强脉冲光、发光二极管和羟氯喹治疗酒渣鼻的临床观察。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Chengyu Zhang, LiXin Song
{"title":"强脉冲光、发光二极管和羟氯喹治疗酒渣鼻的临床观察。","authors":"Chengyu Zhang, LiXin Song","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04696-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition lacking specific treatment. This study investigates the efficacy of various photoelectric therapies in treating rosacea. 90 rosacea patients who visited the dermatology outpatient clinic of the hospital from August 2022 to November 2023 were analyzed (retrospective registration 20240425). The patients were categorized into three groups based on different treatment methods: the control group received oral hydroxychloroquine sulfate and topical recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor; observation group 1 underwent intense pulsed light therapy in addition to the control group's treatment; observation group 2 received light-emitting diode therapy on top of the control group's regimen. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by physicians' subjective evaluation and patients' pruritus symptoms. The effective rates of observation group 1, observation group 2, and the control group were 73.3%, 66.7%, and 40%, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between observation group 1 and observation group 2 (P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant adverse reactions in any of the three groups. The comparison between observation group 1 and observation group 2 revealed that the two combined treatment methods achieved similar and positive therapeutic effects across various clinical manifestations. The effectiveness of both observation groups was found to be superior to that of drug therapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intense pulsed Light, Light-Emitting Diode, and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of rosacea: A clinical observation.\",\"authors\":\"Chengyu Zhang, LiXin Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04696-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition lacking specific treatment. This study investigates the efficacy of various photoelectric therapies in treating rosacea. 90 rosacea patients who visited the dermatology outpatient clinic of the hospital from August 2022 to November 2023 were analyzed (retrospective registration 20240425). The patients were categorized into three groups based on different treatment methods: the control group received oral hydroxychloroquine sulfate and topical recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor; observation group 1 underwent intense pulsed light therapy in addition to the control group's treatment; observation group 2 received light-emitting diode therapy on top of the control group's regimen. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by physicians' subjective evaluation and patients' pruritus symptoms. The effective rates of observation group 1, observation group 2, and the control group were 73.3%, 66.7%, and 40%, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between observation group 1 and observation group 2 (P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant adverse reactions in any of the three groups. The comparison between observation group 1 and observation group 2 revealed that the two combined treatment methods achieved similar and positive therapeutic effects across various clinical manifestations. The effectiveness of both observation groups was found to be superior to that of drug therapy alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04696-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04696-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒渣鼻是一种常见的慢性炎症性皮肤病,缺乏特异性治疗。本研究探讨各种光电疗法治疗酒渣鼻的疗效。对2022年8月至2023年11月在该院皮肤科门诊就诊的90例酒渣鼻患者进行分析(回顾性登记20240425例)。根据治疗方法的不同,将患者分为三组:对照组口服硫酸羟氯喹和外用重组牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子;观察组1在对照组治疗的基础上进行强脉冲光治疗;观察2组患者在对照组治疗方案的基础上接受发光二极管治疗。采用医师主观评价和患者瘙痒症状评价治疗效果。观察组1、观察组2、对照组有效率分别为73.3%、66.7%、40%,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intense pulsed Light, Light-Emitting Diode, and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of rosacea: A clinical observation.

Background: Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory skin condition lacking specific treatment. This study investigates the efficacy of various photoelectric therapies in treating rosacea. 90 rosacea patients who visited the dermatology outpatient clinic of the hospital from August 2022 to November 2023 were analyzed (retrospective registration 20240425). The patients were categorized into three groups based on different treatment methods: the control group received oral hydroxychloroquine sulfate and topical recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor; observation group 1 underwent intense pulsed light therapy in addition to the control group's treatment; observation group 2 received light-emitting diode therapy on top of the control group's regimen. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by physicians' subjective evaluation and patients' pruritus symptoms. The effective rates of observation group 1, observation group 2, and the control group were 73.3%, 66.7%, and 40%, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between observation group 1 and observation group 2 (P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant adverse reactions in any of the three groups. The comparison between observation group 1 and observation group 2 revealed that the two combined treatment methods achieved similar and positive therapeutic effects across various clinical manifestations. The effectiveness of both observation groups was found to be superior to that of drug therapy alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信