[两个全面保险计划的卫生系统中的卫生不平等?:对德国法定和私人医疗保险投保人微观普查调查的二次分析]。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alfons Hollederer
{"title":"[两个全面保险计划的卫生系统中的卫生不平等?:对德国法定和私人医疗保险投保人微观普查调查的二次分析]。","authors":"Alfons Hollederer","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04142-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The German healthcare system is characterised by the parallelism of private health insurance (PKV) and statutory health insurance (GKV). This constellation of two full insurance systems with simultaneous mandatory health insurance is unique worldwide. This study aims to gain new scientific findings on health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The secondary data analysis of the representative 2021 and 2022 microcensus survey (including the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) uses correlation and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analyses reveal significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics and employment history between PKV and GKV and verify health inequalities between the two groups. Considering socio-demographic factors, logistic regression analyses show that the probability of very good or good self-rated health is twice as high for those with PKV compared to those with GKV (OR = 2.09). The likelihood of health impairments (OR = 0.53) and chronic diseases (OR = 0.64) is reduced by almost half. Despite having similar subjective needs for healthcare, those with PKV consulted medical specialists and dentists more frequently, while those with GKV consulted family doctors or general practitioners more frequently. People with PKV displayed healthier behaviours than those with GKV with regard to tobacco consumption, exercise and diet. However, they consumed more alcohol. People with GKV were more likely than those with PKV to report health expenditure and out-of-pocket payments as a \"major burden\", especially for dental care (10.0% vs. 4.1%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results have implications for the design of healthcare systems and are relevant for prevention and health reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Health inequalities in a health system with two full insurance schemes? : Secondary analyses of the microcensus survey among insured persons of the statutory and private health insurance in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"Alfons Hollederer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00103-025-04142-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The German healthcare system is characterised by the parallelism of private health insurance (PKV) and statutory health insurance (GKV). This constellation of two full insurance systems with simultaneous mandatory health insurance is unique worldwide. This study aims to gain new scientific findings on health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The secondary data analysis of the representative 2021 and 2022 microcensus survey (including the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) uses correlation and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analyses reveal significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics and employment history between PKV and GKV and verify health inequalities between the two groups. Considering socio-demographic factors, logistic regression analyses show that the probability of very good or good self-rated health is twice as high for those with PKV compared to those with GKV (OR = 2.09). The likelihood of health impairments (OR = 0.53) and chronic diseases (OR = 0.64) is reduced by almost half. Despite having similar subjective needs for healthcare, those with PKV consulted medical specialists and dentists more frequently, while those with GKV consulted family doctors or general practitioners more frequently. People with PKV displayed healthier behaviours than those with GKV with regard to tobacco consumption, exercise and diet. However, they consumed more alcohol. People with GKV were more likely than those with PKV to report health expenditure and out-of-pocket payments as a \\\"major burden\\\", especially for dental care (10.0% vs. 4.1%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results have implications for the design of healthcare systems and are relevant for prevention and health reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04142-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04142-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:德国医疗保健系统的特点是私人健康保险(PKV)和法定健康保险(GKV)并行。这两个全面的保险系统同时强制健康保险的星座是世界上独一无二的。这项研究旨在获得关于健康不平等的新的科学发现。方法:对具有代表性的2021年和2022年微观人口调查(包括欧盟收入和生活条件统计)的二次数据进行相关分析和回归分析。结果:比较分析揭示了PKV和GKV在社会人口学特征和就业史上的显著差异,并证实了两组之间的健康不平等。考虑到社会人口因素,逻辑回归分析显示,PKV患者自我评价健康状况非常好或良好的概率是GKV患者的两倍(or = 2.09)。健康损害(OR = 0.53)和慢性疾病(OR = 0.64)的可能性几乎减少了一半。尽管对保健有类似的主观需求,但患有PKV的人更频繁地咨询医学专家和牙医,而患有GKV的人更频繁地咨询家庭医生或全科医生。PKV患者在烟草消费、运动和饮食方面表现出比GKV患者更健康的行为。然而,他们喝了更多的酒。GKV感染者比PKV感染者更有可能将卫生支出和自付费用报告为“主要负担”,特别是牙科保健(10.0%对4.1%)。讨论:研究结果对医疗保健系统的设计具有启示意义,并与预防和健康报告相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Health inequalities in a health system with two full insurance schemes? : Secondary analyses of the microcensus survey among insured persons of the statutory and private health insurance in Germany].

Introduction: The German healthcare system is characterised by the parallelism of private health insurance (PKV) and statutory health insurance (GKV). This constellation of two full insurance systems with simultaneous mandatory health insurance is unique worldwide. This study aims to gain new scientific findings on health inequalities.

Method: The secondary data analysis of the representative 2021 and 2022 microcensus survey (including the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) uses correlation and regression analyses.

Results: Comparative analyses reveal significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics and employment history between PKV and GKV and verify health inequalities between the two groups. Considering socio-demographic factors, logistic regression analyses show that the probability of very good or good self-rated health is twice as high for those with PKV compared to those with GKV (OR = 2.09). The likelihood of health impairments (OR = 0.53) and chronic diseases (OR = 0.64) is reduced by almost half. Despite having similar subjective needs for healthcare, those with PKV consulted medical specialists and dentists more frequently, while those with GKV consulted family doctors or general practitioners more frequently. People with PKV displayed healthier behaviours than those with GKV with regard to tobacco consumption, exercise and diet. However, they consumed more alcohol. People with GKV were more likely than those with PKV to report health expenditure and out-of-pocket payments as a "major burden", especially for dental care (10.0% vs. 4.1%).

Discussion: The results have implications for the design of healthcare systems and are relevant for prevention and health reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信