{"title":"解开远程监测数据以预测良好的NIV质量:E-QualiNIV研究。","authors":"Arnaud Prigent, Clément Blanloeil, Dany Jaffuel, Frederic Gagnadoux, Léo Grassion","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>High treatment quality, defined by mean adherence >4 hours per day, unintentional leaks <24 L/min and a residual Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index <5 events per hour, is associated with better outcomes. Adherence variance may reflect behaviour linked to better treatment quality. This study aimed to assess whether monthly adherence variance is associated with improved treatment quality in patients treated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for more than 4 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>E-QualiNIV is a retrospective study evaluating treatment quality in 511 telemonitored patients with chronic respiratory failure, observed from 15 April to 31 October 2023. The study followed three steps: (1) hierarchical clustering based on individual adherence variance; (2) assessing whether monthly adherence variance in the preceding month predicted the proportion of alerts in the subsequent month and (3) evaluating treatment quality based on the number of months with low adherence variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster 1, consisting of patients with adherence variance below 3, had a significantly higher proportion (57.93%) of patients achieving high-quality treatment compared with other clusters (43.1% for cluster 2 and 46.4% for cluster 3) (p=0.035). Patients with a low adherence variance in the preceding month were more likely to achieve high-quality treatment in the following month (except for May, significant differences every month from p=0.04 to p<0.01). Those with 6 or more months of low adherence variance had a significantly higher probability of receiving high-quality treatment over the entire period (coefficient: 0.2649, p value: 0.0028) compared with those who did not (non-significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The E-QualiNIV study demonstrates that low adherence variance is associated with high-quality treatment and serves as a prognostic indicator of treatment stability and alert occurrence in the subsequent month.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling telemonitoring data to predict good NIV quality: the E-QualiNIV study.\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Prigent, Clément Blanloeil, Dany Jaffuel, Frederic Gagnadoux, Léo Grassion\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>High treatment quality, defined by mean adherence >4 hours per day, unintentional leaks <24 L/min and a residual Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index <5 events per hour, is associated with better outcomes. Adherence variance may reflect behaviour linked to better treatment quality. This study aimed to assess whether monthly adherence variance is associated with improved treatment quality in patients treated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for more than 4 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>E-QualiNIV is a retrospective study evaluating treatment quality in 511 telemonitored patients with chronic respiratory failure, observed from 15 April to 31 October 2023. The study followed three steps: (1) hierarchical clustering based on individual adherence variance; (2) assessing whether monthly adherence variance in the preceding month predicted the proportion of alerts in the subsequent month and (3) evaluating treatment quality based on the number of months with low adherence variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster 1, consisting of patients with adherence variance below 3, had a significantly higher proportion (57.93%) of patients achieving high-quality treatment compared with other clusters (43.1% for cluster 2 and 46.4% for cluster 3) (p=0.035). Patients with a low adherence variance in the preceding month were more likely to achieve high-quality treatment in the following month (except for May, significant differences every month from p=0.04 to p<0.01). Those with 6 or more months of low adherence variance had a significantly higher probability of receiving high-quality treatment over the entire period (coefficient: 0.2649, p value: 0.0028) compared with those who did not (non-significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The E-QualiNIV study demonstrates that low adherence variance is associated with high-quality treatment and serves as a prognostic indicator of treatment stability and alert occurrence in the subsequent month.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unravelling telemonitoring data to predict good NIV quality: the E-QualiNIV study.
Background and objective: High treatment quality, defined by mean adherence >4 hours per day, unintentional leaks <24 L/min and a residual Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index <5 events per hour, is associated with better outcomes. Adherence variance may reflect behaviour linked to better treatment quality. This study aimed to assess whether monthly adherence variance is associated with improved treatment quality in patients treated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for more than 4 months.
Methods: E-QualiNIV is a retrospective study evaluating treatment quality in 511 telemonitored patients with chronic respiratory failure, observed from 15 April to 31 October 2023. The study followed three steps: (1) hierarchical clustering based on individual adherence variance; (2) assessing whether monthly adherence variance in the preceding month predicted the proportion of alerts in the subsequent month and (3) evaluating treatment quality based on the number of months with low adherence variance.
Results: Cluster 1, consisting of patients with adherence variance below 3, had a significantly higher proportion (57.93%) of patients achieving high-quality treatment compared with other clusters (43.1% for cluster 2 and 46.4% for cluster 3) (p=0.035). Patients with a low adherence variance in the preceding month were more likely to achieve high-quality treatment in the following month (except for May, significant differences every month from p=0.04 to p<0.01). Those with 6 or more months of low adherence variance had a significantly higher probability of receiving high-quality treatment over the entire period (coefficient: 0.2649, p value: 0.0028) compared with those who did not (non-significant).
Conclusion: The E-QualiNIV study demonstrates that low adherence variance is associated with high-quality treatment and serves as a prognostic indicator of treatment stability and alert occurrence in the subsequent month.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.