评估接受抗凝和抗肿瘤药物治疗的癌症患者的ddi:一项关注治疗疗效和安全性的范围综述。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Melina Yerolatsite, Nikolaos Tsoukalas, Grigoris Gerotziafas, Costas Pappas, Nanteznta Torounidou, Eleftheria Lefkou, Davide Mauri, Alexandros D Tselepis, Despoina Pantazi
{"title":"评估接受抗凝和抗肿瘤药物治疗的癌症患者的ddi:一项关注治疗疗效和安全性的范围综述。","authors":"Melina Yerolatsite, Nikolaos Tsoukalas, Grigoris Gerotziafas, Costas Pappas, Nanteznta Torounidou, Eleftheria Lefkou, Davide Mauri, Alexandros D Tselepis, Despoina Pantazi","doi":"10.1007/s12032-025-03074-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has become increasingly important due to its prevalence and impact on patient outcomes. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is significantly increased during cancer progression and cancer therapy, highlighting the urgent need for effective anticoagulant strategies. There are several categories of anticoagulants, the most important being low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Investigating drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of these anticoagulants with oncology drugs is crucial to ensure effective and safe treatment options for cancer patients. Using a comprehensive search strategy, the PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify studies reporting DDIs between anticoagulants and antineoplastic drugs through December 2023. Four studies met the inclusion criteria and included 299 patients, mostly women, with different comorbidities and treatment regimens for anti-thrombotic and anti-neoplastic therapy. Studies have reported varying degrees of severity of DDIs, ranging from no interaction to contraindicated interactions, which affect the efficacy and safety results of the treatment, such as bleeding and thrombotic events. Compared to DOACs, LMWHs does not interact with chemotherapy drugs. While LMWHs is preferred due to its predictable response and minimal toxicity, DOACs are a more appropriate option despite concerns regarding their interaction with oncological drugs. Understanding and managing DDIs between anticoagulant medications and oncology drugs is critical to optimising treatment outcomes for cancer patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical implications of these interactions and guide therapeutic decisions in this complex patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":"42 11","pages":"511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating DDIs in cancer patients receiving anticoagulants and antineoplastics: a scoping review focusing on therapeutic efficacy and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Melina Yerolatsite, Nikolaos Tsoukalas, Grigoris Gerotziafas, Costas Pappas, Nanteznta Torounidou, Eleftheria Lefkou, Davide Mauri, Alexandros D Tselepis, Despoina Pantazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12032-025-03074-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has become increasingly important due to its prevalence and impact on patient outcomes. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is significantly increased during cancer progression and cancer therapy, highlighting the urgent need for effective anticoagulant strategies. There are several categories of anticoagulants, the most important being low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Investigating drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of these anticoagulants with oncology drugs is crucial to ensure effective and safe treatment options for cancer patients. Using a comprehensive search strategy, the PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify studies reporting DDIs between anticoagulants and antineoplastic drugs through December 2023. Four studies met the inclusion criteria and included 299 patients, mostly women, with different comorbidities and treatment regimens for anti-thrombotic and anti-neoplastic therapy. Studies have reported varying degrees of severity of DDIs, ranging from no interaction to contraindicated interactions, which affect the efficacy and safety results of the treatment, such as bleeding and thrombotic events. Compared to DOACs, LMWHs does not interact with chemotherapy drugs. While LMWHs is preferred due to its predictable response and minimal toxicity, DOACs are a more appropriate option despite concerns regarding their interaction with oncological drugs. Understanding and managing DDIs between anticoagulant medications and oncology drugs is critical to optimising treatment outcomes for cancer patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical implications of these interactions and guide therapeutic decisions in this complex patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"42 11\",\"pages\":\"511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-025-03074-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-025-03074-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症相关性血栓形成(CAT)由于其患病率和对患者预后的影响而变得越来越重要。在癌症进展和癌症治疗过程中,静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险显著增加,这突出了对有效抗凝策略的迫切需要。抗凝剂有几类,最重要的是低分子肝素(LMWHs)和直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)。研究这些抗凝剂与肿瘤药物的药物相互作用(ddi)对于确保癌症患者的有效和安全的治疗选择至关重要。使用综合搜索策略,PubMed和Embase数据库用于识别截至2023年12月报告抗凝血剂和抗肿瘤药物之间ddi的研究。四项研究符合纳入标准,纳入了299例患者,其中大多数为女性,具有不同的合并症和抗血栓和抗肿瘤治疗方案。研究报告了不同程度的ddi严重程度,从无相互作用到禁忌相互作用,影响治疗的有效性和安全性结果,如出血和血栓事件。与DOACs相比,LMWHs不与化疗药物相互作用。低分子肝细胞是首选,因为其可预测的反应和最小的毒性,doac是更合适的选择,尽管担心它们与肿瘤药物的相互作用。了解和管理抗凝药物和肿瘤药物之间的ddi对于优化癌症患者的治疗结果至关重要。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些相互作用的临床意义,并指导这种复杂患者群体的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating DDIs in cancer patients receiving anticoagulants and antineoplastics: a scoping review focusing on therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has become increasingly important due to its prevalence and impact on patient outcomes. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is significantly increased during cancer progression and cancer therapy, highlighting the urgent need for effective anticoagulant strategies. There are several categories of anticoagulants, the most important being low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Investigating drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of these anticoagulants with oncology drugs is crucial to ensure effective and safe treatment options for cancer patients. Using a comprehensive search strategy, the PubMed and Embase databases were used to identify studies reporting DDIs between anticoagulants and antineoplastic drugs through December 2023. Four studies met the inclusion criteria and included 299 patients, mostly women, with different comorbidities and treatment regimens for anti-thrombotic and anti-neoplastic therapy. Studies have reported varying degrees of severity of DDIs, ranging from no interaction to contraindicated interactions, which affect the efficacy and safety results of the treatment, such as bleeding and thrombotic events. Compared to DOACs, LMWHs does not interact with chemotherapy drugs. While LMWHs is preferred due to its predictable response and minimal toxicity, DOACs are a more appropriate option despite concerns regarding their interaction with oncological drugs. Understanding and managing DDIs between anticoagulant medications and oncology drugs is critical to optimising treatment outcomes for cancer patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical implications of these interactions and guide therapeutic decisions in this complex patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信