文献中的颅骨重建:CiteSpace可视化文献计量学分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jake Barsch, Erion Sulaj, John L Kilgallon, Robert Kamil, Nitesh V Patel, Ira M Goldstein
{"title":"文献中的颅骨重建:CiteSpace可视化文献计量学分析。","authors":"Jake Barsch, Erion Sulaj, John L Kilgallon, Robert Kamil, Nitesh V Patel, Ira M Goldstein","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03878-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cranioplasty (CP) research has shown that the material used for its bone flap formation is not standardized, with several viable options. The aim of this study was to explore the development of research in cranioplasty from a bibliometric perspective, with a focus on material choice, to elucidate trends in CP literature over time. Original studies and review articles on cranioplasty material related research were obtained from the Scopus database from 2014 to 2024. R package \"bibliometrix\" was used to summarize main findings, examine the occurrence of top keywords, and visualize collaboration networks between countries. VOSviewer software was applied to conduct both co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses, with CiteSpace used to identify the references and keywords with the strongest citation bursts. A total of 933 publications on cranioplasty material were included. An analysis of publication titles demonstrated an increase in CP for traumatic brain injury (TBI) post-2010 along with the growth of custom implants (i.e., \"patient-specific\"). Early citation bursts focused on the application of various materials, while later keywords concerned surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Several authors had significant bursts of contribution, and the United States was the largest contributor to the existing body of literature. This bibliometric study elucidated keyword trends as they relate to CP and material selection. It mapped a fundamental knowledge structure consisting of countries, institutions, authors, journals, and articles in the research field of cranioplasty material over the past ten years. The results provide a comprehensive perspective about the wider landscape of this research area.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cranial reconstruction in the literature: A CiteSpace visualized bibliometric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jake Barsch, Erion Sulaj, John L Kilgallon, Robert Kamil, Nitesh V Patel, Ira M Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03878-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cranioplasty (CP) research has shown that the material used for its bone flap formation is not standardized, with several viable options. The aim of this study was to explore the development of research in cranioplasty from a bibliometric perspective, with a focus on material choice, to elucidate trends in CP literature over time. Original studies and review articles on cranioplasty material related research were obtained from the Scopus database from 2014 to 2024. R package \\\"bibliometrix\\\" was used to summarize main findings, examine the occurrence of top keywords, and visualize collaboration networks between countries. VOSviewer software was applied to conduct both co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses, with CiteSpace used to identify the references and keywords with the strongest citation bursts. A total of 933 publications on cranioplasty material were included. An analysis of publication titles demonstrated an increase in CP for traumatic brain injury (TBI) post-2010 along with the growth of custom implants (i.e., \\\"patient-specific\\\"). Early citation bursts focused on the application of various materials, while later keywords concerned surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Several authors had significant bursts of contribution, and the United States was the largest contributor to the existing body of literature. This bibliometric study elucidated keyword trends as they relate to CP and material selection. It mapped a fundamental knowledge structure consisting of countries, institutions, authors, journals, and articles in the research field of cranioplasty material over the past ten years. The results provide a comprehensive perspective about the wider landscape of this research area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03878-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03878-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅成形术(CP)的研究表明,用于骨瓣形成的材料是不标准化的,有几种可行的选择。本研究的目的是从文献计量学的角度探讨颅骨成形术研究的发展,重点是材料选择,以阐明CP文献随时间的发展趋势。2014 - 2024年Scopus数据库中关于颅骨成形术材料相关研究的原始研究和综述文章。使用R软件包“bibliometrix”来总结主要发现,检查热门关键词的出现情况,并将国家之间的协作网络可视化。使用VOSviewer软件进行合著和共现分析,使用CiteSpace软件识别被引频次最强的参考文献和关键词。共纳入933份关于颅骨成形术材料的出版物。对出版物标题的分析表明,随着定制植入物(即“患者特异性”)的增长,2010年后创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的CP增加。早期的引文集中于各种材料的应用,而后期的关键词则涉及手术并发症和临床结果。几位作者都有重大的贡献,美国是现存文学体系的最大贡献者。这项文献计量学研究阐明了关键词趋势,因为它们与CP和材料选择有关。它绘制了一个基本的知识结构,包括国家、机构、作者、期刊和文章在过去十年颅骨成形术材料的研究领域。研究结果为这一研究领域提供了一个全面的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cranial reconstruction in the literature: A CiteSpace visualized bibliometric analysis.

Cranioplasty (CP) research has shown that the material used for its bone flap formation is not standardized, with several viable options. The aim of this study was to explore the development of research in cranioplasty from a bibliometric perspective, with a focus on material choice, to elucidate trends in CP literature over time. Original studies and review articles on cranioplasty material related research were obtained from the Scopus database from 2014 to 2024. R package "bibliometrix" was used to summarize main findings, examine the occurrence of top keywords, and visualize collaboration networks between countries. VOSviewer software was applied to conduct both co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses, with CiteSpace used to identify the references and keywords with the strongest citation bursts. A total of 933 publications on cranioplasty material were included. An analysis of publication titles demonstrated an increase in CP for traumatic brain injury (TBI) post-2010 along with the growth of custom implants (i.e., "patient-specific"). Early citation bursts focused on the application of various materials, while later keywords concerned surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Several authors had significant bursts of contribution, and the United States was the largest contributor to the existing body of literature. This bibliometric study elucidated keyword trends as they relate to CP and material selection. It mapped a fundamental knowledge structure consisting of countries, institutions, authors, journals, and articles in the research field of cranioplasty material over the past ten years. The results provide a comprehensive perspective about the wider landscape of this research area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信