中国和美国转移性乳腺癌新发手术现状分析:一项多中心真实世界研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Dongxu Ma, Heng Cao, Jiang Wu, Tongxuan Shang, Zizhao Guo, Lin Cong, Ziqi Jia, Yuchen Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Xiang Wang
{"title":"中国和美国转移性乳腺癌新发手术现状分析:一项多中心真实世界研究","authors":"Dongxu Ma, Heng Cao, Jiang Wu, Tongxuan Shang, Zizhao Guo, Lin Cong, Ziqi Jia, Yuchen Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Xiang Wang","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18490-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>De novo metastatic breast cancer-defined by distant metastases at diagnosis-poses treatment challenges. While systemic therapy is standard, the benefit of primary tumor surgery remains debated. This study compared surgical patterns and survival in China versus the USA to provide evidence for personalized strategies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with surgically treated de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Center Oncology Information Database (NCCOID; n = 2037, 2013-2020) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (n = 3175, 2013-2020). Clinical features, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were contrasted. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models identified OS predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with SEER, NCCOID patients were younger and had more T2 tumors; mastectomy predominated in both, though breast-conserving surgery was more frequent in SEER, and preoperative systemic therapy was more common in NCCOID. NCCOID achieved superior OS (1 year, 3 year, 5 year: 91.5%, 77.4%, 67.9%, respectively) versus SEER (87.7%, 62.8%, 46.4%). Improved survival was seen in hormone-receptor-positive tumors, smaller primary lesions (lower T category), and bone-only metastases. Multivariate analysis confirmed age 35-54 years, HR+ and HER2+ status, and limited (especially bone-only) metastases as independent favorable factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical management of de novo metastatic breast cancer differs between China and the USA. Select patients-particularly those with HR+ or HER2+ tumors, small primaries, and limited metastases-may benefit from resection, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary, personalized decision-making and prospective validation of optimal surgical timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Current Status of De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Surgery in China and the USA: A Multicenter Real-World Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dongxu Ma, Heng Cao, Jiang Wu, Tongxuan Shang, Zizhao Guo, Lin Cong, Ziqi Jia, Yuchen Liu, Jiaqi Liu, Xiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18490-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>De novo metastatic breast cancer-defined by distant metastases at diagnosis-poses treatment challenges. While systemic therapy is standard, the benefit of primary tumor surgery remains debated. This study compared surgical patterns and survival in China versus the USA to provide evidence for personalized strategies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with surgically treated de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Center Oncology Information Database (NCCOID; n = 2037, 2013-2020) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (n = 3175, 2013-2020). Clinical features, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were contrasted. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models identified OS predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with SEER, NCCOID patients were younger and had more T2 tumors; mastectomy predominated in both, though breast-conserving surgery was more frequent in SEER, and preoperative systemic therapy was more common in NCCOID. NCCOID achieved superior OS (1 year, 3 year, 5 year: 91.5%, 77.4%, 67.9%, respectively) versus SEER (87.7%, 62.8%, 46.4%). Improved survival was seen in hormone-receptor-positive tumors, smaller primary lesions (lower T category), and bone-only metastases. Multivariate analysis confirmed age 35-54 years, HR+ and HER2+ status, and limited (especially bone-only) metastases as independent favorable factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical management of de novo metastatic breast cancer differs between China and the USA. Select patients-particularly those with HR+ or HER2+ tumors, small primaries, and limited metastases-may benefit from resection, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary, personalized decision-making and prospective validation of optimal surgical timing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18490-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18490-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新发转移性乳腺癌在诊断时被定义为远处转移,这给治疗带来了挑战。虽然全身治疗是标准的,但原发性肿瘤手术的益处仍存在争议。本研究比较了中国和美国的手术模式和生存率,为个性化策略提供证据。患者和方法:在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,从国家癌症中心肿瘤信息数据库(NCCOID; n = 2037, 2013-2020)和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER) (n = 3175, 2013-2020)中确定手术治疗的新生转移性乳腺癌患者。对比临床特征、治疗方法和总生存期(OS)。Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox模型确定了OS预测因子。结果:与SEER相比,NCCOID患者年龄更轻,T2肿瘤发生率更高;两者均以乳房切除术为主,但保乳手术在SEER中更为常见,而术前全身治疗在NCCOID中更为常见。NCCOID的OS(1年、3年、5年:分别为91.5%、77.4%、67.9%)优于SEER(87.7%、62.8%、46.4%)。在激素受体阳性的肿瘤、较小的原发病灶(低T类别)和仅骨转移的肿瘤中,生存率均有提高。多因素分析证实年龄35-54岁,HR+和HER2+状态,以及有限的(尤其是骨)转移是独立的有利因素。结论:中国和美国对新发转移性乳腺癌的手术治疗存在差异。选择性患者,特别是那些HR+或HER2+肿瘤,小原发和有限转移的患者,可能从切除中受益,强调需要多学科,个性化决策和最佳手术时机的前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Current Status of De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Surgery in China and the USA: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

Background: De novo metastatic breast cancer-defined by distant metastases at diagnosis-poses treatment challenges. While systemic therapy is standard, the benefit of primary tumor surgery remains debated. This study compared surgical patterns and survival in China versus the USA to provide evidence for personalized strategies.

Patients and methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with surgically treated de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Center Oncology Information Database (NCCOID; n = 2037, 2013-2020) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (n = 3175, 2013-2020). Clinical features, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were contrasted. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models identified OS predictors.

Results: Compared with SEER, NCCOID patients were younger and had more T2 tumors; mastectomy predominated in both, though breast-conserving surgery was more frequent in SEER, and preoperative systemic therapy was more common in NCCOID. NCCOID achieved superior OS (1 year, 3 year, 5 year: 91.5%, 77.4%, 67.9%, respectively) versus SEER (87.7%, 62.8%, 46.4%). Improved survival was seen in hormone-receptor-positive tumors, smaller primary lesions (lower T category), and bone-only metastases. Multivariate analysis confirmed age 35-54 years, HR+ and HER2+ status, and limited (especially bone-only) metastases as independent favorable factors.

Conclusions: Surgical management of de novo metastatic breast cancer differs between China and the USA. Select patients-particularly those with HR+ or HER2+ tumors, small primaries, and limited metastases-may benefit from resection, underscoring the need for multidisciplinary, personalized decision-making and prospective validation of optimal surgical timing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信