三联抗血小板(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑)和改良双抗血小板(阿司匹林和低剂量普拉格雷)治疗在接受支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的高血小板反应性患者中的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seung Pil Ban, O-Ki Kwon, Young Deok Kim, Hwan Seok Shim, Seung Bin Sung, Jae Seung Bang, Si Un Lee, Sang Hyo Lee, Tae Won Choi, Youngmi Park
{"title":"三联抗血小板(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑)和改良双抗血小板(阿司匹林和低剂量普拉格雷)治疗在接受支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的高血小板反应性患者中的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。","authors":"Seung Pil Ban, O-Ki Kwon, Young Deok Kim, Hwan Seok Shim, Seung Bin Sung, Jae Seung Bang, Si Un Lee, Sang Hyo Lee, Tae Won Choi, Youngmi Park","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) remains unknown in neurointerventional treatment. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with HTPR undergoing stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Participants with HTPR were randomly assigned (1:1) to the triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT, addition of cilostazol) or modified dual antiplatelet therapy (MDAT, switched from clopidogrel to low-dose prasugrel) group. The primary outcome was all-bleeding-events during the 90-day follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and changes in the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value throughout the follow-up period. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 172 of the 198 participants maintained initial antiplatelet therapy for 90 days. There was no significant difference in the all-bleeding-event rate between the two groups, both in the ITT population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.49-1.20]; P = .26) and the PP population (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.50-1.30]; P = .34). The thromboembolic event rate did not differ between the 2 groups in either the ITT population (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.03-3.20]; P = .34) or the PP population (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.04-4.70]; P = .48). Compared with those in the TAT group, the PRU values in the MDAT group greatly decreased over time, particularly for PRU after loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with HTPR who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, there was no significant difference between the TAT and MDAT groups regarding the risk of all bleeding events and thromboembolic events during the 90 days of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet (Aspirin, Clopidogrel, and Cilostazol) and Modified Dual Antiplatelet (Aspirin and Low-Dose Prasugrel) Therapy in Patients With High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Undergoing Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for an Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Pil Ban, O-Ki Kwon, Young Deok Kim, Hwan Seok Shim, Seung Bin Sung, Jae Seung Bang, Si Un Lee, Sang Hyo Lee, Tae Won Choi, Youngmi Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) remains unknown in neurointerventional treatment. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with HTPR undergoing stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Participants with HTPR were randomly assigned (1:1) to the triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT, addition of cilostazol) or modified dual antiplatelet therapy (MDAT, switched from clopidogrel to low-dose prasugrel) group. The primary outcome was all-bleeding-events during the 90-day follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and changes in the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value throughout the follow-up period. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 172 of the 198 participants maintained initial antiplatelet therapy for 90 days. There was no significant difference in the all-bleeding-event rate between the two groups, both in the ITT population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.49-1.20]; P = .26) and the PP population (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.50-1.30]; P = .34). The thromboembolic event rate did not differ between the 2 groups in either the ITT population (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.03-3.20]; P = .34) or the PP population (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.04-4.70]; P = .48). Compared with those in the TAT group, the PRU values in the MDAT group greatly decreased over time, particularly for PRU after loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with HTPR who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, there was no significant difference between the TAT and MDAT groups regarding the risk of all bleeding events and thromboembolic events during the 90 days of follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003791\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在神经介入治疗中,改良抗血小板疗法对高治疗期血小板反应性(HTPR)患者的疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较两种不同的改良抗血小板疗法在HTPR患者接受支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。HTPR患者被随机(1:1)分配到三联抗血小板治疗组(TAT,加西洛他唑)或改良双抗血小板治疗组(MDAT,从氯吡格雷切换到低剂量普拉格雷)。主要终点是90天随访期间的所有出血事件。次要结局是血栓栓塞事件和P2Y12反应单位(PRU)值在整个随访期间的变化。进行意向治疗(ITT)和方案分析(PP)。结果:198名参与者中,总共有172人维持初始抗血小板治疗90天。两组之间的全出血事件发生率均无显著差异,ITT人群(危险比[HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.49-1.20]; P = 0.26)和PP人群(危险比[HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.50-1.30]; P = 0.34)。ITT组(HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.03-3.20]; P = 0.34)和PP组(HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.04-4.70]; P = 0.48)的血栓栓塞事件发生率在两组之间均无差异。与TAT组相比,MDAT组的PRU值随着时间的推移而显著降低,尤其是加载后的PRU。结论:在接受支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的HTPR患者中,TAT组和MDAT组在90天的随访期间,所有出血事件和血栓栓塞事件的风险均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet (Aspirin, Clopidogrel, and Cilostazol) and Modified Dual Antiplatelet (Aspirin and Low-Dose Prasugrel) Therapy in Patients With High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Undergoing Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for an Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background and objectives: Modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) remains unknown in neurointerventional treatment. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different modified antiplatelet therapies in patients with HTPR undergoing stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Participants with HTPR were randomly assigned (1:1) to the triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT, addition of cilostazol) or modified dual antiplatelet therapy (MDAT, switched from clopidogrel to low-dose prasugrel) group. The primary outcome was all-bleeding-events during the 90-day follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and changes in the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value throughout the follow-up period. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed.

Results: In total, 172 of the 198 participants maintained initial antiplatelet therapy for 90 days. There was no significant difference in the all-bleeding-event rate between the two groups, both in the ITT population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.49-1.20]; P = .26) and the PP population (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.50-1.30]; P = .34). The thromboembolic event rate did not differ between the 2 groups in either the ITT population (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.03-3.20]; P = .34) or the PP population (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.04-4.70]; P = .48). Compared with those in the TAT group, the PRU values in the MDAT group greatly decreased over time, particularly for PRU after loading.

Conclusion: Among patients with HTPR who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, there was no significant difference between the TAT and MDAT groups regarding the risk of all bleeding events and thromboembolic events during the 90 days of follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信