{"title":"SAM-TB平台作为检测结核分枝杆菌耐药性与TB-Proflier、PhyResSE和Mykrobe的诊断方法的准确性:一项正面比较","authors":"Juexin Wang, Xiaoling Lai, Chuchu Wu, Jielian Wang, Yong Liao, Qiong Lei, Zhenbo Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00284-025-04530-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is essential for tuberculosis control, particularly with increasing multidrug-resistant strains. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as a supplement to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), holds great potential for resistance detection, but comparative analyses of multiple WGS tools remain limited. This study assessed four WGS-based tools-SAM-TB, TB-Profiler, Mykrobe predictor, and PhyResSE-for predicting resistance to four first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin) using 113 clinical MTB isolates from Ganzhou, China, with phenotypic DST as reference. All tools showed similar sensitivity (85.04-88.19%) and high specificity (95.69-96.31%). Several known resistance-associated mutations were identified, along with seven novel mutations absent from the WHO catalogue and thirteen of uncertain clinical significance. Discrepancies between WGS and DST occurred across all drugs, potentially due to disputed mutations, outdated databases, or limitations of phenotypic methods. These results highlight the complementary roles of WGS and phenotypic DST in drug resistance surveillance and emphasize the need for continuously updated mutation databases, including the WHO catalogue, and standardized interpretation criteria to enhance the clinical utility of WGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 12","pages":"547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of SAM-TB Platform as a Diagnostic Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Resistance Versus TB-Proflier, PhyResSE, and Mykrobe: A Head-to-Head Comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Juexin Wang, Xiaoling Lai, Chuchu Wu, Jielian Wang, Yong Liao, Qiong Lei, Zhenbo Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00284-025-04530-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is essential for tuberculosis control, particularly with increasing multidrug-resistant strains. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as a supplement to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), holds great potential for resistance detection, but comparative analyses of multiple WGS tools remain limited. This study assessed four WGS-based tools-SAM-TB, TB-Profiler, Mykrobe predictor, and PhyResSE-for predicting resistance to four first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin) using 113 clinical MTB isolates from Ganzhou, China, with phenotypic DST as reference. All tools showed similar sensitivity (85.04-88.19%) and high specificity (95.69-96.31%). Several known resistance-associated mutations were identified, along with seven novel mutations absent from the WHO catalogue and thirteen of uncertain clinical significance. Discrepancies between WGS and DST occurred across all drugs, potentially due to disputed mutations, outdated databases, or limitations of phenotypic methods. These results highlight the complementary roles of WGS and phenotypic DST in drug resistance surveillance and emphasize the need for continuously updated mutation databases, including the WHO catalogue, and standardized interpretation criteria to enhance the clinical utility of WGS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"82 12\",\"pages\":\"547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04530-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04530-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of SAM-TB Platform as a Diagnostic Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Resistance Versus TB-Proflier, PhyResSE, and Mykrobe: A Head-to-Head Comparison.
Accurate detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is essential for tuberculosis control, particularly with increasing multidrug-resistant strains. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as a supplement to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), holds great potential for resistance detection, but comparative analyses of multiple WGS tools remain limited. This study assessed four WGS-based tools-SAM-TB, TB-Profiler, Mykrobe predictor, and PhyResSE-for predicting resistance to four first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and streptomycin) using 113 clinical MTB isolates from Ganzhou, China, with phenotypic DST as reference. All tools showed similar sensitivity (85.04-88.19%) and high specificity (95.69-96.31%). Several known resistance-associated mutations were identified, along with seven novel mutations absent from the WHO catalogue and thirteen of uncertain clinical significance. Discrepancies between WGS and DST occurred across all drugs, potentially due to disputed mutations, outdated databases, or limitations of phenotypic methods. These results highlight the complementary roles of WGS and phenotypic DST in drug resistance surveillance and emphasize the need for continuously updated mutation databases, including the WHO catalogue, and standardized interpretation criteria to enhance the clinical utility of WGS.
期刊介绍:
Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment.
Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas:
physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.