Z Benoit, N O Rosen, M Renaud, M A Rossi, A Brassard, S Bergeron, B Carranza Mamane, K Péloquin
{"title":"生殖之旅:2S/LGBTQIA+和混合性别/性别夫妇接受医学辅助生殖的患者中心护理和幸福感比较分析","authors":"Z Benoit, N O Rosen, M Renaud, M A Rossi, A Brassard, S Bergeron, B Carranza Mamane, K Péloquin","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2570429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative studies on mixed-sex/gender couples show that infertility and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) impact psychological and relational well-being, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care. However, little is known about the experiences of 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples who primarily seek MAR due to social infertility. While qualitative findings suggest unique barriers to sensitive care, quantitative comparisons remain limited. This study compared personal and relational well-being, along with perceptions of patient-centered care, between 2S/LGBTQIA+ and mixed-sex/gender couples undergoing MAR. The sample included 345 Canadian and American couples (80 2S/LGBTQIA+, 265 mixed-sex/gender) recruited from fertility clinics and online platforms. Participants completed the Patient-Centredness Questionnaire-Infertility, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Brief Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Dyadic Coping Inventory. Mixed-effect models adjusted for sociodemographic factors revealed no group differences in anxiety or perceived patient-centered care. However, mixed-sex/gender couples reported significantly higher depressive symptoms (<i>p</i> = .008, d = 0.33), while 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples showed higher relationship satisfaction (<i>p</i> = .004, d = -0.33) and greater use of common dyadic coping strategies (<i>p</i> = .016, d = -0.31). These findings highlight relational strengths among 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples despite potential access barriers. Future research should further explore diverse MAR experiences to inform inclusive, sensitive, and equitable fertility care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive Journeys: A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Centered Care and Well-Being in 2S/LGBTQIA+ and Mixed-Sex/Gender Couples Undergoing Medically Assisted Reproduction.\",\"authors\":\"Z Benoit, N O Rosen, M Renaud, M A Rossi, A Brassard, S Bergeron, B Carranza Mamane, K Péloquin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2570429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative studies on mixed-sex/gender couples show that infertility and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) impact psychological and relational well-being, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care. However, little is known about the experiences of 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples who primarily seek MAR due to social infertility. While qualitative findings suggest unique barriers to sensitive care, quantitative comparisons remain limited. This study compared personal and relational well-being, along with perceptions of patient-centered care, between 2S/LGBTQIA+ and mixed-sex/gender couples undergoing MAR. The sample included 345 Canadian and American couples (80 2S/LGBTQIA+, 265 mixed-sex/gender) recruited from fertility clinics and online platforms. Participants completed the Patient-Centredness Questionnaire-Infertility, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Brief Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Dyadic Coping Inventory. Mixed-effect models adjusted for sociodemographic factors revealed no group differences in anxiety or perceived patient-centered care. However, mixed-sex/gender couples reported significantly higher depressive symptoms (<i>p</i> = .008, d = 0.33), while 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples showed higher relationship satisfaction (<i>p</i> = .004, d = -0.33) and greater use of common dyadic coping strategies (<i>p</i> = .016, d = -0.31). These findings highlight relational strengths among 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples despite potential access barriers. Future research should further explore diverse MAR experiences to inform inclusive, sensitive, and equitable fertility care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2570429\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2570429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对混合性别/性别夫妇的定量研究表明,不孕症和医学辅助生殖(MAR)影响心理和关系健康,强调需要以患者为中心的护理。然而,对于2S/LGBTQIA+夫妇主要因社交不孕症而寻求MAR的经历知之甚少。虽然定性研究结果表明敏感护理的独特障碍,但定量比较仍然有限。本研究比较了接受marr的2S/LGBTQIA+和混合性别/性别夫妇的个人和关系幸福感,以及对以患者为中心的护理的看法。样本包括从生育诊所和在线平台招募的345对加拿大和美国夫妇(80对2S/LGBTQIA+, 265对混合性别/性别)。参与者完成了以患者为中心的不孕症问卷、医院焦虑和抑郁量表、简短二元调整量表和二元应对量表。经社会人口因素调整的混合效应模型显示,在焦虑或感知到的以病人为中心的护理方面没有组间差异。然而,混合性别/性别夫妇报告的抑郁症状明显更高(p =。2008年,d = 0.33),而2S/LGBTQIA+夫妻的关系满意度更高(p = 0.33)。004, d = -0.33)和更多地使用常见的二元应对策略(p =。016, d = -0.31)。这些发现强调了2S/LGBTQIA+伴侣之间的关系优势,尽管存在潜在的接触障碍。未来的研究应进一步探索不同的MAR经验,为包容、敏感和公平的生育护理提供信息。
Reproductive Journeys: A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Centered Care and Well-Being in 2S/LGBTQIA+ and Mixed-Sex/Gender Couples Undergoing Medically Assisted Reproduction.
Quantitative studies on mixed-sex/gender couples show that infertility and medically assisted reproduction (MAR) impact psychological and relational well-being, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care. However, little is known about the experiences of 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples who primarily seek MAR due to social infertility. While qualitative findings suggest unique barriers to sensitive care, quantitative comparisons remain limited. This study compared personal and relational well-being, along with perceptions of patient-centered care, between 2S/LGBTQIA+ and mixed-sex/gender couples undergoing MAR. The sample included 345 Canadian and American couples (80 2S/LGBTQIA+, 265 mixed-sex/gender) recruited from fertility clinics and online platforms. Participants completed the Patient-Centredness Questionnaire-Infertility, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Brief Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Dyadic Coping Inventory. Mixed-effect models adjusted for sociodemographic factors revealed no group differences in anxiety or perceived patient-centered care. However, mixed-sex/gender couples reported significantly higher depressive symptoms (p = .008, d = 0.33), while 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples showed higher relationship satisfaction (p = .004, d = -0.33) and greater use of common dyadic coping strategies (p = .016, d = -0.31). These findings highlight relational strengths among 2S/LGBTQIA+ couples despite potential access barriers. Future research should further explore diverse MAR experiences to inform inclusive, sensitive, and equitable fertility care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.