{"title":"某大型综合医院门诊患者使用电子病历警报系统筛查丙型肝炎病毒的专家差异","authors":"Cheng-Kuan Lin, Yu-Sen Peng, Chi-Yu Yang","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0333940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses variations in physician engagement across different specialties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2022 to April 2023, outpatients aged 45-79 years, with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease, who did not have anti-HCV data in their EMR were identified. A pop-up alert prompted physicians to either order anti-HCV testing or refer patients for a health check-up. The frequency of alerts, physician response rates, blood test completion rates, and HCV seropositivity were analyzed by specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 85,320 alerts generated, 61.4% elicited a physician response. Internal Medicine clinics had significantly higher response rates than non-Internal Medicine clinics (77.5% versus 44.6%, P < 0.01). Among patients with physician responses, 30.9% completed the study, with markedly higher completion when blood tests were directly ordered compared to referrals (88.4% versus 7.2%, P < 0.01). The monthly number of screenings increased tenfold after the system was implemented. Overall, 22,377 patients (26.2%) were screened, and 485 (2.17%) were seropositive. One-fourth of seropositive cases were identified in non-Internal Medicine clinics, where the positivity rate was higher (2.7% versus 2.04%, P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term use of the EMR alert system increased HCV detection among outpatients. The default test orders in the EMR improved completion rates more than referrals to a health check-up. There were differences in physician engagement and seropositive case detection among specialties. Targeted interventions, particularly among specialties with lower engagement, are necessary to improve the success of HCV screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0333940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Kuan Lin, Yu-Sen Peng, Chi-Yu Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0333940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses variations in physician engagement across different specialties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2022 to April 2023, outpatients aged 45-79 years, with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease, who did not have anti-HCV data in their EMR were identified. A pop-up alert prompted physicians to either order anti-HCV testing or refer patients for a health check-up. The frequency of alerts, physician response rates, blood test completion rates, and HCV seropositivity were analyzed by specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 85,320 alerts generated, 61.4% elicited a physician response. Internal Medicine clinics had significantly higher response rates than non-Internal Medicine clinics (77.5% versus 44.6%, P < 0.01). Among patients with physician responses, 30.9% completed the study, with markedly higher completion when blood tests were directly ordered compared to referrals (88.4% versus 7.2%, P < 0.01). The monthly number of screenings increased tenfold after the system was implemented. Overall, 22,377 patients (26.2%) were screened, and 485 (2.17%) were seropositive. One-fourth of seropositive cases were identified in non-Internal Medicine clinics, where the positivity rate was higher (2.7% versus 2.04%, P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term use of the EMR alert system increased HCV detection among outpatients. The default test orders in the EMR improved completion rates more than referrals to a health check-up. There were differences in physician engagement and seropositive case detection among specialties. Targeted interventions, particularly among specialties with lower engagement, are necessary to improve the success of HCV screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"e0333940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:在一家大型医院,一些丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者仍未得到充分诊断。电子病历(EMR)警报系统可以增加院内筛查。本研究评估门诊患者筛查的有效性,并评估不同专科医师参与的差异。方法:选取2022年12月至2023年4月期间,年龄45-79岁、患有糖尿病或慢性肾脏疾病、EMR中无抗- hcv数据的门诊患者。弹出的警报提示医生要么要求进行抗丙型肝炎病毒检测,要么让患者接受健康检查。按专业分析报警频率、医生反应率、血液检查完成率和HCV血清阳性。结果:在产生的85,320个警报中,61.4%引起了医生的回应。内科诊所的应答率明显高于非内科诊所(77.5% vs 44.6%)。结论:短期使用EMR警报系统增加了门诊患者的HCV检出率。EMR中的默认测试订单比转介到健康检查更能提高完成率。不同专科的医生敬业度和血清阳性病例检出率存在差异。有针对性的干预措施,特别是在参与程度较低的专业中,对于提高丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成功率是必要的。
Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital.
Background & objectives: Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses variations in physician engagement across different specialties.
Methods: From December 2022 to April 2023, outpatients aged 45-79 years, with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease, who did not have anti-HCV data in their EMR were identified. A pop-up alert prompted physicians to either order anti-HCV testing or refer patients for a health check-up. The frequency of alerts, physician response rates, blood test completion rates, and HCV seropositivity were analyzed by specialty.
Results: Of 85,320 alerts generated, 61.4% elicited a physician response. Internal Medicine clinics had significantly higher response rates than non-Internal Medicine clinics (77.5% versus 44.6%, P < 0.01). Among patients with physician responses, 30.9% completed the study, with markedly higher completion when blood tests were directly ordered compared to referrals (88.4% versus 7.2%, P < 0.01). The monthly number of screenings increased tenfold after the system was implemented. Overall, 22,377 patients (26.2%) were screened, and 485 (2.17%) were seropositive. One-fourth of seropositive cases were identified in non-Internal Medicine clinics, where the positivity rate was higher (2.7% versus 2.04%, P = 0.01).
Conclusions: Short-term use of the EMR alert system increased HCV detection among outpatients. The default test orders in the EMR improved completion rates more than referrals to a health check-up. There were differences in physician engagement and seropositive case detection among specialties. Targeted interventions, particularly among specialties with lower engagement, are necessary to improve the success of HCV screening.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage