Pietro Ferrara, Adriano La Vecchia, Lorenzo Losa, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Montserrat Plana, Fernando Agüero
{"title":"是否需要第二剂黄热病疫苗?再次接种疫苗后体液和细胞介导免疫的系统综述。","authors":"Pietro Ferrara, Adriano La Vecchia, Lorenzo Losa, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Montserrat Plana, Fernando Agüero","doi":"10.1093/jtm/taaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of ongoing debate about whether a single dose of the yellow fever (YF) vaccine provides lifelong protection, addressing key unanswered questions-such as the extent to which revaccination enhances humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses, and the true duration of immunity-is particularly important for protecting high-risk groups. This systematic review evaluated the immunogenicity of YF revaccination, to support evidence-based vaccination policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search in electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies that evaluated humoral or CMI responses following booster YF vaccination in both adults and children from endemic and non-endemic regions. Interventions included full-dose and fractional-dose YF vaccine boosters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies (n = 1821 participants) were included. Revaccination temporarily enhances neutralizing antibody titres, particularly in individuals with low or undetectable baseline immunity. Long-term seropositivity remained high in most cohorts. Individuals with high baseline titres showed limited humoral response, suggesting a limited boosting effect. In terms of CMI, booster generally results in minimal activation of T-cell markers compared to primary vaccination, suggesting that revaccination primarily sustains memory responses rather than inducing new activation. In individuals with low baseline immunity, it restores both T-cell and B-cell functional memories. Memory T-cell subsets remain detectable for over 10 years. Children vaccinated at ≤ 2 years and immunocompromised individuals showed marked benefits from revaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine YF revaccination appears unnecessary for most immunocompetent individuals across different age groups given durable protection conferred by a single dose. However, booster doses may benefit specific high-risk groups such as individuals vaccinated at very young ages, those with low baseline immunity or with altered immunocompetence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of travel medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is a second dose of yellow fever vaccine needed? A systematic review of humoral and cell-mediated immunity after revaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Ferrara, Adriano La Vecchia, Lorenzo Losa, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Montserrat Plana, Fernando Agüero\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jtm/taaf106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of ongoing debate about whether a single dose of the yellow fever (YF) vaccine provides lifelong protection, addressing key unanswered questions-such as the extent to which revaccination enhances humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses, and the true duration of immunity-is particularly important for protecting high-risk groups. This systematic review evaluated the immunogenicity of YF revaccination, to support evidence-based vaccination policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search in electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies that evaluated humoral or CMI responses following booster YF vaccination in both adults and children from endemic and non-endemic regions. Interventions included full-dose and fractional-dose YF vaccine boosters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies (n = 1821 participants) were included. Revaccination temporarily enhances neutralizing antibody titres, particularly in individuals with low or undetectable baseline immunity. Long-term seropositivity remained high in most cohorts. Individuals with high baseline titres showed limited humoral response, suggesting a limited boosting effect. In terms of CMI, booster generally results in minimal activation of T-cell markers compared to primary vaccination, suggesting that revaccination primarily sustains memory responses rather than inducing new activation. In individuals with low baseline immunity, it restores both T-cell and B-cell functional memories. Memory T-cell subsets remain detectable for over 10 years. Children vaccinated at ≤ 2 years and immunocompromised individuals showed marked benefits from revaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine YF revaccination appears unnecessary for most immunocompetent individuals across different age groups given durable protection conferred by a single dose. However, booster doses may benefit specific high-risk groups such as individuals vaccinated at very young ages, those with low baseline immunity or with altered immunocompetence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of travel medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of travel medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of travel medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is a second dose of yellow fever vaccine needed? A systematic review of humoral and cell-mediated immunity after revaccination.
Background: In the context of ongoing debate about whether a single dose of the yellow fever (YF) vaccine provides lifelong protection, addressing key unanswered questions-such as the extent to which revaccination enhances humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses, and the true duration of immunity-is particularly important for protecting high-risk groups. This systematic review evaluated the immunogenicity of YF revaccination, to support evidence-based vaccination policies.
Methods: A systematic search in electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies that evaluated humoral or CMI responses following booster YF vaccination in both adults and children from endemic and non-endemic regions. Interventions included full-dose and fractional-dose YF vaccine boosters.
Results: Twenty-one studies (n = 1821 participants) were included. Revaccination temporarily enhances neutralizing antibody titres, particularly in individuals with low or undetectable baseline immunity. Long-term seropositivity remained high in most cohorts. Individuals with high baseline titres showed limited humoral response, suggesting a limited boosting effect. In terms of CMI, booster generally results in minimal activation of T-cell markers compared to primary vaccination, suggesting that revaccination primarily sustains memory responses rather than inducing new activation. In individuals with low baseline immunity, it restores both T-cell and B-cell functional memories. Memory T-cell subsets remain detectable for over 10 years. Children vaccinated at ≤ 2 years and immunocompromised individuals showed marked benefits from revaccination.
Conclusions: Routine YF revaccination appears unnecessary for most immunocompetent individuals across different age groups given durable protection conferred by a single dose. However, booster doses may benefit specific high-risk groups such as individuals vaccinated at very young ages, those with low baseline immunity or with altered immunocompetence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Travel Medicine is a publication that focuses on travel medicine and its intersection with other disciplines. It publishes cutting-edge research, consensus papers, policy papers, and expert reviews. The journal is affiliated with the Asia Pacific Travel Health Society.
The journal's main areas of interest include the prevention and management of travel-associated infections, non-communicable diseases, vaccines, malaria prevention and treatment, multi-drug resistant pathogens, and surveillance on all individuals crossing international borders.
The Journal of Travel Medicine is indexed in multiple major indexing services, including Adis International Ltd., CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, Gale, Journal Watch Infectious Diseases (Online), MetaPress, National Library of Medicine, OCLC, Ovid, ProQuest, Thomson Reuters, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine.