Ja Eun Lee, Kwan Young Hong, Chisong Chung, Jeong-Jin Min
{"title":"模拟气管插管时床高对喉镜力和操作人员工效学的影响:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Ja Eun Lee, Kwan Young Hong, Chisong Chung, Jeong-Jin Min","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0333104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Excessive force during laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation can result in injury to airway soft tissues and hemodynamic stress responses. In this randomized controlled trial on simulated intubation, we aimed to evaluate the effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics. This study was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry (KCT0006948).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty operators with varying levels of experience were enrolled to intubate an airway mannequin at two different bed heights- anterior superior iliac spine (level A) and xyphoid process (level X) of each operator-in a randomized sequence. The laryngoscopy force measured with a Pliance® pressure sensor attached to the surface of the Macintosh laryngoscopy blade, intubation characteristics, and ergonomic score based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool were compared between the two bed heights (level A vs. X).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak and impulse laryngoscopy forces were significantly lower at xyphoid (level X) compared to the lower bed height (level A) (peak force: 36.06 ± 9.77 N vs. 33.74 ± 8.69 N, P = 0.049; impulse force: 251.82 ± 106.06 N vs. 224.18 ± 86.48, P = 0.005). Laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade) and subjective comfort were also better at level X (P = 0.0024 and P < 0.001, respectively). The ergonomic score was higher at the lower bed height (level A, P < 0.001), indicating a more strenuous work posture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bed height at xyphoid level reduced laryngoscopy force while improving laryngeal view and ergonomic comfort compared to ASIS level. Adjusting the bed height before endotracheal intubation can improve the operating environment, which in turn may contribute to safety of both patient and operator.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0333104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics during simulated endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Ja Eun Lee, Kwan Young Hong, Chisong Chung, Jeong-Jin Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0333104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Excessive force during laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation can result in injury to airway soft tissues and hemodynamic stress responses. In this randomized controlled trial on simulated intubation, we aimed to evaluate the effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics. This study was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry (KCT0006948).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty operators with varying levels of experience were enrolled to intubate an airway mannequin at two different bed heights- anterior superior iliac spine (level A) and xyphoid process (level X) of each operator-in a randomized sequence. The laryngoscopy force measured with a Pliance® pressure sensor attached to the surface of the Macintosh laryngoscopy blade, intubation characteristics, and ergonomic score based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool were compared between the two bed heights (level A vs. X).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak and impulse laryngoscopy forces were significantly lower at xyphoid (level X) compared to the lower bed height (level A) (peak force: 36.06 ± 9.77 N vs. 33.74 ± 8.69 N, P = 0.049; impulse force: 251.82 ± 106.06 N vs. 224.18 ± 86.48, P = 0.005). Laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade) and subjective comfort were also better at level X (P = 0.0024 and P < 0.001, respectively). The ergonomic score was higher at the lower bed height (level A, P < 0.001), indicating a more strenuous work posture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bed height at xyphoid level reduced laryngoscopy force while improving laryngeal view and ergonomic comfort compared to ASIS level. Adjusting the bed height before endotracheal intubation can improve the operating environment, which in turn may contribute to safety of both patient and operator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"e0333104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:气管插管喉镜检查时用力过大会导致气道软组织损伤和血流动力学应激反应。在这项模拟插管的随机对照试验中,我们旨在评估床高度对喉镜检查力和操作人员工效学的影响。本研究已在临床研究信息服务(CRIS)注册中心注册(KCT0006948)。方法:50名不同经验水平的操作人员按随机顺序在两个不同的床高度(髂前上棘(A级)和棘突(X级))对气道假人进行插管。使用附着在Macintosh喉镜刀片表面的plance®压力传感器测量喉镜力、插管特性和基于快速全身评估工具的人体工程学评分在两种床高度(a级与X级)之间进行比较。结果:骨突(X水平)的喉镜峰值力和冲激力明显低于下床高度(A水平)(峰值力:36.06±9.77 N比33.74±8.69 N, P = 0.049;冲激力:251.82±106.06 N比224.18±86.48,P = 0.005)。结论:与ASIS水平相比,舌骨水平的床高降低了喉镜检查力,同时改善了喉镜检查视野和人体工程学舒适度。气管插管前调整床高可以改善手术环境,有利于患者和操作人员的安全。
Effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics during simulated endotracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study.
Purpose: Excessive force during laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation can result in injury to airway soft tissues and hemodynamic stress responses. In this randomized controlled trial on simulated intubation, we aimed to evaluate the effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics. This study was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry (KCT0006948).
Methods: Fifty operators with varying levels of experience were enrolled to intubate an airway mannequin at two different bed heights- anterior superior iliac spine (level A) and xyphoid process (level X) of each operator-in a randomized sequence. The laryngoscopy force measured with a Pliance® pressure sensor attached to the surface of the Macintosh laryngoscopy blade, intubation characteristics, and ergonomic score based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool were compared between the two bed heights (level A vs. X).
Results: Peak and impulse laryngoscopy forces were significantly lower at xyphoid (level X) compared to the lower bed height (level A) (peak force: 36.06 ± 9.77 N vs. 33.74 ± 8.69 N, P = 0.049; impulse force: 251.82 ± 106.06 N vs. 224.18 ± 86.48, P = 0.005). Laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade) and subjective comfort were also better at level X (P = 0.0024 and P < 0.001, respectively). The ergonomic score was higher at the lower bed height (level A, P < 0.001), indicating a more strenuous work posture.
Conclusion: Bed height at xyphoid level reduced laryngoscopy force while improving laryngeal view and ergonomic comfort compared to ASIS level. Adjusting the bed height before endotracheal intubation can improve the operating environment, which in turn may contribute to safety of both patient and operator.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage