社区药房慢性肾脏病筛查:crierface项目。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
José Espejo-Guerrero, Luis Salar-Ibáñez, Eduardo Satué-de-Velasco, Lourdes Martínez-Berganza-Asensio, Noemí Pérez-León
{"title":"社区药房慢性肾脏病筛查:crierface项目。","authors":"José Espejo-Guerrero, Luis Salar-Ibáñez, Eduardo Satué-de-Velasco, Lourdes Martínez-Berganza-Asensio, Noemí Pérez-León","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening in community pharmacies through creatinine measurement and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in patients meeting specific risk criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter observational study. People who entered participating pharmacies for any reason and met the inclusion criterion of not having a CKD diagnosis were invited to participate in the study. If they agreed, the pharmacist conducted a point-of-care blood creatinine test, and the GFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Those with a positive CKD indicator (<45 ml/min/1.73 m2) were referred to their general practitioner (GP) for evaluation. People with a GFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were not considered to have CKD. Those with a GFR between 45 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were asked to return for reassessment 1 month later. Those with a GFR 45 < ml/min/1.73 m2 were then considered CKD-positive and referred to the GP. All the data were recorded by the pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>One hundred and forty-one community pharmacies from 40 provinces of Spain enrolled 2116 patients. In the first analysis, 1428 (67.5%) were negative, 165 (7.8%) were positive, and 523 (24.7%) needed a second analysis. In the second analysis, 164 (7.8%) were negative, 243 (11.5%) were positive, and 116 (5.5%) did not reattend. In summary, by intention to treat, 1592 (75.2%) were negative and 408 (19.3%) tested positive and were referred to their GP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of CKD detection in community pharmacies are in line with screening in other healthcare settings, confirming they could be a reliable resource in future population-screening strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for chronic kidney disease in community pharmacy: Crierfac project.\",\"authors\":\"José Espejo-Guerrero, Luis Salar-Ibáñez, Eduardo Satué-de-Velasco, Lourdes Martínez-Berganza-Asensio, Noemí Pérez-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijpp/riaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening in community pharmacies through creatinine measurement and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in patients meeting specific risk criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter observational study. People who entered participating pharmacies for any reason and met the inclusion criterion of not having a CKD diagnosis were invited to participate in the study. If they agreed, the pharmacist conducted a point-of-care blood creatinine test, and the GFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Those with a positive CKD indicator (<45 ml/min/1.73 m2) were referred to their general practitioner (GP) for evaluation. People with a GFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were not considered to have CKD. Those with a GFR between 45 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were asked to return for reassessment 1 month later. Those with a GFR 45 < ml/min/1.73 m2 were then considered CKD-positive and referred to the GP. All the data were recorded by the pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>One hundred and forty-one community pharmacies from 40 provinces of Spain enrolled 2116 patients. In the first analysis, 1428 (67.5%) were negative, 165 (7.8%) were positive, and 523 (24.7%) needed a second analysis. In the second analysis, 164 (7.8%) were negative, 243 (11.5%) were positive, and 116 (5.5%) did not reattend. In summary, by intention to treat, 1592 (75.2%) were negative and 408 (19.3%) tested positive and were referred to their GP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of CKD detection in community pharmacies are in line with screening in other healthcare settings, confirming they could be a reliable resource in future population-screening strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过肌酐测定和肾小球滤过率(GFR)评估社区药房慢性肾病(CKD)筛查符合特定风险标准的患者的结果。方法:本研究为多中心观察性研究。任何出于任何原因进入参与药店并符合无CKD诊断纳入标准的人都被邀请参加研究。如果他们同意,药剂师进行了即时血肌酐测试,并使用CKD-EPI公式计算GFR。CKD指标呈阳性(60 ml/min/1.73 m2)的患者不认为患有CKD。GFR在45 - 60ml /min/1.73 m2之间的患者在1个月后再次接受评估。主要发现:来自西班牙40个省的141家社区药房招募了2116名患者。在第一次分析中,1428例(67.5%)为阴性,165例(7.8%)为阳性,523例(24.7%)需要第二次分析。在第二次分析中,164例(7.8%)为阴性,243例(11.5%)为阳性,116例(5.5%)未复发。总之,意向治疗中,1592例(75.2%)呈阴性,408例(19.3%)呈阳性并转介给全科医生。结论:社区药房的CKD检测结果与其他医疗机构的筛查结果一致,证实它们可以作为未来人群筛查策略的可靠资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for chronic kidney disease in community pharmacy: Crierfac project.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening in community pharmacies through creatinine measurement and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in patients meeting specific risk criteria.

Methods: This was a multicenter observational study. People who entered participating pharmacies for any reason and met the inclusion criterion of not having a CKD diagnosis were invited to participate in the study. If they agreed, the pharmacist conducted a point-of-care blood creatinine test, and the GFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Those with a positive CKD indicator (<45 ml/min/1.73 m2) were referred to their general practitioner (GP) for evaluation. People with a GFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were not considered to have CKD. Those with a GFR between 45 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were asked to return for reassessment 1 month later. Those with a GFR 45 < ml/min/1.73 m2 were then considered CKD-positive and referred to the GP. All the data were recorded by the pharmacist.

Key findings: One hundred and forty-one community pharmacies from 40 provinces of Spain enrolled 2116 patients. In the first analysis, 1428 (67.5%) were negative, 165 (7.8%) were positive, and 523 (24.7%) needed a second analysis. In the second analysis, 164 (7.8%) were negative, 243 (11.5%) were positive, and 116 (5.5%) did not reattend. In summary, by intention to treat, 1592 (75.2%) were negative and 408 (19.3%) tested positive and were referred to their GP.

Conclusions: The results of CKD detection in community pharmacies are in line with screening in other healthcare settings, confirming they could be a reliable resource in future population-screening strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信