动态音桥植入后的预测因素和结果的综合分析-前瞻性研究的第一部分。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach
{"title":"动态音桥植入后的预测因素和结果的综合分析-前瞻性研究的第一部分。","authors":"Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRS<sub>max</sub>), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS<sub>65dB</sub>). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS<sub>65dB</sub> were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS<sub>65dB</sub> was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRS<sub>max</sub> (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRS<sub>max</sub> and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive analysis of predictors and outcomes following Vibrant Soundbridge implantation - part 1 of a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRS<sub>max</sub>), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS<sub>65dB</sub>). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS<sub>65dB</sub> were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS<sub>65dB</sub> was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRS<sub>max</sub> (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRS<sub>max</sub> and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动中耳植入物,如动态声桥(VSB),是传统助听器不足时传导性或混合性听力损失患者的有效治疗选择。然而,术后的语音清晰度差异很大,即使在听力特征相似的患者中也是如此。这是一项两部分前瞻性观察性研究的第一部分,旨在分析结果并确定临床可获得的术后言语清晰度预测因素。包括20例接受单侧VSB植入的成年人。听力学评估包括术后骨传导(BC)、振动图(VIB)、自由场阈值、最大独立语音清晰度(WRSmax)和65dB声级下的辅助语音清晰度(WRS65dB)。其他参数包括耦合效率、有效增益、动态范围、响度缩放和患者报告的结果(PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12)。采用Spearman相关分析(ρ)确定WRS65dB的关键预测因子。术后平均WRS65dB为81.5% (SD = 9.0%)。与年龄(ρ = - 0.63)、人工耳蜗储备指标WRSmax (ρ = 0.56)和术后BCPTA4 (ρ = - 0.52)相关性最强。PROMs证实了较高的主观效益,并显示出与听力学结果的相关性。年龄、WRSmax和术后BCPTA4将作为第二部分中基于人工智能的预测模型的基础。PROMs与听力学结果的相关性强调了在听力康复中综合客观和主观措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive analysis of predictors and outcomes following Vibrant Soundbridge implantation - part 1 of a prospective study.

Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRSmax), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS65dB). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS65dB were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS65dB was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRSmax (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BCPTA4 (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRSmax and postoperative BCPTA4 will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信