Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach
{"title":"动态音桥植入后的预测因素和结果的综合分析-前瞻性研究的第一部分。","authors":"Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRS<sub>max</sub>), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS<sub>65dB</sub>). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS<sub>65dB</sub> were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS<sub>65dB</sub> was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRS<sub>max</sub> (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRS<sub>max</sub> and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive analysis of predictors and outcomes following Vibrant Soundbridge implantation - part 1 of a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Müller, Hannes Seidler, Anna Tsypina, Janina Kuch, Thomas Zahnert, Susen Lailach\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRS<sub>max</sub>), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS<sub>65dB</sub>). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS<sub>65dB</sub> were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS<sub>65dB</sub> was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRS<sub>max</sub> (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRS<sub>max</sub> and postoperative BC<sub>PTA4</sub> will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20966-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comprehensive analysis of predictors and outcomes following Vibrant Soundbridge implantation - part 1 of a prospective study.
Active middle ear implants such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) represent effective treatment options for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient. Nevertheless, postoperative speech intelligibility varies considerably, even among patients with comparable audiometric profiles. This first part of a two-part prospective observational study aimed to analyze outcomes and identify clinically accessible predictors of postoperative speech intelligibility. Twenty adults who underwent unilateral VSB implantation were included. Audiological assessments comprised postoperative bone conduction (BC), Vibrogram (VIB), free-field thresholds, maximum unaided speech intelligibility (WRSmax), and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB SPL (WRS65dB). Additional parameters included coupling efficiency, effective gain, dynamic range, loudness scaling, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; IOI-HA, SSQ12). Key predictors of WRS65dB were identified using Spearman correlation analysis (ρ). The mean postoperative WRS65dB was 81.5% (SD = 9.0%). The strongest correlations were observed with age (ρ = - 0.63) and two surrogate parameters of cochlear reserve - WRSmax (ρ = 0.56) and postoperative BCPTA4 (ρ = - 0.52). PROMs confirmed high subjective benefit and displayed correlations with audiological outcomes. Age, WRSmax and postoperative BCPTA4 will serve as the basis for the AI-based prediction model presented in part II. The correlation of PROMs with audiological outcomes highlights the importance of integrating objective and subjective measures in hearing rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.