 2.1%-6.3%; MDC% 5.2%-17.6%)。评估者之间的信度也从良好到优秀(ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.2%-5.5%; MDC% 6.1%-15.4%)。结论:HHD是一种可靠的评估军事人员下肢力量的工具。虽然绝对值低于固定测力法,但随时间的相对比较仍然有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometry of the hip and knee in a military cohort.

Introduction: Hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) are widely used to measure isometric muscle force in clinical practice. However, reliability may be affected when there is a difference in muscle force generation between examiner and patient, raising concerns about accuracy in physically trained populations, such as military personnel. This study aimed to examine the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of HHD for lower limb strength assessment in a healthy military population. Secondary aims were to evaluate the validity of HHD for knee extensor strength compared with fixed dynamometry and explore the impact of assessor and participant characteristics on reliability.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with test-retest reliability and concurrent validity design was conducted with 30 healthy military personnel (mean age: 32±6 years; 24 males; 6 females). Peak isometric lower limb force was measured across six positions using HHDs (Lafayette, USA) by three assessors across two sessions. Knee extensor strength was also assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, USA). Intrarater and inter-rater relative reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and absolute reliability with SEM and minimal detectable change (MDC). Concurrent validity was determined using Pearson's correlation, and systematic bias was analysed through limits of agreement.

Results: Intra-rater reliability was good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.1%-6.3%; MDC% 5.2%-17.6%) across all positions except one assessor in hip extension (ICC=0.70). Inter-rater reliability was also good-to-excellent (ICC>0.75; SEM% 2.2%-5.5%; MDC% 6.1%-15.4%). HHD demonstrated strong validity compared with isokinetic dynamometry (r=0.80-0.819, p<0.001) despite a systematic bias with lower values. No correlation was found between peak force and inter-rater variability.

Conclusions: HHD is a reliable tool for lower limb strength assessment in military personnel. Although absolute values are lower than fixed dynamometry, relative comparisons over time remain valid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信