{"title":"急诊科质量改善计划改善台湾脑卒中患者预后:一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Yen-Jung Chu, Hong-Mo Shih, Yeong-Ruey Chu, Pei-Tseng Kung, Wen-Chen Tsai","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19386-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2012, Taiwan implemented the Emergency Department Quality Improvement Program (EDQIP) to enhance the quality of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This retrospective study evaluated the program's effectiveness using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. AIS patients were classified into three groups: a pre-implementation group (2011), and a post-implementation group (2013-2015), which was further subdivided into EDQIP and non-EDQIP groups based on hospital participation and receipt of performance-based incentives. Among 169,434 AIS cases identified between 2013 and 2015, 64,574 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the non-EDQIP group, patients in the EDQIP group demonstrated a 9% absolute reduction in the 30-day mortality rate (6% vs. 15%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.50) and a 2% absolute reduction in the 72-hour emergency department revisits rate (5% vs. 7%). Additionally, the EDQIP group showed a 9% absolute reduction in 30-day mortality rate compared to the pre-EDQIP group (6% vs. 15%; aHR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.31-0.49). These findings suggest that the EDQIP may be associated with improved clinical outcomes for AIS patients in Taiwan and may serve as a model for similar quality improvement initiatives worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emergency department quality improvement program improves the prognosis of patients with stroke in Taiwan: A nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Jung Chu, Hong-Mo Shih, Yeong-Ruey Chu, Pei-Tseng Kung, Wen-Chen Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-19386-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2012, Taiwan implemented the Emergency Department Quality Improvement Program (EDQIP) to enhance the quality of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This retrospective study evaluated the program's effectiveness using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. AIS patients were classified into three groups: a pre-implementation group (2011), and a post-implementation group (2013-2015), which was further subdivided into EDQIP and non-EDQIP groups based on hospital participation and receipt of performance-based incentives. Among 169,434 AIS cases identified between 2013 and 2015, 64,574 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the non-EDQIP group, patients in the EDQIP group demonstrated a 9% absolute reduction in the 30-day mortality rate (6% vs. 15%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.50) and a 2% absolute reduction in the 72-hour emergency department revisits rate (5% vs. 7%). Additionally, the EDQIP group showed a 9% absolute reduction in 30-day mortality rate compared to the pre-EDQIP group (6% vs. 15%; aHR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.31-0.49). These findings suggest that the EDQIP may be associated with improved clinical outcomes for AIS patients in Taiwan and may serve as a model for similar quality improvement initiatives worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19386-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19386-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The emergency department quality improvement program improves the prognosis of patients with stroke in Taiwan: A nationwide cohort study.
In 2012, Taiwan implemented the Emergency Department Quality Improvement Program (EDQIP) to enhance the quality of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This retrospective study evaluated the program's effectiveness using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. AIS patients were classified into three groups: a pre-implementation group (2011), and a post-implementation group (2013-2015), which was further subdivided into EDQIP and non-EDQIP groups based on hospital participation and receipt of performance-based incentives. Among 169,434 AIS cases identified between 2013 and 2015, 64,574 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the non-EDQIP group, patients in the EDQIP group demonstrated a 9% absolute reduction in the 30-day mortality rate (6% vs. 15%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.50) and a 2% absolute reduction in the 72-hour emergency department revisits rate (5% vs. 7%). Additionally, the EDQIP group showed a 9% absolute reduction in 30-day mortality rate compared to the pre-EDQIP group (6% vs. 15%; aHR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.31-0.49). These findings suggest that the EDQIP may be associated with improved clinical outcomes for AIS patients in Taiwan and may serve as a model for similar quality improvement initiatives worldwide.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.