美沙酮治疗盆底病变伴顽固性癌性疼痛36例回顾性分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tetsumi Sato, Shigeki Ono, Taiichi Kawamura, Akira Fukutomi, Tetsu Sato, Yoshiko Kamo, Shota Hagiya, Tomomi Suzuki, Rei Tanaka
{"title":"美沙酮治疗盆底病变伴顽固性癌性疼痛36例回顾性分析","authors":"Tetsumi Sato, Shigeki Ono, Taiichi Kawamura, Akira Fukutomi, Tetsu Sato, Yoshiko Kamo, Shota Hagiya, Tomomi Suzuki, Rei Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09932-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of methadone for refractory cancer pain caused by pelvic floor lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 2016 and September 2023, we retrospectively investigated all cases in which methadone was administered by our Palliative Care Team for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions, based on the electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted cases totaled 36 (21 females), and the age was 55.1 ± 15.1 years. The primary sites of malignancy were rectum, colon, and uterine cervix, each of which accounted for nine cases, and others in nine. The causes of refractory pain included pelvic tumors in 36, sacral metastasis/infiltration in 7, and others in 11 (with some overlaps). The prior opioid dosage (oral morphine equivalent) (median, (IQR)) was 168.0 (95.3, 352.5) mg/day. The starting, maximum, and final doses of methadone were 20.0 (10.0, 20.0), 20.0 (13.8, 40.0), and 20.0 (10.0, 37.5) mg/day, respectively, with a treatment duration of 28.0 (16.0, 97.5) days. The pain intensity in NRS on the day before (before) and 7 days after (after) the introduction of methadone was 6.0 (5.0, 8.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 5.0), respectively (p < 0.001). The numbers of rescue medications before and after the introduction of methadone were 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) and 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) times/day, respectively (p = 0.0015). Side effects that led to the discontinuation of methadone included nausea and dizziness in one case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methadone is suggested to be an effective and safe treatment option for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 11","pages":"928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methadone for intractable cancer pain associated with pelvic floor lesions: a retrospective analysis of 36 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsumi Sato, Shigeki Ono, Taiichi Kawamura, Akira Fukutomi, Tetsu Sato, Yoshiko Kamo, Shota Hagiya, Tomomi Suzuki, Rei Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09932-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of methadone for refractory cancer pain caused by pelvic floor lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 2016 and September 2023, we retrospectively investigated all cases in which methadone was administered by our Palliative Care Team for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions, based on the electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted cases totaled 36 (21 females), and the age was 55.1 ± 15.1 years. The primary sites of malignancy were rectum, colon, and uterine cervix, each of which accounted for nine cases, and others in nine. The causes of refractory pain included pelvic tumors in 36, sacral metastasis/infiltration in 7, and others in 11 (with some overlaps). The prior opioid dosage (oral morphine equivalent) (median, (IQR)) was 168.0 (95.3, 352.5) mg/day. The starting, maximum, and final doses of methadone were 20.0 (10.0, 20.0), 20.0 (13.8, 40.0), and 20.0 (10.0, 37.5) mg/day, respectively, with a treatment duration of 28.0 (16.0, 97.5) days. The pain intensity in NRS on the day before (before) and 7 days after (after) the introduction of methadone was 6.0 (5.0, 8.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 5.0), respectively (p < 0.001). The numbers of rescue medications before and after the introduction of methadone were 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) and 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) times/day, respectively (p = 0.0015). Side effects that led to the discontinuation of methadone included nausea and dizziness in one case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methadone is suggested to be an effective and safe treatment option for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09932-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09932-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨美沙酮治疗盆底病变引起的难治性癌性疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:2016年4月至2023年9月,我们回顾性调查了所有由姑息治疗团队使用美沙酮治疗盆底病变难治性癌性疼痛的病例,基于电子病历。结果:共取出病例36例,其中女性21例,年龄55.1±15.1岁。恶性肿瘤的原发部位为直肠、结肠和子宫颈,各占9例,其他部位占9例。难治性疼痛的原因包括36例盆腔肿瘤,7例骶骨转移/浸润,11例其他原因(有一些重叠)。既往阿片类药物剂量(口服吗啡当量)(中位数,(IQR))为168.0 (95.3,352.5)mg/天。美沙酮的起始、最大和最终剂量分别为20.0(10.0,20.0)、20.0(13.8,40.0)和20.0 (10.0,37.5)mg/天,治疗持续时间为28.0(16.0,97.5)天。美沙酮引入前一天(前)和7天后(后)NRS疼痛强度分别为6.0(5.0、8.0)和4.0(2.0、5.0)(p)。结论:美沙酮是治疗盆底病变难治性癌性疼痛的有效、安全的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methadone for intractable cancer pain associated with pelvic floor lesions: a retrospective analysis of 36 cases.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of methadone for refractory cancer pain caused by pelvic floor lesions.

Methods: Between April 2016 and September 2023, we retrospectively investigated all cases in which methadone was administered by our Palliative Care Team for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions, based on the electronic medical records.

Results: The extracted cases totaled 36 (21 females), and the age was 55.1 ± 15.1 years. The primary sites of malignancy were rectum, colon, and uterine cervix, each of which accounted for nine cases, and others in nine. The causes of refractory pain included pelvic tumors in 36, sacral metastasis/infiltration in 7, and others in 11 (with some overlaps). The prior opioid dosage (oral morphine equivalent) (median, (IQR)) was 168.0 (95.3, 352.5) mg/day. The starting, maximum, and final doses of methadone were 20.0 (10.0, 20.0), 20.0 (13.8, 40.0), and 20.0 (10.0, 37.5) mg/day, respectively, with a treatment duration of 28.0 (16.0, 97.5) days. The pain intensity in NRS on the day before (before) and 7 days after (after) the introduction of methadone was 6.0 (5.0, 8.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 5.0), respectively (p < 0.001). The numbers of rescue medications before and after the introduction of methadone were 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) and 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) times/day, respectively (p = 0.0015). Side effects that led to the discontinuation of methadone included nausea and dizziness in one case.

Conclusion: Methadone is suggested to be an effective and safe treatment option for refractory cancer pain due to pelvic floor lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信