Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland
{"title":"在晚期上消化道癌症的全身治疗中,为基于epro的管理途径定义关键症状参数:一项纵向研究。","authors":"Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Establishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining critical symptom parameters for an ePRO-based management pathway during systemic treatment for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Establishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining critical symptom parameters for an ePRO-based management pathway during systemic treatment for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study.
Purpose: Establishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.
Methods: Patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.
Results: Of 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.
Conclusion: In this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.
期刊介绍:
Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences.
Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership.
This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.