人口对头颅测量地标识别的影响:两个人工智能驱动的软件程序在巴西和韩国图像中的表现。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Giovanna Sachs Puntigam, Maria Fernanda Silva Andrade-Bortoletto, Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Deborah Queiroz Freitas
{"title":"人口对头颅测量地标识别的影响:两个人工智能驱动的软件程序在巴西和韩国图像中的表现。","authors":"Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Giovanna Sachs Puntigam, Maria Fernanda Silva Andrade-Bortoletto, Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Deborah Queiroz Freitas","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06807-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of cephalometric landmark identification performed by two AI-driven software programs in images from different populations (Brazilian and Korean).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty lateral cephalometric radiographs (30 Brazilian and 30 Korean) were analyzed. The Brazilian images were acquired using the Orthophos XG 5/Ceph device, while the Korean images were obtained from the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2015 database. Images of patients with permanent dentition were included, excluding those with poor head positioning or severe craniofacial deformities. Twenty cephalometric landmarks were identified by two examiners used as the reference standard. Two AI-driven software programs, CefBot™ (Brazil) and WebCeph™ (Korea), automatically identified the same landmarks. Coordinate values for each landmark were measured using ImageJ, and the data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance and Dunnett's post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Brazilian software showed high accuracy in identifying landmarks on Brazilian images (90%) but was less precise on Korean images (80%), with significant discrepancies in the Glabella, Menton L, Basion, and Orbitale landmarks. Similarly, the Korean software had a higher accuracy in its own population (95%) than in another population (85%), with notable inaccuracies in the Menton L, Basion, and Porion landmarks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies in the identification of specific landmarks, such as Glabella and Menton L, suggest that the accuracy of the software may be influenced by the training process itself and by the population origin of the training data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Populational influence on cephalometric landmark identification: performance of two AI-driven software programs in Brazilian and Korean images.\",\"authors\":\"Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Giovanna Sachs Puntigam, Maria Fernanda Silva Andrade-Bortoletto, Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Deborah Queiroz Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06807-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of cephalometric landmark identification performed by two AI-driven software programs in images from different populations (Brazilian and Korean).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty lateral cephalometric radiographs (30 Brazilian and 30 Korean) were analyzed. The Brazilian images were acquired using the Orthophos XG 5/Ceph device, while the Korean images were obtained from the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2015 database. Images of patients with permanent dentition were included, excluding those with poor head positioning or severe craniofacial deformities. Twenty cephalometric landmarks were identified by two examiners used as the reference standard. Two AI-driven software programs, CefBot™ (Brazil) and WebCeph™ (Korea), automatically identified the same landmarks. Coordinate values for each landmark were measured using ImageJ, and the data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance and Dunnett's post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Brazilian software showed high accuracy in identifying landmarks on Brazilian images (90%) but was less precise on Korean images (80%), with significant discrepancies in the Glabella, Menton L, Basion, and Orbitale landmarks. Similarly, the Korean software had a higher accuracy in its own population (95%) than in another population (85%), with notable inaccuracies in the Menton L, Basion, and Porion landmarks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies in the identification of specific landmarks, such as Glabella and Menton L, suggest that the accuracy of the software may be influenced by the training process itself and by the population origin of the training data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06807-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06807-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估两种人工智能驱动的软件程序对来自不同人群(巴西和韩国)的图像进行头颅测量地标识别的性能。方法:对60张侧位头颅x线片(巴西30张,韩国30张)进行分析。巴西图像使用orthophs XG 5/Ceph设备获取,韩国图像来自2015年国际生物医学成像研讨会数据库。包括恒牙列患者的图像,不包括头部定位不良或严重颅面畸形的患者。由两名检查人员确定20个头测标志作为参考标准。两个人工智能驱动的软件程序,CefBot™(巴西)和WebCeph™(韩国),自动识别相同的地标。使用ImageJ测量每个地标的坐标值,并使用方差分析和Dunnett事后检验对数据进行分析。结果:巴西软件在巴西图像上识别地标的准确率很高(90%),但在韩国图像上的准确性较低(80%),在Glabella、Menton L、Basion和Orbitale地标上存在显著差异。同样,韩国软件在本国人口中的准确率(95%)高于其他人口(85%),在Menton L、Basion和Porion地标上有明显的不准确性。结论:特定地标(如Glabella和Menton L)的识别差异表明,软件的准确性可能受到训练过程本身和训练数据的人口来源的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Populational influence on cephalometric landmark identification: performance of two AI-driven software programs in Brazilian and Korean images.

Objective: To assess the performance of cephalometric landmark identification performed by two AI-driven software programs in images from different populations (Brazilian and Korean).

Methods: Sixty lateral cephalometric radiographs (30 Brazilian and 30 Korean) were analyzed. The Brazilian images were acquired using the Orthophos XG 5/Ceph device, while the Korean images were obtained from the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2015 database. Images of patients with permanent dentition were included, excluding those with poor head positioning or severe craniofacial deformities. Twenty cephalometric landmarks were identified by two examiners used as the reference standard. Two AI-driven software programs, CefBot™ (Brazil) and WebCeph™ (Korea), automatically identified the same landmarks. Coordinate values for each landmark were measured using ImageJ, and the data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance and Dunnett's post-hoc test.

Results: The Brazilian software showed high accuracy in identifying landmarks on Brazilian images (90%) but was less precise on Korean images (80%), with significant discrepancies in the Glabella, Menton L, Basion, and Orbitale landmarks. Similarly, the Korean software had a higher accuracy in its own population (95%) than in another population (85%), with notable inaccuracies in the Menton L, Basion, and Porion landmarks.

Conclusion: Discrepancies in the identification of specific landmarks, such as Glabella and Menton L, suggest that the accuracy of the software may be influenced by the training process itself and by the population origin of the training data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信