Hyunmin Ahn, Jae Lim Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-Im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo
{"title":"“逐步扩展治疗(SET)方案”对比强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍的“Pro Re Nata方案”。","authors":"Hyunmin Ahn, Jae Lim Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-Im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy of a Stepwise Extension Treatment (SET) protocol and a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with warm compresses for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, comparative study PARTICIPANTS: Participants with meibomian gland expressibility (MGE) or meibum quality (MQ) grade 2 or higher.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants initially received four IPL sessions at 4-week intervals. In the SET group, intervals were extended or shortened by 2 weeks based on clinical response. In the PRN group, retreatment was performed only when predefined criteria were met. Retreatment was indicated if the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was ≥ 23 or increased from the prior visit, along with MGE or MQ ≥ 2. A linear mixed model was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were the longitudinal changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), and meibum quality (MQ). The total number of IPL sessions administered from baseline to 24 months was assessed as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 412 participants, 308 (74.8 %) completed the study. Mean changes in OSDI, MGE, and MQ from baseline to 24 months were -16.0, -0.8, and -0.9 in the SET group and -15.3, -0.7, and -0.8 in the PRN group, respectively (all P > 0.05). In patients with baseline MGE or MQ grade ≤ 2, both protocols effectively reduced scores to below 1.5. In patients with MGE grade 3, the SET group demonstrated greater improvement (P < 0.01), and episodic exacerbations were observed in the PRN group. The mean number of IPL sessions over 24 months was 14.8 ± 4.2 [median 13.0] in the SET group and 10.0 ± 6.4 [median 8.0] in the PRN group (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both SET and PRN regimens led to symptomatic and functional improvement in MGD. Patients with mild-to-moderate MGD responded well to either regimen. In severe MGD, the SET protocol may provide more stable long-term control, suggesting the importance of individualized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Stepwise Extension Treatment (SET) Protocol\\\" Versus \\\"Pro Re Nata Regimen\\\" of Intense Pulsed Light for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Hyunmin Ahn, Jae Lim Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Tae-Im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy of a Stepwise Extension Treatment (SET) protocol and a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with warm compresses for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, comparative study PARTICIPANTS: Participants with meibomian gland expressibility (MGE) or meibum quality (MQ) grade 2 or higher.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants initially received four IPL sessions at 4-week intervals. In the SET group, intervals were extended or shortened by 2 weeks based on clinical response. In the PRN group, retreatment was performed only when predefined criteria were met. Retreatment was indicated if the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was ≥ 23 or increased from the prior visit, along with MGE or MQ ≥ 2. A linear mixed model was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were the longitudinal changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), and meibum quality (MQ). The total number of IPL sessions administered from baseline to 24 months was assessed as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 412 participants, 308 (74.8 %) completed the study. Mean changes in OSDI, MGE, and MQ from baseline to 24 months were -16.0, -0.8, and -0.9 in the SET group and -15.3, -0.7, and -0.8 in the PRN group, respectively (all P > 0.05). In patients with baseline MGE or MQ grade ≤ 2, both protocols effectively reduced scores to below 1.5. In patients with MGE grade 3, the SET group demonstrated greater improvement (P < 0.01), and episodic exacerbations were observed in the PRN group. The mean number of IPL sessions over 24 months was 14.8 ± 4.2 [median 13.0] in the SET group and 10.0 ± 6.4 [median 8.0] in the PRN group (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both SET and PRN regimens led to symptomatic and functional improvement in MGD. Patients with mild-to-moderate MGD responded well to either regimen. In severe MGD, the SET protocol may provide more stable long-term control, suggesting the importance of individualized treatment approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.09.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较逐步延伸治疗(SET)方案和Pro Re Nata (PRN)方案的强脉冲光(IPL)热敷治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的疗效。设计:一项前瞻性比较研究参与者:睑板腺表达性(MGE)或睑板质量(MQ) 2级或以上的参与者。方法:所有参与者最初每隔4周接受4次IPL治疗。SET组根据临床反应延长或缩短治疗间隔2周。在PRN组中,仅在满足预定义标准时才进行再治疗。如果眼表疾病指数(OSDI)≥23或较前次就诊增加,且MGE或MQ≥2,则需要重新治疗。采用线性混合模型进行分析。主要转归指标:主要转归指标为眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、睑板腺表达性(MGE)和睑板质量(MQ)的纵向变化。从基线到24个月,IPL治疗的总次数作为次要结果进行评估。结果:在412名参与者中,308名(74.8%)完成了研究。从基线到24个月,SET组OSDI、MGE和MQ的平均变化分别为-16.0、-0.8和-0.9,PRN组为-15.3、-0.7和-0.8(均P < 0.05)。在基线MGE或MQ等级≤2的患者中,两种方案都有效地将评分降至1.5以下。在MGE 3级患者中,SET组表现出更大的改善(P < 0.01), PRN组出现了发作性加重。SET组24个月内IPL的平均次数为14.8±4.2次(中位数13.0),PRN组为10.0±6.4次(中位数8.0)(P < 0.01)。结论:SET和PRN方案均可改善MGD的症状和功能。轻度至中度MGD患者对两种方案均有良好反应。在严重的MGD中,SET方案可能提供更稳定的长期控制,这表明个性化治疗方法的重要性。
"Stepwise Extension Treatment (SET) Protocol" Versus "Pro Re Nata Regimen" of Intense Pulsed Light for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of a Stepwise Extension Treatment (SET) protocol and a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with warm compresses for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
Design: A prospective, comparative study PARTICIPANTS: Participants with meibomian gland expressibility (MGE) or meibum quality (MQ) grade 2 or higher.
Methods: All participants initially received four IPL sessions at 4-week intervals. In the SET group, intervals were extended or shortened by 2 weeks based on clinical response. In the PRN group, retreatment was performed only when predefined criteria were met. Retreatment was indicated if the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was ≥ 23 or increased from the prior visit, along with MGE or MQ ≥ 2. A linear mixed model was used for analysis.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were the longitudinal changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), and meibum quality (MQ). The total number of IPL sessions administered from baseline to 24 months was assessed as a secondary outcome.
Results: Among 412 participants, 308 (74.8 %) completed the study. Mean changes in OSDI, MGE, and MQ from baseline to 24 months were -16.0, -0.8, and -0.9 in the SET group and -15.3, -0.7, and -0.8 in the PRN group, respectively (all P > 0.05). In patients with baseline MGE or MQ grade ≤ 2, both protocols effectively reduced scores to below 1.5. In patients with MGE grade 3, the SET group demonstrated greater improvement (P < 0.01), and episodic exacerbations were observed in the PRN group. The mean number of IPL sessions over 24 months was 14.8 ± 4.2 [median 13.0] in the SET group and 10.0 ± 6.4 [median 8.0] in the PRN group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Both SET and PRN regimens led to symptomatic and functional improvement in MGD. Patients with mild-to-moderate MGD responded well to either regimen. In severe MGD, the SET protocol may provide more stable long-term control, suggesting the importance of individualized treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.