577 nm二极管激光与1064 nm Nd: YAG激光治疗炎性寻常痤疮的疗效和安全性比较:一项裂面随机研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Essamelden M Mohamed, Hazem L Abdel-Aleem, Ghadeer M H Elazab, Mahmoud A Rageh
{"title":"577 nm二极管激光与1064 nm Nd: YAG激光治疗炎性寻常痤疮的疗效和安全性比较:一项裂面随机研究。","authors":"Essamelden M Mohamed, Hazem L Abdel-Aleem, Ghadeer M H Elazab, Mahmoud A Rageh","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04654-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder with physical and psychosocial impact. Laser therapies offer targeted, non-pharmacologic treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the 577-nm diode laser versus the 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser in treating inflammatory acne vulgaris. In this prospective, split-face randomized trial, 52 patients underwent three sessions of laser treatment at two-week intervals. One side of the face was treated with a 577-nm diode laser and the other with a 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser. Outcomes included inflammatory lesion counts, Acne Severity Index (ASI), patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Both lasers significantly reduced inflammatory lesions (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Excellent ASI response was observed in 26.9% (diode) and 28.8% (Nd: YAG) treated sides. Satisfaction scores were comparable (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.59). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. The 577-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd: YAG lasers are equally effective and well-tolerated for inflammatory acne, offering safe alternatives to conventional therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Essamelden M Mohamed, Hazem L Abdel-Aleem, Ghadeer M H Elazab, Mahmoud A Rageh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04654-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder with physical and psychosocial impact. Laser therapies offer targeted, non-pharmacologic treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the 577-nm diode laser versus the 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser in treating inflammatory acne vulgaris. In this prospective, split-face randomized trial, 52 patients underwent three sessions of laser treatment at two-week intervals. One side of the face was treated with a 577-nm diode laser and the other with a 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser. Outcomes included inflammatory lesion counts, Acne Severity Index (ASI), patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Both lasers significantly reduced inflammatory lesions (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Excellent ASI response was observed in 26.9% (diode) and 28.8% (Nd: YAG) treated sides. Satisfaction scores were comparable (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.59). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. The 577-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd: YAG lasers are equally effective and well-tolerated for inflammatory acne, offering safe alternatives to conventional therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04654-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04654-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寻常痤疮是一种常见的炎症性皮肤病,具有身体和社会心理影响。激光治疗提供有针对性的非药物治疗选择。我们的目的是比较577 nm二极管激光与1064 nm Nd: YAG激光治疗炎性寻常痤疮的疗效和安全性。在这项前瞻性裂脸随机试验中,52名患者每隔两周接受三次激光治疗。一侧面部用577 nm二极管激光治疗,另一侧用1064 nm Nd: YAG激光治疗。结果包括炎症病变计数、痤疮严重程度指数(ASI)、患者满意度和不良反应。两种激光均可显著减少炎性病变(p < 0.05)。在26.9%(二极管)和28.8% (Nd: YAG)处理侧观察到极好的ASI反应。满意度评分具有可比性(2.5±0.6比2.6±0.5;p = 0.59)。不良事件轻微且短暂,无严重并发症。577纳米二极管和1064纳米Nd: YAG激光器对炎性痤疮同样有效且耐受性良好,为传统疗法提供了安全的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study.

Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study.

Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study.

Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder with physical and psychosocial impact. Laser therapies offer targeted, non-pharmacologic treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the 577-nm diode laser versus the 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser in treating inflammatory acne vulgaris. In this prospective, split-face randomized trial, 52 patients underwent three sessions of laser treatment at two-week intervals. One side of the face was treated with a 577-nm diode laser and the other with a 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser. Outcomes included inflammatory lesion counts, Acne Severity Index (ASI), patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Both lasers significantly reduced inflammatory lesions (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Excellent ASI response was observed in 26.9% (diode) and 28.8% (Nd: YAG) treated sides. Satisfaction scores were comparable (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.59). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. The 577-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd: YAG lasers are equally effective and well-tolerated for inflammatory acne, offering safe alternatives to conventional therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信