预防精神科环境中的攻击行为:最佳实践实施项目。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Louis Prod'hom, Stéphanie Mahé, Pierre Lequin, Dorota Drozdek, Béatrice Perrenoud
{"title":"预防精神科环境中的攻击行为:最佳实践实施项目。","authors":"Louis Prod'hom, Stéphanie Mahé, Pierre Lequin, Dorota Drozdek, Béatrice Perrenoud","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aggression is a frequent occurrence in psychiatric settings and results from complex multifactorial phenomena. Verbal or physical aggression has a significant impact on the quality of care, with negative repercussions on patients, professionals, and health care institutions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project aimed to prevent and manage hetero-aggression in a university hospital psychiatric department in Switzerland through the promotion of evidence-based practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project used JBI's Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices for preventing and managing aggression and compare these to eight best practice recommendations. Interventions to improve compliance with best practices were implemented, and a follow-up audit was conducted to measure the changes achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite a high prevalence of staff exposure to aggression, the baseline audit showed that violence risk assessments were not systematically documented. The follow-up audit revealed improvements, with the use of a validated screening tool to identify violence risk and increased prevention interventions. However, these measures had a relatively low impact on the exposure to violence of health care professionals. Patient involvement in the violence risk assessment also remained low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The JBI approach used in this project led to significant improvements in professional practices related to violence risk assessment and reduced the gaps between recommendations and clinical practices. Clinical practice analysis sessions are a successful means of promoting understanding of prevention interventions.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A410.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing aggression in psychiatric settings: a best practice implementation project.\",\"authors\":\"Louis Prod'hom, Stéphanie Mahé, Pierre Lequin, Dorota Drozdek, Béatrice Perrenoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aggression is a frequent occurrence in psychiatric settings and results from complex multifactorial phenomena. Verbal or physical aggression has a significant impact on the quality of care, with negative repercussions on patients, professionals, and health care institutions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project aimed to prevent and manage hetero-aggression in a university hospital psychiatric department in Switzerland through the promotion of evidence-based practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project used JBI's Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices for preventing and managing aggression and compare these to eight best practice recommendations. Interventions to improve compliance with best practices were implemented, and a follow-up audit was conducted to measure the changes achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite a high prevalence of staff exposure to aggression, the baseline audit showed that violence risk assessments were not systematically documented. The follow-up audit revealed improvements, with the use of a validated screening tool to identify violence risk and increased prevention interventions. However, these measures had a relatively low impact on the exposure to violence of health care professionals. Patient involvement in the violence risk assessment also remained low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The JBI approach used in this project led to significant improvements in professional practices related to violence risk assessment and reduced the gaps between recommendations and clinical practices. Clinical practice analysis sessions are a successful means of promoting understanding of prevention interventions.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A410.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000535\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:攻击行为在精神病学中经常发生,是由复杂的多因素现象引起的。言语或身体攻击对护理质量有重大影响,对患者、专业人员和卫生保健机构产生负面影响。目标:本项目旨在通过促进循证实践,预防和管理瑞士一所大学医院精神病科的异性侵犯行为。方法:该项目采用了JBI的证据实施框架,该框架以审计和反馈过程为基础。进行了基线审计,以衡量预防和管理侵略的当前实践,并将其与8个最佳实践建议进行比较。实施了改善遵守最佳做法的干预措施,并进行了后续审计,以衡量所取得的变化。结果:尽管工作人员遭受攻击的发生率很高,但基线审计显示,暴力风险评估没有系统记录。后续审计显示情况有所改善,使用了一种有效的筛查工具来识别暴力风险,并增加了预防干预措施。然而,这些措施对保健专业人员遭受暴力的影响相对较低。患者参与暴力风险评估的比例也很低。结论:本项目中使用的JBI方法显著改善了与暴力风险评估相关的专业实践,并缩小了建议与临床实践之间的差距。临床实践分析会议是促进了解预防干预措施的成功手段。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A410。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventing aggression in psychiatric settings: a best practice implementation project.

Introduction: Aggression is a frequent occurrence in psychiatric settings and results from complex multifactorial phenomena. Verbal or physical aggression has a significant impact on the quality of care, with negative repercussions on patients, professionals, and health care institutions.

Objectives: This project aimed to prevent and manage hetero-aggression in a university hospital psychiatric department in Switzerland through the promotion of evidence-based practices.

Methods: The project used JBI's Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices for preventing and managing aggression and compare these to eight best practice recommendations. Interventions to improve compliance with best practices were implemented, and a follow-up audit was conducted to measure the changes achieved.

Results: Despite a high prevalence of staff exposure to aggression, the baseline audit showed that violence risk assessments were not systematically documented. The follow-up audit revealed improvements, with the use of a validated screening tool to identify violence risk and increased prevention interventions. However, these measures had a relatively low impact on the exposure to violence of health care professionals. Patient involvement in the violence risk assessment also remained low.

Conclusions: The JBI approach used in this project led to significant improvements in professional practices related to violence risk assessment and reduced the gaps between recommendations and clinical practices. Clinical practice analysis sessions are a successful means of promoting understanding of prevention interventions.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A410.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信