兴奋剂使用者认知功能的时间变化及其相关因素:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Albert Kar Kin Chung, Cheuk Yin Tse, Y Doug Dong, Sau Wan Tang, Johnson Kai Chun Law, Edward Tin Kei Leung, Tommy Tsang Cheung
{"title":"兴奋剂使用者认知功能的时间变化及其相关因素:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Albert Kar Kin Chung, Cheuk Yin Tse, Y Doug Dong, Sau Wan Tang, Johnson Kai Chun Law, Edward Tin Kei Leung, Tommy Tsang Cheung","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-20028-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairments are commonly observed in individuals who use stimulants, yet few studies have tracked these individuals longitudinally. This prospective, 12-month longitudinal study investigated changes in cognitive functioning among active stimulant users and explored the associated factors. Adults with recent stimulant use were recruited from substance misuse treatment clinics and the community. Their demographics, history of drug use, and stimulant use disorder severity were assessed with structured clinical interviews. Global cognitive function and frontal executive function were measured every three months using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) over one year. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated temporal trajectories and associated factors related to the Changes in cognitive functions. Among 76 analysed participants, their frequency of stimulant uses were active and stable over 12 months. The MoCA scores averaged below the clinical cut-off at baseline, although no further persistent decline was observed. In contrast, FAB scores presented no systematic temporal changes. Being female and being of older ages were found to be associated with lower MoCA and FAB. None of severity, education, recent stimulant use, and lifetime duration of use, were found to be associated with cognition. While stimulant users exhibited some modest cognitive declines at baseline, no further substantial cognitive deterioration was observed over the one-year study period. Cognitive outcomes were more strongly associated with demographic factors than SUD severity or stimulant use patterns. These findings highlight the need for more sensitive tools to detect subtle cognitive changes associated with stimulant uses.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal changes in cognitive functions and associated factors among stimulant users: a 12-month, prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Albert Kar Kin Chung, Cheuk Yin Tse, Y Doug Dong, Sau Wan Tang, Johnson Kai Chun Law, Edward Tin Kei Leung, Tommy Tsang Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-20028-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive impairments are commonly observed in individuals who use stimulants, yet few studies have tracked these individuals longitudinally. This prospective, 12-month longitudinal study investigated changes in cognitive functioning among active stimulant users and explored the associated factors. Adults with recent stimulant use were recruited from substance misuse treatment clinics and the community. Their demographics, history of drug use, and stimulant use disorder severity were assessed with structured clinical interviews. Global cognitive function and frontal executive function were measured every three months using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) over one year. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated temporal trajectories and associated factors related to the Changes in cognitive functions. Among 76 analysed participants, their frequency of stimulant uses were active and stable over 12 months. The MoCA scores averaged below the clinical cut-off at baseline, although no further persistent decline was observed. In contrast, FAB scores presented no systematic temporal changes. Being female and being of older ages were found to be associated with lower MoCA and FAB. None of severity, education, recent stimulant use, and lifetime duration of use, were found to be associated with cognition. While stimulant users exhibited some modest cognitive declines at baseline, no further substantial cognitive deterioration was observed over the one-year study period. Cognitive outcomes were more strongly associated with demographic factors than SUD severity or stimulant use patterns. These findings highlight the need for more sensitive tools to detect subtle cognitive changes associated with stimulant uses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20028-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20028-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知障碍通常在使用兴奋剂的个体中观察到,但很少有研究对这些个体进行纵向追踪。这项前瞻性的、为期12个月的纵向研究调查了活跃兴奋剂使用者认知功能的变化,并探讨了相关因素。最近使用兴奋剂的成年人是从药物滥用治疗诊所和社区招募的。他们的人口统计、药物使用史和兴奋剂使用障碍严重程度通过结构化的临床访谈进行评估。每三个月使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和额叶评估电池(FAB)测量全球认知功能和额叶执行功能,持续一年。线性混合效应模型评估了与认知功能变化相关的时间轨迹和相关因素。在分析的76名参与者中,他们使用兴奋剂的频率在12个月内是活跃和稳定的。MoCA评分平均低于基线的临床临界值,尽管没有观察到进一步的持续下降。相比之下,FAB评分没有系统的时间变化。女性和老年人与较低的MoCA和FAB有关。没有发现严重程度、教育程度、最近使用兴奋剂和终生使用时间与认知有关。虽然兴奋剂使用者在基线时表现出一些适度的认知能力下降,但在一年的研究期间没有观察到进一步的实质性认知能力下降。与SUD严重程度或兴奋剂使用模式相比,认知结果与人口学因素的相关性更强。这些发现强调需要更灵敏的工具来检测与兴奋剂使用相关的细微认知变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal changes in cognitive functions and associated factors among stimulant users: a 12-month, prospective study.

Cognitive impairments are commonly observed in individuals who use stimulants, yet few studies have tracked these individuals longitudinally. This prospective, 12-month longitudinal study investigated changes in cognitive functioning among active stimulant users and explored the associated factors. Adults with recent stimulant use were recruited from substance misuse treatment clinics and the community. Their demographics, history of drug use, and stimulant use disorder severity were assessed with structured clinical interviews. Global cognitive function and frontal executive function were measured every three months using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) over one year. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated temporal trajectories and associated factors related to the Changes in cognitive functions. Among 76 analysed participants, their frequency of stimulant uses were active and stable over 12 months. The MoCA scores averaged below the clinical cut-off at baseline, although no further persistent decline was observed. In contrast, FAB scores presented no systematic temporal changes. Being female and being of older ages were found to be associated with lower MoCA and FAB. None of severity, education, recent stimulant use, and lifetime duration of use, were found to be associated with cognition. While stimulant users exhibited some modest cognitive declines at baseline, no further substantial cognitive deterioration was observed over the one-year study period. Cognitive outcomes were more strongly associated with demographic factors than SUD severity or stimulant use patterns. These findings highlight the need for more sensitive tools to detect subtle cognitive changes associated with stimulant uses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信